I wonder if its your ETH bios settings.
I edited original stock BIOS of each card with timings, so ALL setting are stock (~1200 core/ 6600 memory).
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 497. (Read 3839163 times)
I edited original stock BIOS of each card with timings, so ALL setting are stock (~1200 core/ 6600 memory).
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress 
vX - version of Zcash miner
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
vX - version of Zcash miner
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8.
What level -i are you using and are you using the -nofee switch?
I can get 170h/s with fee enable and about 158 with the fee switched off using -i6.
Anyone in their right mind would not use the -nofee option, it's slower than with the fee......
I agree but just wanted to check the speed difference.
NO additional settings exept pool, -tt and -mport
Different Vendors (Gigabyte, Powercolor, ASUS) all stock, but BIOS mod timings (was done for ETH).
P.S. That feeling when you accidentally post message while editing it, fix errors, but people start quoting unedited message
I wonder if its your ETH bios settings.
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress
vX - version of Zcash miner
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
vX - version of Zcash miner
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8.
What level -i are you using and are you using the -nofee switch?
I can get 170h/s with fee enable and about 158 with the fee switched off using -i6.
Anyone in their right mind would not use the -nofee option, it's slower than with the fee......
I agree but just wanted to check the speed difference.
NO additional settings exept pool, -tt and -mport
Different Vendors (Gigabyte, Powercolor, ASUS) all stock, but BIOS mod timings (was done for ETH).
P.S. That feeling when you accidentally post message while editing it, fix errors, but people start quoting unedited message. So you quote their message and fix your quote text in their quote
Good day.
Over which version of miners now you're working on?
Over which version of miners now you're working on?
please release a linux version. you could even take a higer devfee.
optimier is not as good as your miners
optimier is not as good as your miners
A Linux version is probably not on the near horizon as he has stated he does not like Linux.
one reason is you need Ubuntu 16 to run these cards at there best, the problem and that's on AMD some cards still don't have AMDPROGPU drivers support for Ubuntu 16 once they do we will probable see a Linux version of CM . and it's not worth it to run two different version of CM in Linux form one with Ubuntu 16 and one with Ubuntu 14 , I'm sure he would use 14 over 15 i wouldn't, i would use 15 it seems more stable then 14 but that's me, all because of AMD driver support while the windows drivers support all cards and windows version but a few that no long have a use or are actually sold as new and may be no win xp support.
I don't care much for Linux either ,windows is so much easier to use . but I do like to use Linux on PI type PC over the windows version for PI type PC.
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8.
What level -i are you using and are you using the -nofee switch?
I can get 170h/s with fee enable and about 158 with the fee switched off using -i6.
Anyone in their right mind would not use the -nofee option, it's slower than with the fee......
I agree but just wanted to check the speed difference.
please release a linux version. you could even take a higer devfee.
optimier is not as good as your miners
optimier is not as good as your miners
A Linux version is probably not on the near horizon as he has stated he does not like Linux.
5x rx 480 4gb underclocked
~140 h/s each
~700h/s // 430W at the wall
Thank you claymore
~140 h/s each
~700h/s // 430W at the wall
Thank you claymore
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8.
What level -i are you using and are you using the -nofee switch?
I can get 170h/s with fee enable and about 158 with the fee switched off using -i6.
Anyone in their right mind would not use the -nofee option, it's slower than with the fee......
Thanks Claymore
I have four cards. three card give roughly 160-180. but one card give 45 h/s. All the cards are 480 4gb and 8gb. I swipe the riser but did not help.
Any idea
Thanks,
I see people recommending the display emulators and was wondering if the end of a cheap hdmi wire would suffice?
I can pick one up for £1 and that would give me two ends to effectively plug in.
does not work as intented ... you need an edid simulation for the card to recognize a 'display'
ah thanks, just wondered if I could cut the costs a little if I encountered this problem
Ok good , now stop .
Work on Nvidia .
Work on Nvidia .
Nvidia architecture is almost always inferior to AMD when it comes to mining. Also no real reason to develop a miner or optimize it for maybe 10% of the market of mining equipment.
Thanks Claymore
I have four cards. three card give roughly 160-180. but one card give 45 h/s. All the cards are 480 4gb and 8gb. I swipe the riser but did not help.
Any idea
Thanks,
Thanks Claymore
I have four cards. three card give roughly 160-180. but one card give 45 h/s. All the cards are 480 4gb and 8gb. I swipe the riser but did not help.
Any idea
Thanks,
I see people recommending the display emulators and was wondering if the end of a cheap hdmi wire would suffice?
I can pick one up for £1 and that would give me two ends to effectively plug in.
does not work as intented ... you need an edid simulation for the card to recognize a 'display'
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8.
What level -i are you using and are you using the -nofee switch?
I can get 170h/s with fee enable and about 158 with the fee switched off using -i6.
Thanks Claymore
I have four cards. three card give roughly 160-180. but one card give 45 h/s. All the cards are 480 4gb and 8gb. I swipe the riser but did not help.
Any idea
Thanks,
I see people recommending the display emulators and was wondering if the end of a cheap hdmi wire would suffice?
I can pick one up for £1 and that would give me two ends to effectively plug in.
For those, who need comparison data and inerested in Claymore miner progress
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
GPU v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2
7870 110 95 65 55 40 35 32
7950 180 155 125 95 70 45 38
7970 200 165 120 95 65 55 48
270x 115 100 67 55 40 35 32
280x 200 165 125 90 65 60 51
285 125 110 85 70 40 36 32
RX 470 4Gb 175 155 145 120 70 60 50
Could you share RX 470 config. Mine just 152 on V8.
Thanks Claymore
I have four cards. three card give roughly 160-180. but one card give 45 h/s. All the cards are 480 4gb and 8gb. I swipe the riser but did not help.
Any idea
Thanks,
startum socket failed ?
How do you disable read-only mode? I have tried both -mport 3333 and -mport -3333, yet the miner remains read-only
You need to download the latest version.
You have to download v8 again. There was a bug in -mport which has been fixed.
Ok good , now stop .
Work on Nvidia .
Work on Nvidia .
Hahahah, Nvidia will wait Spring 2017. The Way It's Meant to be Played | NVIDIA
Cya next year
neko ko ce nego balkanska budala
Jump to: