Each rx 480 nitro gets about 195 H/S
~ 1.2 H/s/Watt
Execpt GPU 0 is always a bit higher like +5% than the other GPUs
Anybody know why?
Maybe because the monitor is plugged in there?
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 496. (Read 3839163 times)
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
same problem, i have 2 Rigs 5x480 Nitro, and 4x480 Nitro sometimes fan up to 100%, reboot solve problem.
Sometimes after few hours or days, with Claymore V7 or V8, One fan of my 6 RX 480 RIG, goes up to 95%, instead of 60%. A reboot solve the problem. Do you know why ?
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)
where did you get this grafic?
I built an API layer that allows me to switch between whatever (gpu) coin is (currently) the most profitable automatically.
The graphing is just a "nice to look at". I wouldn't mind people using it but I suspect it will land up being DDOS'd rather quickly.
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.
the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning.
I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s.
With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU.
But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU.
Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw.
i just burned a small psu in a rig with 8.0 which was fine with 7.0 (i knew it was at the brink of its capabilities).
No regrets.. it was an old one.
but beware: Definatly usage power increase in this version.
No regrets.. it was an old one.
but beware: Definatly usage power increase in this version.
Fyi xfx 480 8gig for $184 at Newegg when paid with amex
Hello Claymore
Please improve support to 16.x amd cards Thank you in advance
thank you
regards
Please improve support to 16.x amd cards Thank you in advance
thank you
regards
In what way? i'm using 16.11.x across all my RX480 and 290x and Claymore miner works great.
Pulling 1560w to get just over 1800 sol/s on my 290x rig 
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.
the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning.
I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s.
With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU.
But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU.
Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw.
Hello Claymore
Please improve support to 16.x amd cards Thank you in advance
thank you
regards
Please improve support to 16.x amd cards Thank you in advance
thank you
regards
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
RX 480 = 172 H/s
2*200 H/s from both RX480's (reference and Gigabyte G1). Stock GPU freq/voltage, 2100Mhz / "1750->2000" strap RAM. So far so good. v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
RX 480 = 172 H/s
someone with electricity info zec/eth?
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.
the 390 cards take the bully pulpit by storm 
Breaking 305 h/s on my xfx 390x's. It's the 1060mhz 8gb ones.
I do have something odd happen on some rigs. Tahitis with3gb ram. Some will do intensity 6 some say not enough ram setting intensity 5. I've ran the usual setx commands. Not really an issue persay. Overall excellent improvements. Thanks claymore
Edit. Figured it out. Those rigs that set intensity 5 on tahiti 3gb have the dummy plug in them. So I assume it uses a bit too much ram for display purposes.
BR
the 390 cards take the bully pulpit by storm
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)
where did you get this grafic?
Getting 1320 H/s with my RX 470 rig.
GREAT V8.0 Claymore!
GREAT V8.0 Claymore!
Bravo Claymore!
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!
Updates:
R9 290 = 268 H/s
R9 290x = 278 H/s
RX 480 = 172 H/s
R9 Nano = 278 H/s
R7 370 = 110 H/s
Have to love v8: (6 x RX480s)
Jump to: