Topic: [CLOSED] MaxBTC.com Pool - Closed Indefinitely Aug 3rd 2013 - page 13. (Read 27447 times)
ah sorry ye I see it fluctuate alot between 100-500GH, probably gpumax traffic?
Ever thought about paying out BTC for Namecoins like Eclipse? For the people that don't mine to keep them.
Good suggestion. It's on the list of things to do but I don't know how soon we'll get to it.
mmm the pool had 400+ GH for one day now its back to normal 100-150gh , dont see how you could add 450GH as the norm.
It's been at 400 Gh for a while, peaking at like 700. It appears there is a big hopper who goes in and out.
Right. Actually, the last number I had the title at was 250gh. I believe a mod bumped it up to 459gh, which is probably what they saw when they decided to update the sticky list.
mmm the pool had 400+ GH for one day now its back to normal 100-150gh , dont see how you could add 450GH as the norm.
It's been at 400 Gh for a while, peaking at like 700. It appears there is a big hopper who goes in and out.
mmm the pool had 400+ GH for one day now its back to normal 100-150gh , dont see how you could add 450GH as the norm.
Ever thought about paying out BTC for Namecoins like Eclipse? For the people that don't mine to keep them.
Wow the pools hashrate is higher then Eclipse's, that's amazing!
No problem, I really like the pool. Best one I have used yet.
Did something break? Workers showing 0 mhash, top miners now at 0 and #72 an invalid block. Was so glad to see the block get solved too.
Edit: Looks like Btcx is already on it.
Edit: Looks like Btcx is already on it.
Thanks for the report. We are tinkering around but the invalid was just a coincidence. Bummer after such a long round
Separate email notifications for Namecoin should be up shortly.
Did something break? Workers showing 0 mhash, top miners now at 0 and #72 an invalid block. Was so glad to see the block get solved too.
Edit: Looks like Btcx is already on it.
Edit: Looks like Btcx is already on it.
Logged in and saw my namecoins. UI is nice and clean and I was able to withdraw my nmc with no issues.
* Don't forget you need to set a nmc wallet address before you can withdraw
* Don't forget you need to set a nmc wallet address before you can withdraw
UPDATE: Merged Mining with NameCoin is now active.
Actually, it's been active for about 40 blocks.. we just got the UI done. If you've been mining, you should already have some NMC rewards!
Actually, it's been active for about 40 blocks.. we just got the UI done. If you've been mining, you should already have some NMC rewards!
very fancy. i've decided i like it!
ed: oh, I did notice that work #49 was confirmed some time ago but is still showing as unconfirmed on account total. not sure if that's something intentional or what
ed: oh, I did notice that work #49 was confirmed some time ago but is still showing as unconfirmed on account total. not sure if that's something intentional or what
thanks for pointing that out. we broke something in a recent update but it should be fine now. btw, merged mining with namecoin has been running for the past 2 days. we're just working out the UI for it now. the spoils should be available for you to see soon
very fancy. i've decided i like it!
ed: oh, I did notice that work #49 was confirmed some time ago but is still showing as unconfirmed on account total. not sure if that's something intentional or what
ed: oh, I did notice that work #49 was confirmed some time ago but is still showing as unconfirmed on account total. not sure if that's something intentional or what
It was round 41 block 172375, before you made the fix. Got so disappointed that I dropped out for a few rounds, happily not for good!
looks like you picked a good time to take a break.
well, i was present all of block #47 and was issued .54 bitcoins for 4911 shares, the person right above me received .61 for 1685.
i first started in block #46, reached 5,901 shares, and received .38 bitcoins. some fellow named NoodlesMcGee received .41 for for 5,499.. fair enough, since it seems like he's been around for a while. in block 47, he received .32 for 1039 shares, vs (as mentioned earlier) .54 for 4911. miners were running the whole time.
i shifted some off after seeing that, seems a bit extreme.
the only time I came out ahead on a pool with a similar system was after I stopped mining
i first started in block #46, reached 5,901 shares, and received .38 bitcoins. some fellow named NoodlesMcGee received .41 for for 5,499.. fair enough, since it seems like he's been around for a while. in block 47, he received .32 for 1039 shares, vs (as mentioned earlier) .54 for 4911. miners were running the whole time.
i shifted some off after seeing that, seems a bit extreme.
the only time I came out ahead on a pool with a similar system was after I stopped mining
With block #47, we don't know what that person above you contributed in prior rounds. You have to look at how many shares it takes to solve the block too. You will have some earnings that carry over to the next round as well, as you pointed out.
well, i was present all of block #47 and was issued .54 bitcoins for 4911 shares, the person right above me received .61 for 1685.
i first started in block #46, reached 5,901 shares, and received .38 bitcoins. some fellow named NoodlesMcGee received .41 for for 5,499.. fair enough, since it seems like he's been around for a while. in block 47, he received .32 for 1039 shares, vs (as mentioned earlier) .54 for 4911. miners were running the whole time.
i shifted some off after seeing that, seems a bit extreme.
the only time I came out ahead on a pool with a similar system was after I stopped mining
i first started in block #46, reached 5,901 shares, and received .38 bitcoins. some fellow named NoodlesMcGee received .41 for for 5,499.. fair enough, since it seems like he's been around for a while. in block 47, he received .32 for 1039 shares, vs (as mentioned earlier) .54 for 4911. miners were running the whole time.
i shifted some off after seeing that, seems a bit extreme.
the only time I came out ahead on a pool with a similar system was after I stopped mining
Which block was this on?
It was round 41 block 172375, before you made the fix. Got so disappointed that I dropped out for a few rounds, happily not for good!Quote
Another feature of DGM is cross-round leakage.
Yea what a strange system, still got to get my brains over it. You are probably correct in that DGM is not good for intermittent mining. However, I would be surprised if the peculiarities of DGM didn't leave room for more advanced and profitable strategies than the standard pool hopping, which of course would be (and will be) another topic. actually, c is way too low, giving a disproportionately large value to shares submitted near the end of the round.
That is truly fucked up. I received 0.00000025 BTC for my avg 222 MH /sec, whereas someone mining 10x less shares got 10,000x more reward that round. Even if you adjust the parameters I cannot see how it would be more profitable than deepbit for anyone who mines intermittently.Oh, btw the pool rewards graph is one day early. Unless it's March 26th somewhere already...?
Which block was this on? c being too low was fixed as of round 43, and the adjustment to the parameters was actually huge, despite the numbers looking small. Round 45 was extremely long.. 4.8m shares, though we did end up paying out 57 BTC for it. The further from the end you dropped out, the further reduced your rewards would be. Also, it may take a few rounds of mining most of the time for your score to stabilize. This is the nature of DGM. If you're just mining for 10 minutes at a time here and there, a DGM pool is probably not the best option for you but you'll have to try it out and see. Another feature of DGM is cross-round leakage. As an example, GigaVPS stopped mining hours before round 45 was over but still got 0.67 BTC at 329k shares, and he hasn't mined at all yet on round 46 but if the round ended now he'd receive 0.31 BTC for it.
I believe that the graph will show anything mined on the current day UTC as belonging to the following day.
actually, c is way too low, giving a disproportionately large value to shares submitted near the end of the round.
That is truly fucked up. I received 0.00000025 BTC for my avg 222 MHz /sec, whereas someone mining 10x less shares got 10,000x more reward that round. Even if you adjust the parameters I cannot see how it would be more profitable than deepbit for anyone who mines intermittently.Oh, btw the pool rewards graph is one day early. Unless it's March 26th somewhere already...?
Sounds like a tobic for organofcorti's upcomming edition of Neighbourhood Pool Watch!
actually, c is way too low, giving a disproportionately large value to shares submitted near the end of the round.
That is truly fucked up. I received 0.00000025 BTC for my avg 222 MH /sec, whereas someone mining 10x less shares got 10,000x more reward that round. Even if you adjust the parameters I cannot see how it would be more profitable than deepbit for anyone who mines intermittently.Oh, btw the pool rewards graph is one day early. Unless it's March 26th somewhere already...?
From my account:
Quote
Sunday, Mar 25, 2012
Hash Rate (MH/s): 931.8
Estimated BTC: 0.24803774
0.24748349 btc This Round
0.22521500 btc Last 24 hours
Hash Rate (MH/s): 931.8
Estimated BTC: 0.24803774
0.24748349 btc This Round
0.22521500 btc Last 24 hours
Jump to: