Pages:
Author

Topic: [Closed] Pure PPS Bonus - CoinSauce - Instant Payouts - 2 Step Sign Up - page 6. (Read 10197 times)

legendary
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
I'm getting an issue with your pool not providing enough work and the webpages seem slow to load, bandwidth issues?

I'm getting the message Pool 0 not providing work fast enough for my miner, which isn't very fast (5970@386MH/card/second) but my hashing rate on your website reflects the lack of work sometimes showing close to 800MH but sometimes showing closer to 650. Just wanted to let you know Smiley

Otherwise, great pool, awesome interface, awesome 105% and logging, and 20 decimal precision Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 467
Merit: 250
Pool down ?

Back online Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
I had that also im guessing they are stales even tho valid someone else turned it in befor you and got the credit.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
hey i am showing shares that it is saying is valid but the reward is 0    Huh what is up with that



Share #         Submitted:       Reward:    Valid:
1972967       4 minutes ago    0              Yes
1972963       4 minutes ago    0              Yes
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Your "Paying our X bitcoins per second" is incorrect.

For example, right now it reads:

13,271.44 Mh/s
Paying out 0.00000000009395808682 Bitcoins per second
0.00000000009395808682 * 60 seconds = 0.00000000563748/minute
0.00000000563748 * 60 minutes = 0.0000003382488/hour
0.0000003382488 * 24 hours = 0.0000081179712/day


I thought, "Hey maybe he just has too many zeros" so I took six off.

So 0.00009395808682/second
0.0000009395808682 * 60 seconds = 0.0056374852092/minute
0.00338249112552 * 60 minutes = 0.338249112552/hour
0.338249112552 * 24 hours = 8.117978701248/day


And at that MH/s you should make approx ~7.731BTC a day, and 7.731 * 1.05 = 8.11755BTC


Hell, instead of doing that math after I took six zeros off, you coulda just taken them off the original answer, or to be more mathematically correct, took it times 1 million.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Are we going to see a json api?
sr. member
Activity: 467
Merit: 250
Could you reduce the payout amount from 0.05 BTC to something like 0.01 BTC ? A few pools have it at 0.01 BTC (Deepbit, Mt.Red etc)

Can't do that at the moment, that would be too low and prone to abuse. I'll try to work something out with those who have low hash rates. Sorry to keep you waiting. Sad

Hmm.. How about limiting the number of payouts to like 4 a day or something ? anything above 0.01 BTC but only like 4 times a day and the rest is auto payout'd at like 23:59 Everyday ?
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Could you reduce the payout amount from 0.05 BTC to something like 0.01 BTC ? A few pools have it at 0.01 BTC (Deepbit, Mt.Red etc)

Can't do that at the moment, that would be too low and prone to abuse. I'll try to work something out with those who have low hash rates. Sorry to keep you waiting. Sad
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
Yea i found that but also i ment for the topic it might help would get more users to use your pool if they can see the pps rate befor signing up.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Where do we see the rate your paying for pps i cant seem to find it listed in this thread that would be helpful to get miners to come to you easyer.

Hmm, sorry for not having this displayed somewhere clearly. You can click any profile page (go to the stats page) and you'll see the share history. There you will see a payment column on the table where you can see how much we pay per share.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Power to the people!
Where do we see the rate your paying for pps i cant seem to find it listed in this thread that would be helpful to get miners to come to you easyer.
sr. member
Activity: 467
Merit: 250
Could you reduce the payout amount from 0.05 BTC to something like 0.01 BTC ? A few pools have it at 0.01 BTC (Deepbit, Mt.Red etc)
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Pool is down again. Embarrassed

Sorry for the downtime, an automated database migration went wrong. We added a new column for each share storing the hash value, however we did not log this value for old shares, which caused errors when users visited profile pages, crashing the workers.
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Block chain downloaded, you can now cash out.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Sorry for the short period of downtime, our server couldn't handle the load. Someone pointed 100 ghash. I'm upgrading the EC2 instance. Smiley
Can't you use autoscaling? If CPU usage goes over X% for Y minutes, fire up a new instance and add it to the load balancer.

Yes, but the database and pool server is on a single instance. I would have to move the database on it's own instance before allowing auto-scaling to maintain data consistency.

Working on it. Smiley
Wink Hey if you're going to go AWS, you might as well go the whole hog, right? Therefore, EC2 for compute and web frontend, RDS for relational database, DyanmoDB for NoSQL database, S3 for bulk storage of backups, (and an offline backup or 3 of course), CloudFront for website resources (.js, .css, image files, etc.), and of course CloudWatch for monitoring.

Wow, that would be expensive lol. Probably better not.

Haha, yes it would. AWS is great for scaling for services that have don't know their requirements yet, such as us! Once we settle down, I'll get a reserved instance so it doesn't cost as much.

We like to use software that doesn't lock us in. PostgreSQL is on it's own happy island and I don't see why we should go with the NoSQL fad with an Amazon lock-in. Roll Eyes

rjk
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
Sorry for the short period of downtime, our server couldn't handle the load. Someone pointed 100 ghash. I'm upgrading the EC2 instance. Smiley
Can't you use autoscaling? If CPU usage goes over X% for Y minutes, fire up a new instance and add it to the load balancer.

Yes, but the database and pool server is on a single instance. I would have to move the database on it's own instance before allowing auto-scaling to maintain data consistency.

Working on it. Smiley
Wink Hey if you're going to go AWS, you might as well go the whole hog, right? Therefore, EC2 for compute and web frontend, RDS for relational database, DyanmoDB for NoSQL database, S3 for bulk storage of backups, (and an offline backup or 3 of course), CloudFront for website resources (.js, .css, image files, etc.), and of course CloudWatch for monitoring.

Wow, that would be expensive lol. Probably better not.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Payout gives 500 error.

The blockchain is downloading. Theres around 20k to go.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Payout gives 500 error.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
pool keeps goin up n down...lol any ETA?

I've just finished migrating the servers. This amount of downtime shouldn't happen again in the future since it'll be easy to scale.

Server is up for pounding!
Pages:
Jump to: