Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 711.

P00P135

full member

Activity: 1126

Merit: 136

Quote from: papampi on July 29, 2017, 01:56:52 PM

Quote from: P00P135 on July 29, 2017, 01:49:33 PM

Quote from: papampi on July 29, 2017, 01:47:33 PM

Does tt, ttli, ttdcr work on Nvidia cards
I can't get them to work
These are in my config
-tt 65,65,65,65,65,65
-ttli 70,70,70,70,70,70
-ttdcr 68,68,68,68,68,68

Code:

ETH - Total Speed: 177.979 Mh/s, Total Shares: 24(5+1+4+3+5+6), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09 
ETH: GPU1 29.719 Mh/s, GPU2 29.606 Mh/s, GPU3 29.721 Mh/s, GPU4 29.627 Mh/s, GPU5 29.646 Mh/s, GPU6 29.661 Mh/s 
  LBC - Total Speed: 170.560 Mh/s, Total Shares: 42(11+4+8+5+8+6), Rejected: 0 
  LBC: GPU1 28.480 Mh/s, GPU2 28.372 Mh/s, GPU3 28.482 Mh/s, GPU4 28.392 Mh/s, GPU5 28.410 Mh/s, GPU6 28.424 Mh/s 
Incorrect ETH shares: none 
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 177.310 Mh/s 
Pool switches: ETH - 0, LBC - 0 
Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch 136(2.06GB) Current LBC share target: 0x00000001213e7591 (diff: 3801MH) 
DCR coefs (-ttdcr): GPU1 100%, GPU2 100%, GPU3 100%, GPU4 100%, GPU5 100%, GPU6 100% 
GPU1 t=77C fan=84%, GPU2 t=73C fan=74%, GPU3 t=73C fan=76%, GPU4 t=71C fan=72%, GPU5 t=69C fan=69%, GPU6 t=69C fan=69%

read the readme

lol ...
Read it 1000 times, it said fan control doesn't work, but nothing about intensity not working too

Note: for NVIDIA cards only temperature monitoring is supported, temperature management is not supported.

You dont really need to use ttli or ttdcr if you set your GPU target temp to 80-90 in afterburner as it will throttle for you.

fr4nkthetank

legendary

Activity: 2294

Merit: 1182

Now the money is free, and so the people will be

@claymore that is quite impressive indeed.

Korsakopf

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 105

Quote from: Claymore on July 29, 2017, 07:40:51 AM

Quote from: neega on July 29, 2017, 06:11:07 AM

Quote from: Claymore on July 24, 2017, 05:52:47 AM

As I said before, AMD is going to fix the DAG issue for both Vega and Polaris, and new drivers will be available soon.

Hi, Claymore!
Please, don't think that i'm trying to say you are lieer. But all this more looks like a rumor. No any other signs of AMD activity, only your posts. Can you, please, tell us on what is your confidence based? Maybe you can show some screenshots of your communications with AMD and where we could see words of AMD workers telling that they are going to fix this issue?
Thanks!

I tell you what I know from AMD engineers, I'm not going to prove anything, it's up to you believe me or not.

Thanks for your comments on this subject. I'm looking forward to the updates and until then we will just wait patiently. I'm thankful for the work you put into this!

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Quote from: P00P135 on July 29, 2017, 01:49:33 PM

Quote from: papampi on July 29, 2017, 01:47:33 PM

Does tt, ttli, ttdcr work on Nvidia cards
I can't get them to work
These are in my config
-tt 65,65,65,65,65,65
-ttli 70,70,70,70,70,70
-ttdcr 68,68,68,68,68,68

Code:

ETH - Total Speed: 177.979 Mh/s, Total Shares: 24(5+1+4+3+5+6), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09 
ETH: GPU1 29.719 Mh/s, GPU2 29.606 Mh/s, GPU3 29.721 Mh/s, GPU4 29.627 Mh/s, GPU5 29.646 Mh/s, GPU6 29.661 Mh/s 
  LBC - Total Speed: 170.560 Mh/s, Total Shares: 42(11+4+8+5+8+6), Rejected: 0 
  LBC: GPU1 28.480 Mh/s, GPU2 28.372 Mh/s, GPU3 28.482 Mh/s, GPU4 28.392 Mh/s, GPU5 28.410 Mh/s, GPU6 28.424 Mh/s 
Incorrect ETH shares: none 
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 177.310 Mh/s 
Pool switches: ETH - 0, LBC - 0 
Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch 136(2.06GB) Current LBC share target: 0x00000001213e7591 (diff: 3801MH) 
DCR coefs (-ttdcr): GPU1 100%, GPU2 100%, GPU3 100%, GPU4 100%, GPU5 100%, GPU6 100% 
GPU1 t=77C fan=84%, GPU2 t=73C fan=74%, GPU3 t=73C fan=76%, GPU4 t=71C fan=72%, GPU5 t=69C fan=69%, GPU6 t=69C fan=69%

read the readme

lol ...
Read it 1000 times, it said fan control doesn't work, but nothing about intensity not working too

P00P135

full member

Activity: 1126

Merit: 136

Quote from: papampi on July 29, 2017, 01:47:33 PM

Does tt, ttli, ttdcr work on Nvidia cards
I can't get them to work
These are in my config
-tt 65,65,65,65,65,65
-ttli 70,70,70,70,70,70
-ttdcr 68,68,68,68,68,68

Code:

ETH - Total Speed: 177.979 Mh/s, Total Shares: 24(5+1+4+3+5+6), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09 
ETH: GPU1 29.719 Mh/s, GPU2 29.606 Mh/s, GPU3 29.721 Mh/s, GPU4 29.627 Mh/s, GPU5 29.646 Mh/s, GPU6 29.661 Mh/s 
  LBC - Total Speed: 170.560 Mh/s, Total Shares: 42(11+4+8+5+8+6), Rejected: 0 
  LBC: GPU1 28.480 Mh/s, GPU2 28.372 Mh/s, GPU3 28.482 Mh/s, GPU4 28.392 Mh/s, GPU5 28.410 Mh/s, GPU6 28.424 Mh/s 
Incorrect ETH shares: none 
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 177.310 Mh/s 
Pool switches: ETH - 0, LBC - 0 
Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch 136(2.06GB) Current LBC share target: 0x00000001213e7591 (diff: 3801MH) 
DCR coefs (-ttdcr): GPU1 100%, GPU2 100%, GPU3 100%, GPU4 100%, GPU5 100%, GPU6 100% 
GPU1 t=77C fan=84%, GPU2 t=73C fan=74%, GPU3 t=73C fan=76%, GPU4 t=71C fan=72%, GPU5 t=69C fan=69%, GPU6 t=69C fan=69%

read the readme

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Does tt, ttli, ttdcr work on Nvidia cards
I can't get them to work
These are in my config
-tt 65,65,65,65,65,65
-ttli 70,70,70,70,70,70
-ttdcr 68,68,68,68,68,68

Code:

ETH - Total Speed: 177.979 Mh/s, Total Shares: 24(5+1+4+3+5+6), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09 
ETH: GPU1 29.719 Mh/s, GPU2 29.606 Mh/s, GPU3 29.721 Mh/s, GPU4 29.627 Mh/s, GPU5 29.646 Mh/s, GPU6 29.661 Mh/s 
  LBC - Total Speed: 170.560 Mh/s, Total Shares: 42(11+4+8+5+8+6), Rejected: 0 
  LBC: GPU1 28.480 Mh/s, GPU2 28.372 Mh/s, GPU3 28.482 Mh/s, GPU4 28.392 Mh/s, GPU5 28.410 Mh/s, GPU6 28.424 Mh/s 
Incorrect ETH shares: none 
 1 minute average ETH total speed: 177.310 Mh/s 
Pool switches: ETH - 0, LBC - 0 
Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch 136(2.06GB) Current LBC share target: 0x00000001213e7591 (diff: 3801MH) 
DCR coefs (-ttdcr): GPU1 100%, GPU2 100%, GPU3 100%, GPU4 100%, GPU5 100%, GPU6 100% 
GPU1 t=77C fan=84%, GPU2 t=73C fan=74%, GPU3 t=73C fan=76%, GPU4 t=71C fan=72%, GPU5 t=69C fan=69%, GPU6 t=69C fan=69%

goldstrk

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Quote from: jinda28 on July 29, 2017, 01:13:22 PM

Quote from: jinda28 on July 27, 2017, 12:56:11 AM

Hey guys. I'm new to this and was hoping to get some help.
I am using ethOS mining ETH with claymore and nanopool.

I'm trying to change the payout to nanopool but its asking for the email password.
I'm not sure how to put the email on either the local.conf or claymore stub file so I can finally change the payout.
Please can someone show me what to do? Thanks in advance.

Anyone pls? Thanks.

./ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal address/rig_name/yourmail-epsw rigpass

jinda28

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: jinda28 on July 27, 2017, 12:56:11 AM

Hey guys. I'm new to this and was hoping to get some help.
I am using ethOS mining ETH with claymore and nanopool.

I'm trying to change the payout to nanopool but its asking for the email password.
I'm not sure how to put the email on either the local.conf or claymore stub file so I can finally change the payout.
Please can someone show me what to do? Thanks in advance.

Anyone pls? Thanks.

cashen

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 251

Quote from: P00P135 on July 29, 2017, 12:26:12 PM

Quote from: cscheat on July 29, 2017, 12:22:55 PM

Quote from: eddiechi on July 29, 2017, 11:48:43 AM

I never said anything was free --- regardless of free or not... that has nothing to do with calling someone out or stating his information is just a rumor unless he proves it is just plain ignorance...

now I could see if a newbie or someone like you who just signed up here the last month came on here and posted a statement like about having personal information from AMD updates, people would inquire and ask for proof... and rightly so....

but you're getting the info basically from the "horses mouth" or at least as close as we are privy to getting it from the "horses mouth" and is in no way inclined to even share it with anyone --- and why would one share it if they end up being accused of making rumors .... seems counterproductive and just ignorant..... a little etiquette goes a long way sometimes!

Yes. Agreed ! Thanks for the hardwork Mr Claymore ! Hope to claim back my lost hashrates !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If everyone claims back their lost hashrates that just means higher difficulty XD

The entire network wasn't effected though.....

P00P135

full member

Activity: 1126

Merit: 136

Quote from: cscheat on July 29, 2017, 12:22:55 PM

Quote from: eddiechi on July 29, 2017, 11:48:43 AM

I never said anything was free --- regardless of free or not... that has nothing to do with calling someone out or stating his information is just a rumor unless he proves it is just plain ignorance...

now I could see if a newbie or someone like you who just signed up here the last month came on here and posted a statement like about having personal information from AMD updates, people would inquire and ask for proof... and rightly so....

but you're getting the info basically from the "horses mouth" or at least as close as we are privy to getting it from the "horses mouth" and is in no way inclined to even share it with anyone --- and why would one share it if they end up being accused of making rumors .... seems counterproductive and just ignorant..... a little etiquette goes a long way sometimes!

Yes. Agreed ! Thanks for the hardwork Mr Claymore ! Hope to claim back my lost hashrates !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If everyone claims back their lost hashrates that just means higher difficulty XD

cscheat

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

Quote from: eddiechi on July 29, 2017, 11:48:43 AM

I never said anything was free --- regardless of free or not... that has nothing to do with calling someone out or stating his information is just a rumor unless he proves it is just plain ignorance...

now I could see if a newbie or someone like you who just signed up here the last month came on here and posted a statement like about having personal information from AMD updates, people would inquire and ask for proof... and rightly so....

but you're getting the info basically from the "horses mouth" or at least as close as we are privy to getting it from the "horses mouth" and is in no way inclined to even share it with anyone --- and why would one share it if they end up being accused of making rumors .... seems counterproductive and just ignorant..... a little etiquette goes a long way sometimes!

Yes. Agreed ! Thanks for the hardwork Mr Claymore ! Hope to claim back my lost hashrates !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

cas33

jr. member

Activity: 234

Merit: 2

Quote from: Claymore on July 29, 2017, 07:40:51 AM

Quote from: neega on July 29, 2017, 06:11:07 AM

Quote from: Claymore on July 24, 2017, 05:52:47 AM

As I said before, AMD is going to fix the DAG issue for both Vega and Polaris, and new drivers will be available soon.

Hi, Claymore!
Please, don't think that i'm trying to say you are lieer. But all this more looks like a rumor. No any other signs of AMD activity, only your posts. Can you, please, tell us on what is your confidence based? Maybe you can show some screenshots of your communications with AMD and where we could see words of AMD workers telling that they are going to fix this issue?
Thanks!

I tell you what I know from AMD engineers, I'm not going to prove anything, it's up to you believe me or not.

Thanks Claymore for your great work! Very appreciated! Wink

eddiechi

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

I never said anything was free --- regardless of free or not... that has nothing to do with calling someone out or stating his information is just a rumor unless he proves it is just plain ignorance...

now I could see if a newbie or someone like you who just signed up here the last month came on here and posted a statement like about having personal information from AMD updates, people would inquire and ask for proof... and rightly so....

but you're getting the info basically from the "horses mouth" or at least as close as we are privy to getting it from the "horses mouth" and is in no way inclined to even share it with anyone --- and why would one share it if they end up being accused of making rumors .... seems counterproductive and just ignorant..... a little etiquette goes a long way sometimes!

rdluffy

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 1472

Quote from: eddiechi on July 29, 2017, 11:14:01 AM

Quote from: neega on July 29, 2017, 06:11:07 AM

Quote from: Claymore on July 24, 2017, 05:52:47 AM

As I said before, AMD is going to fix the DAG issue for both Vega and Polaris, and new drivers will be available soon.

Hi, Claymore!

Please, don't think that i'm trying to say you are lieer. But all this more looks like a rumor. No any other signs of AMD activity, only your posts. Can you, please, tell us on what is your confidence based? Maybe you can show some screenshots of your communications with AMD and where we could see words of AMD workers telling that they are going to fix this issue?

Thanks!

Questioning the person that providing the tools for you to participate in mining here - on the viability of his information or knowledge??? Huh

and then requesting him to prove it??? Shocked

(alternative method)....

Claymore, Thanks for all the tiresome work, sure hope the information that you generously shared with us on AMD driver updates comes to fruition soon!

Dude, it's not for free, there is the dev fee, and a "customer" is not wrong to ask for infos

eddiechi

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: neega on July 29, 2017, 06:11:07 AM

Quote from: Claymore on July 24, 2017, 05:52:47 AM

As I said before, AMD is going to fix the DAG issue for both Vega and Polaris, and new drivers will be available soon.

Hi, Claymore!

Please, don't think that i'm trying to say you are lieer. But all this more looks like a rumor. No any other signs of AMD activity, only your posts. Can you, please, tell us on what is your confidence based? Maybe you can show some screenshots of your communications with AMD and where we could see words of AMD workers telling that they are going to fix this issue?

Thanks!

Questioning the person that providing the tools for you to participate in mining here - on the viability of his information or knowledge??? Huh

and then requesting him to prove it??? Shocked

(alternative method)....

Claymore, Thanks for all the tiresome work, sure hope the information that you generously shared with us on AMD driver updates comes to fruition soon!

goldstrk

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Hello Claymore,

First thanks for the great work!

I'm coming to you in order to ask for some help since one of my miners is crashing and I'm not understanding the reason why since it's quite random. Everything runs smoothly with the following command

Quote

export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
./ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0xc9525040bc3f5E0B********/rig04 -epsw x-mode 1 -tstop 85 -tt -50 -fanmin 60 -fanmax 90 -r 1

... but then, out of nothing, one GPU starts to hash 0 and disconnects. The miner then attempts to reboot showing some kind of memory leak (or at least I'm supposing it's...).

Quote

AMD Cards available: 5
GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4068 MB available, 14 compute units
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4068 MB available, 14 compute units
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 4068 MB available, 14 compute units
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 1932 MB available, 14 compute units
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 4068 MB available, 14 compute units
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 480/580

Any reason why GPU #3 has suddently stopped hashing? Noticed that's not releasing the memory.

Ubuntu 16.04 | Drivers 17.10

PS: If anyone knows what's happening please let me know.

Cheers.

kellog90

newbie

Activity: 133

Merit: 0

17:53:23:607   83c   ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ»
17:53:23:623   83c   ş Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.7 ş
17:53:23:623   83c   ČÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍĽ
17:53:23:623   83c
17:53:23:853   83c   ETH: 1 pool is specified
17:53:23:853   83c   Main Ethereum pool is soil.miners-zone.net:28008
17:53:24:429   83c   OpenCL platform: Experimental OpenCL 2.1 CPU Only Platform
17:53:24:429   83c   OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
17:53:24:445   83c   OpenCL initializing...

17:53:24:445   83c   AMD Cards available: 3
17:53:24:445   83c   GPU #0: Baffin, 3072 MB available, 16 compute units
17:53:24:461   83c   GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 460/560
17:53:24:461   83c   GPU #1: Baffin, 3072 MB available, 16 compute units
17:53:24:461   83c   GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 460/560
17:53:24:476   83c   GPU #2: Baffin, 3072 MB available, 16 compute units
17:53:24:492   83c   GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 460/560
17:53:24:492   83c   POOL/SOLO version
17:53:24:492   83c   b370

And exit claymoredual 9.7 . Problem?

Win10 3x replanted
Driver OK
My card is 4gb RX 560.

Once everything goes good!
I restart windows or claymore and this error.
Someone help pls!

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: fr4nkthetank on July 29, 2017, 08:43:25 AM

Quote from: Claymore on July 29, 2017, 04:54:23 AM

New version with Vega support is close, currently I see 35-36 MH/s ETH at stock clocks and huge speed for second coins. But it's too hot even at 1.0v for core and 0.9v for memory.

Hey Claymore, have you lowered core clock massively ? Should be as or more efficient than an 580, it is possible.

Not yet, also I did not change anything in bios, but I'm sure it's possible to make it much more efficient with bios/voltage/clocks changes.

BTW, at "-dcri 500" I get 4600MH/s DCR (at stock clocks) after some Vega-related improvements in assembler code (i.e. these improvements are not available for Polaris cards), now I'm working on SIA and PASC...
At "-dcri 100" I see 35MH/s ETH and 3500MH/s DCR.
If I set 1050MHz for memory (default is 945MHz), I get 40MH/s ETH.

neega

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: Claymore on July 29, 2017, 07:40:51 AM

Quote from: neega on July 29, 2017, 06:11:07 AM

Quote from: Claymore on July 24, 2017, 05:52:47 AM

As I said before, AMD is going to fix the DAG issue for both Vega and Polaris, and new drivers will be available soon.

Hi, Claymore!
Please, don't think that i'm trying to say you are lieer. But all this more looks like a rumor. No any other signs of AMD activity, only your posts. Can you, please, tell us on what is your confidence based? Maybe you can show some screenshots of your communications with AMD and where we could see words of AMD workers telling that they are going to fix this issue?
Thanks!

I tell you what I know from AMD engineers, I'm not going to prove anything, it's up to you believe me or not.

Thank you anyway!

I believe in good)

Sorry if I touched your feelings. Didn't mean to do that.

Good luck to us all!

ziploc+

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

have question..

I have a 2* r9 290x GPU rig on a old Windows AM2 4GB of RAM rig mining eth

I have a weird behavior which starter few days ago....

1st GPU mines at full speed but the second takes longer to load DAG and mines only at 3 MH/s

and if I mine with only 1 GPU it goes full speed for some time and then it goes down to 8MH/s....

anyone seen a similar behavior and what can cause that ?

Thx in advance

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 711. (Read 6590757 times)