Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 594.

aaronsace

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: good13 on November 14, 2016, 12:01:54 PM

I've got some strange behavior of the miner while tested v5.0.
Miner detected all my cards but used only first one.
Here is some piece of log.
17:30:47:046   283c   parse packet: 296
17:30:47:051   283c   new buf size: 0
17:30:47:056   283c   ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:47 - New job from zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666
17:30:47:061   283c   target: 0x00147ae1 (diff: 3200H)
17:30:47:066   283c   ZEC - Total Speed: 114.094 H/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
17:30:47:071   283c   ZEC: GPU0 114.094 H/s, GPU1 0.000 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 0.000 H/s, GPU4 0.000 H/s
17:30:48:934   1378   ZEC: put share nonce 21d
17:30:48:939   1378   ZEC round found 1 shares
17:30:48:945   283c   ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)

Does anybody have same problem?
On v3.1 all works fine with the same setup.

Please read previous posts. Run two separate windows.

good13

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

I've got some strange behavior of the miner while tested v5.0.
Miner detected all my cards but used only first one.
Here is some piece of log.
17:30:47:046   283c   parse packet: 296
17:30:47:051   283c   new buf size: 0
17:30:47:056   283c   ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:47 - New job from zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666
17:30:47:061   283c   target: 0x00147ae1 (diff: 3200H)
17:30:47:066   283c   ZEC - Total Speed: 114.094 H/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
17:30:47:071   283c   ZEC: GPU0 114.094 H/s, GPU1 0.000 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 0.000 H/s, GPU4 0.000 H/s
17:30:48:934   1378   ZEC: put share nonce 21d
17:30:48:939   1378   ZEC round found 1 shares
17:30:48:945   283c   ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)

Does anybody have same problem?
On v3.1 all works fine with the same setup.

Meech

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Quote from: CoRpO on November 14, 2016, 09:39:04 AM

Quote from: d57heinz on November 14, 2016, 09:35:26 AM

Quote from: denis1995 on November 14, 2016, 09:28:57 AM

Quote from: Reez on November 14, 2016, 09:22:01 AM

I have 5 rx 480 8 gb Sapphire and i get this error after 30 seconds of mining

Any idea to fix this problem?

Thanks!

Your addres is missing or
Something wrong with the addres check it in flypool they said only support with T try to create new bat file and try it again.

Try this. Zec.coinmine.pl:7007. I'm not at my pc but that addy looks wrong

Hey may want to mine zclassic intead of zcash (hence zcl instead of zec). But that should require -allcoins 1 or -nofee 1 to work

Edit: seems like -allcoins 1 is not avaible in this miner, thus you can't mine zcash derivates with it

It works just fine for classic.

Hotmetal

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: denis1995 on November 14, 2016, 10:48:42 AM

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 14, 2016, 10:37:42 AM

Quote from: d57heinz on November 14, 2016, 10:25:19 AM

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 14, 2016, 10:15:42 AM

Quote from: AriesIV10 on November 14, 2016, 10:10:15 AM

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

Well it won't be dead but it sure won't make much sense mining it. By tomorrow ZEC mining should no longer be as profitable as mining ETH/ETC

Except for when all this hr dumps back to eth etc. it too will take a plunge. All in all both coins will be tight on profitability after this.

You're forgetting about the CPU botnets that will continue to drive the ZEC price down.

Are.they only cpu? Probably is gpu

The botnets are CPU.

rampagePZ

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

I have a lot of errors "socket send failed 1054" (and sometimes 1038 also). I have this problem since 4.0 and now with 5.0 it still exist. I have this problem only on this machine the other 2 rigs are fine. I have tried with win 10 and 8.1 but nothing changed. Rig spec: Asrock H81 pro btc (with latest bios), 4GB RAM, 64 gb ssd, 2x470, 290 4gb and 380 3gb. If i start eth miner the problem still exist (ethermine.org). Any ideas?
http://prikachi.com/images/245/8957245m.jpg

denis1995

full member

Activity: 256

Merit: 100

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 14, 2016, 10:37:42 AM

Quote from: d57heinz on November 14, 2016, 10:25:19 AM

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 14, 2016, 10:15:42 AM

Quote from: AriesIV10 on November 14, 2016, 10:10:15 AM

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

Well it won't be dead but it sure won't make much sense mining it. By tomorrow ZEC mining should no longer be as profitable as mining ETH/ETC

Except for when all this hr dumps back to eth etc. it too will take a plunge. All in all both coins will be tight on profitability after this.

You're forgetting about the CPU botnets that will continue to drive the ZEC price down.

Are.they only cpu? Probably is gpu

Tmdz

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Etherion on November 14, 2016, 10:13:41 AM

Quote from: lexele on November 14, 2016, 09:46:07 AM

The BIG problem with zcash right now, is that it's not working...What I mean is without the Z adresses actually usable, the coin is worthless.

That is so true. If the developer can get it to work then the price will go up again.

It's amazing, they get 20% of our fee and they sit around with their thumb up their ass. GET TO WORK you lazy devs..

Hotmetal

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: d57heinz on November 14, 2016, 10:25:19 AM

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 14, 2016, 10:15:42 AM

Quote from: AriesIV10 on November 14, 2016, 10:10:15 AM

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

Well it won't be dead but it sure won't make much sense mining it. By tomorrow ZEC mining should no longer be as profitable as mining ETH/ETC

Except for when all this hr dumps back to eth etc. it too will take a plunge. All in all both coins will be tight on profitability after this.

You're forgetting about the CPU botnets that will continue to drive the ZEC price down.

ryantc

sr. member

Activity: 329

Merit: 250

Bitcoin may be the TCP/IP of money.

this is amazing,
my 7970s is doing 80+ and my 7950s is doing 70 Grin

d57heinz

legendary

Activity: 1453

Merit: 1011

Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 14, 2016, 10:15:42 AM

Quote from: AriesIV10 on November 14, 2016, 10:10:15 AM

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

Well it won't be dead but it sure won't make much sense mining it. By tomorrow ZEC mining should no longer be as profitable as mining ETH/ETC

Except for when all this hr dumps back to eth etc. it too will take a plunge. All in all both coins will be tight on profitability after this.

d57heinz

legendary

Activity: 1453

Merit: 1011

Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks

Quote from: qqqq on November 14, 2016, 09:56:09 AM

Two instances of miner in same time solve the issue for 2x Nano and 3xR9 290 in ver 5.0 But i got this on one...

Code:

server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port is busy, use different -mport value), next attempt in 10sec...

Maybe i need unique workers name for that one ?

No guys it not helping me. Too much GPU incorrect data when bot are mining. When close one the second back to normal.

Add -mport 0 to one of your bats. if you need monitoring putting any port other than 3333 will solve that issue

BR

CoRpO

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: CoRpO on November 14, 2016, 09:39:04 AM

Hey may want to mine zclassic intead of zcash (hence zcl instead of zec). But that should require -allcoins 1 or -nofee 1 to work

Edit: seems like -allcoins 1 is not avaible in this miner, thus you can't mine zcash derivates with it

no prob on suprnova, both zec and zcl, and allpools option is working (what is "allcoins" option btw ?) ..

It's what's needed with Claymore's eth miner to mine EXP or ETC (related to devfee)

Hotmetal

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: AriesIV10 on November 14, 2016, 10:10:15 AM

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

Well it won't be dead but it sure won't make much sense mining it. By tomorrow ZEC mining should no longer be as profitable as mining ETH/ETC

ivcelmik

sr. member

Activity: 519

Merit: 250

Quote from: AriesIV10 on November 14, 2016, 10:10:15 AM

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

))

Etherion

sr. member

Activity: 512

Merit: 260

Quote from: lexele on November 14, 2016, 09:46:07 AM

The BIG problem with zcash right now, is that it's not working...What I mean is without the Z adresses actually usable, the coin is worthless.

That is so true. If the developer can get it to work then the price will go up again.

AriesIV10

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1006

Mine for a Bit

ZEC below $100 will it be dead by Wednesday?

qqqq

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1011

Two instances of miner in same time solve the issue for 2x Nano and 3xR9 290 in ver 5.0 But i got this on one...

Code:

server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port is busy, use different -mport value), next attempt in 10sec...

Maybe i need unique workers name for that one ?

No guys it not helping me. Too much GPU incorrect data when bot are mining. When close one the second back to normal.

d57heinz

legendary

Activity: 1453

Merit: 1011

Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks

Quote from: CoRpO on November 14, 2016, 09:39:04 AM

Quote from: d57heinz on November 14, 2016, 09:35:26 AM

Quote from: denis1995 on November 14, 2016, 09:28:57 AM

Quote from: Reez on November 14, 2016, 09:22:01 AM

I have 5 rx 480 8 gb Sapphire and i get this error after 30 seconds of mining

Any idea to fix this problem?

Thanks!

Your addres is missing or
Something wrong with the addres check it in flypool they said only support with T try to create new bat file and try it again.

Try this. Zec.coinmine.pl:7007. I'm not at my pc but that addy looks wrong

Hey may want to mine zclassic intead of zcash (hence zcl instead of zec). But that should require -allcoins 1 or -nofee 1 to work

Edit: seems like -allcoins 1 is not avaible in this miner, thus you can't mine zcash derivates with it

Ahh I see my mistake. You are correct. I wasn't aware of the zcl pool on coinmine.

BR

lexele

full member

Activity: 190

Merit: 100

Quote from: forato on November 14, 2016, 07:54:02 AM

Quote from: lexele on November 14, 2016, 07:34:58 AM

Quote from: Ale-x on November 14, 2016, 06:38:09 AM

Quote from: adaseb on November 13, 2016, 03:50:27 PM

Should bounce from here. Very low risk/High Reward trade.

Thank you, bro. I've lost 20% today

After seing his post I went to see the definiton of the bull flag: It's the other way round when the waves are going up, whille the zec waves aregoing down => It should continue falling (probably very fast from here, confidence is gone after support on 130 was lost but I'm not an analyst, just my opinion)

Most of guys here like to mine at flypool (me also).. But with this scenario (ZEC looks like is going to die) i am mining at NiceHash (becouse it is in BTC auto trade) and maybe soon i will go back to ETH..

The BIG problem with zcash right now, is that it's not working...What I mean is without the Z adresses actually usable, the coin is worthless.

arielbit

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1059

Quote from: Claymore on November 14, 2016, 03:10:26 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: disman on November 14, 2016, 01:29:26 AM

What do you rejoice? It is advantageous when your speed is higher than the other. And when the rate rises in all, you are in relation to other, standing pat are.

It just kills the coin.

Exactly - the only one actually making money is Claymore xD

If you check history, my miner is not x3 faster than others, I just see how fast others miners and release a bit faster version. This time I have to release faster version due to new miner. If people stop this speed racing I'll stop it too, but you know it won't work

Also do note my miner is not for NVidia, not for CPU and not for Linux, so if I release miner with x2 speed, network difficult is not going to raise x2 too.

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 594. (Read 3839163 times)