2Gb version not necessary,
I have HD7850 1Gb it work fine 95sol on v8
Would you like to share the price of HD 7850? I have HD7850 1Gb it work fine 95sol on v8
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 489. (Read 3839163 times)
Is anyone else having problems controlling their rigs via ethmon with v8.0?
For my farm, v8.0 seems to have broken the communications between my miners and ethmon. Everything is in read-only mode, even when I specify the correct -mport settings. I have checked all firewall settings, including application-specific settings, and everything is normal. I've even disabled the firewall to see if that was the issue. Still doesn't work. I can see stats on ethmon, but I can't tell ethmon to restart my rig. It is very important I have control via ethmon, as I have over 40 rigs. Whats going on?
For my farm, v8.0 seems to have broken the communications between my miners and ethmon. Everything is in read-only mode, even when I specify the correct -mport settings. I have checked all firewall settings, including application-specific settings, and everything is normal. I've even disabled the firewall to see if that was the issue. Still doesn't work. I can see stats on ethmon, but I can't tell ethmon to restart my rig. It is very important I have control via ethmon, as I have over 40 rigs. Whats going on?
Ppl had the same problem after the launching of v8. Claymore did some changes and reuploaded the miner. Try to download the miner again and try, should be workinng correctly.....
2Gb version not necessary,
I have HD7850 1Gb it work fine 95sol on v8
I have HD7850 1Gb it work fine 95sol on v8
the HD 7870 is based from the AMD Pitcairn family of chips. The AMD 7870, AMD8870 and AMD 270x are the same chip but with different DirectX requirments.. The AMD HD 7750 is from the Cape Verde chips which is only 512 shaders in therory should be at 40s/h using V8 on zcash if you have the 2gb verison
Claymore v8
Windows 7
Catalyst 15.12
HIS IceQ HD 7870 (the huge-blower-style thing)
Afterburner settings (I prefer the custom fan profile option but do have -tt 5 set to keep an eye on temps)
900/1450 clock
-20 power limit (lowest it will go)
appx. 110 h/s (I'm guessing h/s is actually solutions/sec)
Clock anywhere from 900 to 1020 had no noticeable effect on hashrate, maxing out memory clock from the 1250 stock added about 10 h/s
Card mis-identifies as a "R9 270/270x" in the miner but that's the AMD "recycled most of the HD 78xx/79xx cards to become R9 2xx cards" generational shuffle at work and is not an issue that needs addressing.
Same card managed 10.5 Mh/s on Ethereum while running noticeably hotter.
I was hoping to run the R9 280x that was originally in this rig but it appears to have died during my last move.
Looks like time to reconfigure a couple rigs, 1x R9 280x and 1x R9 290 doesn't seem like a good choice any more on 2 of my old "spare parts" rigs.
It would be interesting to see what my HD 7750s would manage but it looks like they don't have enough RAM to run this?
Windows 7
Catalyst 15.12
HIS IceQ HD 7870 (the huge-blower-style thing)
Afterburner settings (I prefer the custom fan profile option but do have -tt 5 set to keep an eye on temps)
900/1450 clock
-20 power limit (lowest it will go)
appx. 110 h/s (I'm guessing h/s is actually solutions/sec)
Clock anywhere from 900 to 1020 had no noticeable effect on hashrate, maxing out memory clock from the 1250 stock added about 10 h/s
Card mis-identifies as a "R9 270/270x" in the miner but that's the AMD "recycled most of the HD 78xx/79xx cards to become R9 2xx cards" generational shuffle at work and is not an issue that needs addressing.
Same card managed 10.5 Mh/s on Ethereum while running noticeably hotter.
I was hoping to run the R9 280x that was originally in this rig but it appears to have died during my last move.
Looks like time to reconfigure a couple rigs, 1x R9 280x and 1x R9 290 doesn't seem like a good choice any more on 2 of my old "spare parts" rigs.
It would be interesting to see what my HD 7750s would manage but it looks like they don't have enough RAM to run this?
Some hash/ watt numbers from a single 295x2. At the wall only that one card connected to psu.
275s/s 180w
290s/s 195w
365s/s 230w
480s/s 350w
500s/s 400w
560s/s 560w (default for that card)
High and low end numbers could be better but I am more interested in that 200-400w zone. Also it is not that gpu alone, mb+ddr+cpu+os+riser+pcie slot combo still does something to equihash performance.
275s/s 180w
290s/s 195w
365s/s 230w
480s/s 350w
500s/s 400w
560s/s 560w (default for that card)
High and low end numbers could be better but I am more interested in that 200-400w zone. Also it is not that gpu alone, mb+ddr+cpu+os+riser+pcie slot combo still does something to equihash performance.
Thanks for posting. I'm getting 495Sol/s with stock clocks, powlim 0, default parameters (-i 4, etc), Crimson 16.9.2. What are you using?
Radeon 7850 2GB - 110 H/S
R7 370 - 122 H/S
R9 7970/280x HACKED BIOS - 220 H/s
Radeon 7950 - 200 H/s
R9 290 Stilt bios - 280 H/s
Worst is ....
RX 470 4GB - 180 H/s
R7 370 - 122 H/S
R9 7970/280x HACKED BIOS - 220 H/s
Radeon 7950 - 200 H/s
R9 290 Stilt bios - 280 H/s
Worst is ....
RX 470 4GB - 180 H/s
For rx 470 what memory and gpu clock please say I'm just 167H/s claymore v8
v8
3x r9 390x 900H/s
3x 480 8gb 600H/s
1.5kH/s 1200w
3x r9 390x 900H/s
3x 480 8gb 600H/s
1.5kH/s 1200w
a little over 1 hour of mining with CM v8.
7 x RX 480 8GB ASUS Strix - stock clocks and Roms
MSI Z97 motherboard
Intel Celeron 1840
8GB RAM
USB3 powered risers
Windows 10
20GB Page file (manual)
intensity -i 6
eVGA 1600 psu
1081 Watts (average at wall)
GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #6: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1372.253 H/s, Total Shares: 5494, Rejected: 14, Time: 01:10
ZEC: GPU0 192.734 H/s, GPU1 197.576 H/s, GPU2 196.919 H/s, GPU3 195.264 H/s, GPU4 197.817 H/s, GPU5 195.069 H/s, GPU6 196.874 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x00418937 (diff: 1000H)
GPU0 t=54C fan=46%
Great Work Claymore!!! Looks great so far - Averaging about 196 H/s with stock RX 480
7 x RX 480 8GB ASUS Strix - stock clocks and Roms
MSI Z97 motherboard
Intel Celeron 1840
8GB RAM
USB3 powered risers
Windows 10
20GB Page file (manual)
intensity -i 6
eVGA 1600 psu
1081 Watts (average at wall)
GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #6: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1372.253 H/s, Total Shares: 5494, Rejected: 14, Time: 01:10
ZEC: GPU0 192.734 H/s, GPU1 197.576 H/s, GPU2 196.919 H/s, GPU3 195.264 H/s, GPU4 197.817 H/s, GPU5 195.069 H/s, GPU6 196.874 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x00418937 (diff: 1000H)
GPU0 t=54C fan=46%
Great Work Claymore!!! Looks great so far - Averaging about 196 H/s with stock RX 480
R9 280X *6
Error message:
10:35:21:595 ff4 got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595 ff4 buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}
10:35:21:595 ff4 parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596 ff4 ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!
10:35:21:596 ff4 new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132 c38 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da
V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?
Error message:
10:35:21:595 ff4 got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595 ff4 buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}
10:35:21:595 ff4 parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596 ff4 ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!
10:35:21:596 ff4 new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132 c38 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da
V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?
I have the same problem.
Your intensity is set too high, I get more hashrate if I set it at 4 or 6 intensity but more GPU #0 returned incorrect data!, I use -i 2 with no problems and it never gets them and is stable as anything.
210sol/s with 280x stock everything besides intensity
R9 280X *6
Error message:
10:35:21:595 ff4 got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595 ff4 buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}
10:35:21:595 ff4 parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596 ff4 ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!
10:35:21:596 ff4 new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132 c38 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da
V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?
Error message:
10:35:21:595 ff4 got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595 ff4 buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}
10:35:21:595 ff4 parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596 ff4 ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!
10:35:21:596 ff4 new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132 c38 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da
V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?
I have the same problem.
Rx 480 at 205 sol and 99w at gpu z
Rx 470 at 182 sol and 61w
-i is at 6
Total power draw is 330
Total hashing power is 387
Waiting for my usb risers so i can put more videocards in my mobo
can you please send me your 470 ROM ?Rx 470 at 182 sol and 61w
-i is at 6
Total power draw is 330
Total hashing power is 387
Waiting for my usb risers so i can put more videocards in my mobo
Would love to know how you did that too please?
Claymores V8.0 You've got to be kidding me, No Way !
I can't believe I am getting 210sol/s on my 280x, outstanding work Claymore !
I can't believe I am getting 210sol/s on my 280x, outstanding work Claymore !
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano =278 H/s 297 H/s !
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano =
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Best performer after v8, R9 Nano (HBM 8GB), 297 H/s !
using version 8 on a hp proliant dl385 g7 server using win 10pro and the newest crimson video driver , AMD 8870 is @ 100s/h (190w) and a R9 360 @ 57s/h (100w) for a avg of 150s/h (290w) total... wow best hash rates yet!!! good job claymore!!
and configured with stock settings and no overclock
and configured with stock settings and no overclock
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Hi can you tell what settings you use with the 290x? I'm getting about 250 H/s now with my 290x.
Thanks.
default settings but 290 and 290x has been zapped with Stilt BIOS mod.
R9 280X *6
Error message:
10:35:21:595 ff4 got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595 ff4 buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}
10:35:21:595 ff4 parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596 ff4 ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!
10:35:21:596 ff4 new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132 c38 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da
V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?
Error message:
10:35:21:595 ff4 got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595 ff4 buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}
10:35:21:595 ff4 parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596 ff4 ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!
10:35:21:596 ff4 new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132 c38 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606 e7c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379 ae4 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777 b5c GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da
V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?
I think it is cpu related, on my pentium 280x rig i had to turn -i 4 down to 2
Excellent speed increase for R9 2xx 3xx but not for RX 
RX 480 8GB = 200 H/s!!! For the fact that older cards have wider memory bandwidth, that's excellent. So PLS stop whining.On stock or modded BIOS?
and now we got less earning, next update we got less and less, fundamental things apply, old cards dominated again
why these guy happy? lololol
Basically, every update, we gain from the Linux/Nvidia miner that can compete for the moment.why these guy happy? lololol
you gain almost nothing because at least 90% are on windows and difficulty increases proportionally, therefore you get 15% of 10% or 1.5% gain.
zcash flyppol is freezer?
Works fine here. What are you trying to say? Details.
Jump to: