Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 640. (Read 3839163 times)

full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
hi

sorry guys, dont have time to read 122 pages of posts.

is a release for linux/ubuntu available,if so can sum 1 pls post the link

thanks

yes, v1.1 is the latest from claymore for Linux, he suggests using mrb's miner for Linux at this point.
Next time check op first
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
Ok i think i have found the sweet spot about power consumption and h/s for my 6x RX 480 REF stock BIOS, only overclocking/undervolting adjust :

405-420 H/s and 690-700W at the wall, maybe more if Mr Claymore can go up the hashes again with the miner Cheesy

Cheers.
legendary
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
Code:
for GPU 0, close miner right now if you want to use default control from catalyst

what does this means ?
I updated 8 rigs with 3 xfx rx480 8G on each to v4 and only one gets this and closes the miner

hi

sorry guys, dont have time to read 122 pages of posts.

is a release for linux/ubuntu available,if so can sum 1 pls post the link

thanks

nope Sad
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
hi

sorry guys, dont have time to read 122 pages of posts.

is a release for linux/ubuntu available,if so can sum 1 pls post the link

thanks
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I agree I have no problem paying claymore the dev fee that's his pay for providing some of the best most stable mining programs out I own a flooring company and I no how it feels for ppl to think I can work for free or want to beat me down on pricing it's bullshit u don't want to pay the fee use a different miner

Completely agree.  Claymore, you should remove option in future versions to disable your dev fee.  Your miner is beating the shit out of every other public miner, and you should get your 2.5%.  If those greedy assholes don't like, they can continue to run v4.0 and disable the fee.

Agree with that here to !!!
He deserve to be paid for his skills!

That's right. Claymore, come back mandatory fee. You deserve 2.5% for your work.

Likewise, I can't believe people have the nerve to complain about a dev fee. People deserve to be paid for their work.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
For the first time i have some problems with claymores miner.
I had no time for upgrades and using 1.1 for now and it works flawless.
No i've tried to run 4.0 (just copied config and added -i 2 to it) and got such error:
Code:
00:07:11:462 1230 This pool (equihash.eu.nicehash.com) does not support ZCash addresses as login (or requires worker name in "Login.Worker" format) and cannot be used for devfee mining, therefore it is not supported.
00:07:11:467 1230 However, you can mine on this pool if you specify "-allpools 1" option, default pools (different from this pool) will be used for devfee.
So i've tried to set allpools 1 and got this:
Code:
00:10:08:575 23ec OpenCL error 0 #101 - -61
And gpu seems does not want to hash
If i remove -i 2 it works but speeb is about 0.2 h/s
Switched back to 1.1, but now getting about 10% rejects.
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1141
Do you have CPU miner for ZEC?
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
I agree I have no problem paying claymore the dev fee that's his pay for providing some of the best most stable mining programs out I own a flooring company and I no how it feels for ppl to think I can work for free or want to beat me down on pricing it's bullshit u don't want to pay the fee use a different miner

Completely agree.  Claymore, you should remove option in future versions to disable your dev fee.  Your miner is beating the shit out of every other public miner, and you should get your 2.5%.  If those greedy assholes don't like, they can continue to run v4.0 and disable the fee.

Agree with that here to !!!
He deserve to be paid for his skills!

That's right. Claymore, come back mandatory fee. You deserve 2.5% for your work.

Agreed fuck the cheapskates, feel free to mine 20% slower with some other miner if you don't think 2.5% is worth it.
hero member
Activity: 711
Merit: 500
I agree I have no problem paying claymore the dev fee that's his pay for providing some of the best most stable mining programs out I own a flooring company and I no how it feels for ppl to think I can work for free or want to beat me down on pricing it's bullshit u don't want to pay the fee use a different miner

Completely agree.  Claymore, you should remove option in future versions to disable your dev fee.  Your miner is beating the shit out of every other public miner, and you should get your 2.5%.  If those greedy assholes don't like, they can continue to run v4.0 and disable the fee.

Agree with that here to !!!
He deserve to be paid for his skills!

That's right. Claymore, come back mandatory fee. You deserve 2.5% for your work.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Well, I am tunning my miner and when I set the variables:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

And then the miner keep crashing.

Error: GPU 0, GpuMiner kx(2) failed -36

GPU 0: R9 380X 4GB
GPU 1: R9 270 2GB


Help  Undecided Undecided
hero member
Activity: 711
Merit: 500
Great work @Claymore

My dev fee will always remain ON!

Thanks!
That's right. The same goes for me. Claymore you are legend mining and  Crypto developer for the masses. Against you speak only owners of private miners and inhumane and greedy developers. People are with you, go ahead. You  to live 100 years and you to built the most advanced mining software Cool.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Thank you Claymore!!!


I went from ~600h/s on Saturday to 1090h/s today (18GPU's, wild mix of 280(x),290(x), 380 and 3x470!!!

Keep up the good work!

Fee will stay on, you deserve it!!!

Thank you!

Daniel
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
Thank You Claymore!
[/quoteDevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:43 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:44 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:45 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (157 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (157 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:51 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (157 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (172 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:54 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:54 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (157 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
DevFee: ZEC: Share accepted (156 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: 11/10/16-16:38:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0) thank him like this
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
I was really surprised by 3.1, but 4.0 is even faster!
70 Solves/s Non modded RX 480 Nitro's.
If you flash a bios with a mem voltage high enough to be stable at 2250MHz, you get an extra 5-8Solves/s.


The miner has come a long way from 30S/s to 70 Cheesy!
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
Getting this error all the time on different pools. What is it ?

server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port is busy, use different -mport value), next attempt in 10sec...



help pls
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Thank you for this miner!!

Can someone tell me if my values are normal?

I'm using 2 GPU's (GPU 0: R9 380X 4GB, GPU 1: R9 270 2GB), my CPU is a FX 6300 stock mining with 4 threads, using ~80%. I'm using -i 2 for both cards. My MB is a 970A-SLI-Krait-Edition.

My values are:

GPU 0 (380X): 44 H/s
GPU 1 (270): 41 H/s

My 280x GPU is seeing between 65-70+ sol/s with the claymore's 4.0 AMD miner on stock clock/memory and -i 0

Wich OS are you using? And driver version? I'm currently on Windows 10 64 Bits, Crimson 16.9.2. 380X is stock, 270 is with slight overclock.
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
I dont understand why my amd 480 nitro+ 4gb , with intel i5 3570k , have only 65 h/s on windows 10 x64 .

I read 75 - 80 h/s in some post of this thread .

Anyone help me pls ? .

Overclock your processor
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
Thank You Claymore!
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
I get about 42/44 on my r9 380 as well...

Thank you for this miner!!

Can someone tell me if my values are normal?

I'm using 2 GPU's (GPU 0: R9 380X 4GB, GPU 1: R9 270 2GB), my CPU is a FX 6300 stock mining with 4 threads, using ~80%. I'm using -i 2 for both cards. My MB is a 970A-SLI-Krait-Edition.

My values are:

GPU 0 (380X): 44 H/s
GPU 1 (270): 41 H/s
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
How to check how much power my rig is pulling from wall?

one of these is great to use they don't cost much but only work in 110 lines you can search the UK site for one that works on 240 line but good luck getting it shipped to the US if that's were you live . some kind safely issue won't allow it .


https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=kill-a-watt+meters&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=31006933645&hvpos=1t1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=17391202976933736560&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9007872&hvtargid=kwd-6896404661&ref=pd_sl_6pbqdkbvd3_b


my bad

https://www.amazon.com/Electric-Meter-100A-Volt-3-Wire/dp/B00GMZRXE8/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&qid=1478811987&sr=8-12&keywords=kill-a-watt+meters this one will work on a 240 is buy able in the US now .

but direct pulling into a 240 so far there is not one that it buy able in the US the buy able US sold one only plug in to a 110 wall plug the above monitors your hole house.

Need to find one workig with 220-240 as i leave in EU and need for 2 pin plug.. thanks to all who reply
Jump to: