Topic: Claymore's NeoScrypt AMD GPU Miner v1.2 (Windows) - page 11. (Read 32800 times)
the better make NeoScrypt dual miner
Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
That sounds quite good. Would you mind sharing your overdriventool settings?vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
I am limited by my PSU (EVGA 1600 G2) to run these speeds but maybe I could get somewhat closer with some tweaking. These are my settings (although they won't mean much if I gimp them with -25 PL...
I use old 23Aug blockchain driver.
I never use PL for downvolting, only p-states.
In your example I don't like 950 and 1000 mV settings for memory, they shoud be the same with corresponding P7-state (900 or 905 mV)
Oh, if you calculate the increased difficulty that will come, the only choice is ETH of course 
It seems I just waste my time with new miners...
Don't think so... It seems I just waste my time with new miners...1. Nicehash will add this miner for sure - and on some spikes of high demand for Neoscrypt Nicehash Legacy miner will switch even "reds" to this algo (using your new miner which gives comparable hashrate )...
2. Autoswitch beatween algos on Miningpoolhub with also can use it
3. ETH -> POS , miners goes to ETC / Pirl / ... and diff rise - so some of them will go to Neoscrypt in search of better profit
Anyway - new decent miner on "non-red's" algo - is a good job.
Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
That sounds quite good. Would you mind sharing your overdriventool settings?vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
I am limited by my PSU (EVGA 1600 G2) to run these speeds but maybe I could get somewhat closer with some tweaking. These are my settings (although they won't mean much if I gimp them with -25 PL...
I use old 23Aug blockchain driver.
I never use PL for downvolting, only p-states.
In your example I don't like 950 and 1000 mV settings for memory, they shoud be the same with corresponding P7-state (900 or 905 mV)
Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
That sounds quite good. Would you mind sharing your overdriventool settings?vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
I am limited by my PSU (EVGA 1600 G2) to run these speeds but maybe I could get somewhat closer with some tweaking. These are my settings (although they won't mean much if I gimp them with -25 PL...
Name=Vega64b
GPU_P0=852;900
GPU_P1=991;900
GPU_P2=1084;900
GPU_P3=1138;900
GPU_P4=1150;900
GPU_P5=1202;900
GPU_P6=1212;900
GPU_P7=1408;905
Mem_P0=167;900
Mem_P1=500;900
Mem_P2=800;950
Mem_P3=1115;1000
Fan_Min=3600
Fan_Max=4900
Fan_Target=75
Fan_Acoustic=2400
Power_Temp=85
Power_Target=0
Please Also think about us........ NVIDIA miners.......
Earlier yours Zcash was also AMD only....
Earlier yours Zcash was also AMD only....
Both my ZCash and Neoscrypt miners will be AMD-only, sorry.
There are many NVIDIA devs here and they already released appropriate miners.
come one mate because there are other miner out there not means equality is same, plus more choise always is better & it can create a good dev competition my be in a pozitive way ... personal after i was use your Eth one damn i can say i wish you to change your mind & make Zcash & this new Neoscrypt supporting Nvidia to
but probabil maintain AMD & Nvidia on same equality is not easy task ...
anyway hope to change your mind & make a lot ppls happy
Cheers & thx
Anyway, now AMD is not worse than NVIDIA in NeoScrypt mining, let me know if you can get 2200KH/s from single 1080Ti
we are not far away, my 1080 ti gives 2000+ with latest excavator and just below 2000 with modified hsr...
nevertheless, it's good to have a decent amd neoscrypt miner, thanks
(I have different brands & models of cards, more fun....)
Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
Good work, Claymore! ))
Ok testing with vega 56. It really seems to be a power limit problem. With no real tweaking, just power limit on a stock 56 GPU, I get.
190w -19pl, 1300
235w 0pl, 1450
So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage. This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.
190w -19pl, 1300
235w 0pl, 1450
So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage. This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.
Agreed, my watercooled Vega64 at stock clocks takes 500W to show 2200KH/s, it's crazy. Though it takes similar power in dual mining too.
vega has to be softmodded with power play table mod to reduce power or itsa hog
all my vega 56 and frontier cards are softmodded and do 40mhs eth 2500 blake at around 200ish watts
Not tried neoscrypt yet tho with this new miner
nice!!!
More algos for the best miner around!!
Congrats Claymore for the good job!!
More algos for the best miner around!!
Congrats Claymore for the good job!!
It'd be interesting when we get more data from users here, especially when it comes to optimal clocks to use.
Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.
EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?
Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.
EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?
No, I use stock clocks in my tests.
wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?
I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.
I'm running drivers 18.2.2 with my 570/580 cards. the -powlim 50 option doesn't seem to work
"Failed to set new Power Control treshold for GPU #0" .. that's exactly the message i get... spelling error and all.
I use 18.2.2 and -powlim works fine with my RX580. Anyway, you can try to use AB to set power limit.
Thanks for your help. Figured it out afterwards. the problem wasn't your code, nor AB. my one 580 is an OC version and it's power limit is coded to be 30 max. setting -powlim to 30 or less worked fine.
wow. this is great. i hope for more algos from you in preparation to these asics and pos thingies.
It'd be interesting when we get more data from users here, especially when it comes to optimal clocks to use.
Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.
EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?
Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.
EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?
No, I use stock clocks in my tests.
wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?
I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.
I'm running drivers 18.2.2 with my 570/580 cards. the -powlim 50 option doesn't seem to work
"Failed to set new Power Control treshold for GPU #0" .. that's exactly the message i get... spelling error and all.
I use 18.2.2 and -powlim works fine with my RX580. Anyway, you can try to use AB to set power limit.
wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?
I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.
I'm running drivers 18.2.2 with my 570/580 cards. the -powlim 50 option doesn't seem to work
"Failed to set new Power Control treshold for GPU #0" .. that's exactly the message i get... spelling error and all.
It'd be interesting when we get more data from users here, especially when it comes to optimal clocks to use.
Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.
EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?
Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.
EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?
Did anyone test how much undervolt is possible going from stock card settings for stable mining for any of these cards for neoscrypt?
Anyway, now AMD is not worse than NVIDIA in NeoScrypt mining, let me know if you can get 2200KH/s from single 1080Ti
2x sapphire nitro rx vega 56
160watts at wall 1500k/hs -19 pl stock clocks
im told the fan on the standard vega pulls 30watts on its own
the nitro has 3 fans and its hardly hitting 50c
sapphire rx560 391 k/hs not sure of wattage atm
160watts at wall 1500k/hs -19 pl stock clocks
im told the fan on the standard vega pulls 30watts on its own
the nitro has 3 fans and its hardly hitting 50c
sapphire rx560 391 k/hs not sure of wattage atm
Ok testing with vega 56. It really seems to be a power limit problem. With no real tweaking, just power limit on a stock 56 GPU, I get.
190w -19pl, 1300
235w 0pl, 1450
So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage. This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.
190w -19pl, 1300
235w 0pl, 1450
So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage. This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.
Agreed, my watercooled Vega64 at stock clocks takes 500W to show 2200KH/s, it's crazy. Though it takes similar power in dual mining too.
Ok testing with vega 56. It really seems to be a power limit problem. With no real tweaking, just power limit on a stock 56 GPU, I get.
190w -19pl, 1300
235w 0pl, 1450
So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage. This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.
190w -19pl, 1300
235w 0pl, 1450
So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage. This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.
Jump to: