has anyone tinkered with the clock and gpu settings for a Sapphire 470 OC 4GB?
Currently getting 170h/s on stock everything and wondered what to tweak to try and improve hashrate
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 495. (Read 3839163 times)
anyone messed with clock and memory on RX480 8G? Max I can get is 190/s on reference ones
GPU clock @1400 should push past 200 sol/s
Some hash/ watt numbers from a single 295x2. At the wall only that one card connected to psu.
275s/s 180w
290s/s 195w
365s/s 230w
480s/s 350w
500s/s 400w
560s/s 560w (default for that card)
High and low end numbers could be better but I am more interested in that 200-400w zone. Also it is not that gpu alone, mb+ddr+cpu+os+riser+pcie slot combo still does something to equihash performance.
275s/s 180w
290s/s 195w
365s/s 230w
480s/s 350w
500s/s 400w
560s/s 560w (default for that card)
High and low end numbers could be better but I am more interested in that 200-400w zone. Also it is not that gpu alone, mb+ddr+cpu+os+riser+pcie slot combo still does something to equihash performance.
anyone messed with clock and memory on RX480 8G? Max I can get is 190/s on reference ones
196H/s on XFX RX480 GTR XXX 8GB using -i 4 stock everything
How many sols on asus R9 290 on stock speed? Anyone?
anyone messed with clock and memory on RX480 8G? Max I can get is 190/s on reference ones
For those, who need comparison data and interested in Claymore miner progress 
power of the wall
vX - version of Zcash miner
-i 6
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 Power on v8
7870 115 95 65 55 40 35 32 110w
7950 190 155 125 95 70 45 38 140w
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48 150w
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32 100w
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51 165w
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32 130w
RX 470 4Gb 180 155 145 120 70 60 50 120w
power of the wall
vX - version of Zcash miner
-i 6
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 Power on v8
7870 115 95 65 55 40 35 32 110w
7950 190 155 125 95 70 45 38 140w
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48 150w
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32 100w
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51 165w
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32 130w
RX 470 4Gb 180 155 145 120 70 60 50 120w
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)
where did you get this grafic?
I built an API layer that allows me to switch between whatever (gpu) coin is (currently) the most profitable automatically.
The graphing is just a "nice to look at". I wouldn't mind people using it but I suspect it will land up being DDOS'd rather quickly.
would it be ok for me to use your API, if so how do I connect?
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
It's been said many times before, but we're also drowning out the CPUs aka botnets by making GPUs more faster.
It's squeezing out more and more miners since this is for a very specific build (windows, 64 bit, newer AMD cards). Not only that, it is making a few specific card models more profitable since each new version is raising the high hash card by more sol/s then the low hash cards. Incrementally a very specific mining machine build is becoming more profitable at the expense of other builds.
Wow! My old 7850 gives 91H/s now/. 
One or two gigabyte card?
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
actually nvidia are earning less because it is not on par with amd
dont remind me so, Amph.. please
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
Yes, but it's a thrill getting 20% bumps in hashrate 
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
actually nvidia are earning less because it is not on par with amd
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.
the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning.
I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s.
With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU.
But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU.
Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw.
3x r9 390 + 1x r9 290 = 1130w-1150w - 1120 h/s
3x r9 390 = 930w-950w - 885 h/s
3x r9 290 = 830w-850w - 725 h/s
in total 2730 h/s = 2890w - 2950w
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
Exept linux unsers
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
It's been said many times before, but we're also drowning out the CPUs aka botnets by making GPUs more faster.
Do you realize that we are all rising the hashrate, rising the diff, and then earning the same as before??
My Fury X have about 310H/s 😁
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
same problem, i have 2 Rigs 5x480 Nitro, and 4x480 Nitro sometimes fan up to 100%, reboot solve problem.
99% a riser problem
Wow! My old 7850 gives 91H/s now/.
Jump to: