i am using 5* rx 480 saphire OC nitro 8gb
with claymore 4.0 i have around 350/360 H/s and around 570 W on the wall (this was with 3.1,so for 4.1 i need to cheak it later).
my TEMP is 40-45 C on every GPU, FAN speed on 60-70%.
I am using celeron G1840 procesor. If i change to for exampe i5,will be worth the swich? how much i can exppect more? When i try with curent CPU claminer option 2. i got 15 more h/s, but after few minutes went 50 H/s down.
Is there any specially bios for Zach for my card? i saw, that some are getiing around 80 per card. Is there mainly the CPU differency or? mostly have temp higer then me..Temporary i am using bios, which i instaled when i mined ethereum.
Good job claymore. There is a clearly WIN WIN situation, so people,please stop compling about devfee.
I also saw in this tread, that someone said that flypool and nanopool is no good. Any better option?
thank for help!
wish you good minining.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 644. (Read 3839201 times)
Got many rejects on one my farm, on one card. Configuration: 2*7950, 1 270x.
270x provides alot of rejects and it appears after other GPU submit share:
Try to change 270x to 7870 - same issue.
Try to run 2 instances of zecminer with -di 01 and -di 2 - it solves!
But unable to monitor this last card, unfortunatelly.
270x provides alot of rejects and it appears after other GPU submit share:
Code:
22:28:07:859 854 ZEC: 11/10/16-22:28:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
22:28:07:860 854 send share: {"id": 4, "method": "mining.submit", "params": ["Miner5","73e169787f1d87c9adbf","49ca2458","400500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","fd40050178b5397
22:28:07:916 854 got 23 bytes
22:28:07:916 854 buf: {"id":4,"result":true}
22:28:07:916 854 parse packet: 22
22:28:07:916 854 ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
22:28:07:917 854 new buf size: 0
22:28:08:858 398 ZEC: put share nonce 3fa
22:28:08:859 398 ZEC round found 1 shares
22:28:08:860 854 ZEC: 11/10/16-22:28:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
22:28:08:860 854 send share: {"id": 4, "method": "mining.submit", "params": ["Miner5","73e169787f1d87c9adbf","49ca2458","fa0300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","fd40050046a8f5d
22:28:08:915 854 got 57 bytes
22:28:08:915 854 buf: {"id":4,"result": null,"error": [22, "Duplicate share"]}
22:28:08:915 854 parse packet: 52
22:28:08:915 854 ZEC: Share rejected (47 ms)!
Try to change 270x to 7870 - same issue.
Try to run 2 instances of zecminer with -di 01 and -di 2 - it solves!
But unable to monitor this last card, unfortunatelly.
I always assumed it was impossible to reverse engineer an EXE File back to the source code.
EXE is the least issue when you want to disassemble.The real deal is OpenCL kernel which does the horse power
Still cant get anything over 2.1 to be stable. Consistent "thread_stuck_in_device" blue screens. 
Superb work Claymore !
47 Sol on R7 370
72 Sol on 7950
and 67 Sol on RX470 8Gb
Thanks you.
47 Sol on R7 370
72 Sol on 7950
and 67 Sol on RX470 8Gb
Thanks you.
7950 72sol? how thats posible what brand moded bios?
Gigabyte 7970 ver 2.0: 1000/1375 run 55 h/s
MSI 7950 twinforce III: 950/1250 run 70 h/s
Why ? please help me install the gigabyte7970 run maxspeed, thanks !
MSI 7950 twinforce III: 950/1250 run 70 h/s
Why ? please help me install the gigabyte7970 run maxspeed, thanks !
I always assumed it was impossible to reverse engineer an EXE File back to the source code.
It's not about money, there are several reasons why I'm not going to release ZCash miner for Linux in near future - most of haters who say that I stole SA engine are on Linux so let's they use some different miner. Also I don't like to see as someone applies IDA to my miner to see how it works. Also I don't like Linux, it's a pain for me.
NVidia: if I release miner for NVidia, these haters will again say that I stole SA engine. So there will not be NVidia version.
I think other devs will create public miners with similar speed for Linux and NVidia soon.
NVidia: if I release miner for NVidia, these haters will again say that I stole SA engine. So there will not be NVidia version.
I think other devs will create public miners with similar speed for Linux and NVidia soon.
IDA doesn't just work on Linux binaries. Can disassemble Windows executables as well quite easily (as you probably know).
Anyways, no one really cares about the fact that you used SA code. People were up in arms that there
was no credit given or that the license wasn't followed. Just as having to pay a dev-fee is the
"right thing to do", same logic applies to giving credit etc.
The topic should be done with now because it's over and dealt with. Let's all move on.
Keep up the great work.
Anyone have any results with the MSI RX 470 GPUs?
Hey Aries... I just started running 4.0 on my rig a few minutes ago and am getting 62-67 per MSI 470 4GB on my rig. As you might remember, I tried to model my GPU mods after yours. I got 2 of them close to your results but haven't been able to get the other 2 over 1900 Mhz. Given this, I would expect your 470 rig will get a minimum of 66-67 per GPU with v4.0.
Edit: forgot to mention... this is only at intensity setting of "1". Not sure how much more you can get from setting to "2" but I am trying to get my rig as stable as possible before leaving for vacation so don't want to push it too hard.
Thank You!
I did try -i 1 and 2 with less favorable results. The best I can do is 66MHs with not adding the -i settings; hense, "0"
I am getting an overall 399MHs with 6 MSI RX470 4gb Strapped and OC's 2000 and 1150 for settings. 767watts at the wall.
You can lower to get 600 watts at the wall.
Running great on all my rigs. Fantastic work!
[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
Hi.[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
wich motherboard you use?
thank you
I stick to MSI. That particular rig is either a Z77-GD65 or Z87-GD65.
Any board with 7 PCI-e slots will work, really. I keep an eye out for them on my local classifieds. I'm in Canada, so unfortunately have no idea where you might source them in Norway.
thank you:) Canada are wonderful country- been there:)
I hope to visit Norway (and Sweden) soon! Norway looks particularly incredible.
Running great on all my rigs. Fantastic work!
[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
Hi.[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
wich motherboard you use?
thank you
I stick to MSI. That particular rig is either a Z77-GD65 or Z87-GD65.
Any board with 7 PCI-e slots will work, really. I keep an eye out for them on my local classifieds. I'm in Canada, so unfortunately have no idea where you might source them in Norway.
thank you:) Canada are wonderful country- been there:)
Canada and Norway, clubbing baby seals to death for a better tomorrow.
you are welcome here- we have no walls here
get a room already.
Yeah, I'm sure your country is so much better and doesn't have any stupid things going on in it whatsoever.
500 Sol/s via 4x 390s and 2x nitro+ 470s!
You the man!
You the man!
Running great on all my rigs. Fantastic work!
[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
Hi.[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
wich motherboard you use?
thank you
I stick to MSI. That particular rig is either a Z77-GD65 or Z87-GD65.
Any board with 7 PCI-e slots will work, really. I keep an eye out for them on my local classifieds. I'm in Canada, so unfortunately have no idea where you might source them in Norway.
thank you:) Canada are wonderful country- been there:)
I hope to visit Norway (and Sweden) soon! Norway looks particularly incredible.
Running great on all my rigs. Fantastic work!
[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
Hi.[img]https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png[img]
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
wich motherboard you use?
thank you
I stick to MSI. That particular rig is either a Z77-GD65 or Z87-GD65.
Any board with 7 PCI-e slots will work, really. I keep an eye out for them on my local classifieds. I'm in Canada, so unfortunately have no idea where you might source them in Norway.
thank you:) Canada are wonderful country- been there:)
Canada and Norway, clubbing baby seals to death for a better tomorrow.
get a room already.
Yeah, I'm sure your country is so much better and doesn't have any stupid things going on in it whatsoever.
Anyone have any results with the MSI RX 470 GPUs?
Hey Aries... I just started running 4.0 on my rig a few minutes ago and am getting 62-67 per MSI 470 4GB on my rig. As you might remember, I tried to model my GPU mods after yours. I got 2 of them close to your results but haven't been able to get the other 2 over 1900 Mhz. Given this, I would expect your 470 rig will get a minimum of 66-67 per GPU with v4.0.
Edit: forgot to mention... this is only at intensity setting of "1". Not sure how much more you can get from setting to "2" but I am trying to get my rig as stable as possible before leaving for vacation so don't want to push it too hard.
Thank You!
I did try -i 1 and 2 with less favorable results. The best I can do is 66MHs with not adding the -i settings; hense, "0"
I am getting an overall 399MHs with 6 MSI RX470 4gb Strapped and OC's 2000 and 1150 for settings. 767watts at the wall.
@claymore - how much more RX 470/480 performance do you think you can squeeze out? Have you done any specific tuning for them?
To be fair those damn seals eat all the fish. We need to control them with clubs
I agree I have no problem paying claymore the dev fee that's his pay for providing some of the best most stable mining programs out I own a flooring company and I no how it feels for ppl to think I can work for free or want to beat me down on pricing it's bullshit u don't want to pay the fee use a different miner
Running great on all my rigs. Fantastic work!
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
Hi.Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
wich motherboard you use?
thank you
I stick to MSI. That particular rig is either a Z77-GD65 or Z87-GD65.
Any board with 7 PCI-e slots will work, really. I keep an eye out for them on my local classifieds. I'm in Canada, so unfortunately have no idea where you might source them in Norway.
thank you:) Canada are wonderful country- been there:)
Canada and Norway, clubbing baby seals to death for a better tomorrow.
get a room already.
Running great on all my rigs. Fantastic work!
https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
Hi.https://i.imgur.com/BzHJehD.png
Multiple rigs with same results as above. 7x 390x @ 1100/1500 for those wondering.
wich motherboard you use?
thank you
I stick to MSI. That particular rig is either a Z77-GD65 or Z87-GD65.
Any board with 7 PCI-e slots will work, really. I keep an eye out for them on my local classifieds. I'm in Canada, so unfortunately have no idea where you might source them in Norway.
thank you:) Canada are wonderful country- been there:)
Anyone have any results with the MSI RX 470 GPUs?
Hey Aries... I just started running 4.0 on my rig a few minutes ago and am getting 62-67 per MSI 470 4GB on my rig. As you might remember, I tried to model my GPU mods after yours. I got 2 of them close to your results but haven't been able to get the other 2 over 1900 Mhz. Given this, I would expect your 470 rig will get a minimum of 66-67 per GPU with v4.0.
Edit: forgot to mention... this is only at intensity setting of "1". Not sure how much more you can get from setting to "2" but I am trying to get my rig as stable as possible before leaving for vacation so don't want to push it too hard.
This SA crap is screwing hundreds of Linux miners.
The nofee option is absurd, Claymore probably works 24/7 on his code optimizations and this is the reason for devfee. Otherwise what's the point to burn his brain cells to update mining software really FAST.
I'm sure majority of Linux users don't really care about source. Let's face it - we are stuck with binary blobs like fglrx/amdgpu-pro anyway. Personally i'm on Linux because of stability and management ease, pssh rocks. Also i happen to disagree with Microsoft policies and attitude. We all know that Windows may be very easily "cured" from licensing issues, however what's the point of using such a product if there are legal alternatives.
I guess i'll start to rebuild miner images with kvm and GPU-passthrough support to avoid similar situations...
The nofee option is absurd, Claymore probably works 24/7 on his code optimizations and this is the reason for devfee. Otherwise what's the point to burn his brain cells to update mining software really FAST.
I'm sure majority of Linux users don't really care about source. Let's face it - we are stuck with binary blobs like fglrx/amdgpu-pro anyway. Personally i'm on Linux because of stability and management ease, pssh rocks. Also i happen to disagree with Microsoft policies and attitude. We all know that Windows may be very easily "cured" from licensing issues, however what's the point of using such a product if there are legal alternatives.
I guess i'll start to rebuild miner images with kvm and GPU-passthrough support to avoid similar situations...
Jump to: