Pages:
Author

Topic: [CLOSED] S.DICE - SatoshiDICE 100% Dividend-Paying Asset on MPEx - page 101. (Read 316488 times)

legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
All Casinos purchase specialty Casino Insurance, which is usually underwritten with cooperation from a bank using a letter of credit / credit line for the casino.

Who backstops SatoshiDICE's cash reserve? What happens if a series of lucky (or unlucky if you're a shareholder) rolls wipes out the cash reserve? With no backstop the betting limit would have to be lowered, and SatoshiDICE would enter a period of very slow growth. And it would be quite vulnerable to a well financed competitor with a larger cash reserve. Customers would leave SatoshiDICE if the limits stayed low for too long. Nowhere is this mentioned in the prospectus...


As mentioned, cash reserve can fall to zero, but can't go negative. In the extremely unlikely even that the statistical variance resulted in this (it's something less than 0.01% chance), it would mean I'd simply put more cash into it and then get it moving again. It's too profitable to just let it sit there.

Not mentioned in the prospectus because it seems obvious to me, but I probably should have discussed this.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
Where can we audit the BTC cash reserves?
This thread is a good place to start - people have been auditing SatoshiDICE since it started Smiley
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/satoshi-dice-statistical-analysis-80312

But where's the running balance? Nothing in the prospectus talks about the size of the cash reserve, or discusses the probability that SatoshiDICE will "go bust" (which is unlikely but still a nonzero chance).

If the dividends are paid out every month what happens to the cash reserves? How often are the betting limits reduced on account of liquidity? What's the long term plan for raising the betting limits?

A lot of unanswered questions here! I think people are getting caught up in the glamour and hype and are forgetting basic due dilligence!!!!


1) Running balance of the wallet is not public (though I could make it such). It's held in a handful of online (hot) wallets and offline cold storage. The balance is thus the sum of these accounts... as of this second, it stands at 7,302 BTC

2) SatoshiDICE cannot go bust. It's algorithms change the max bet sizes in real time so that in a world where the site lost every bet forever, the cash reserves just fall toward zero asymptotically.  It can lose all the money in cash reserves, but never go into debt.

3) Dividends paid out come from new profits, and don't reduce cash reserve below the level it was at in the prior month. Betting limits rise and fall constantly based on statistical variance. Betting limits are very high right now, and I do not intend to raise them further - though if I wished to, I can at any time put in more capital for this purpose.

4) Are there a lot of unanswered questions? I think I've been quite good about answering them all, no? And yes, due diligence is extremely important. I'm hoping people at least read the full prospectus before posting here, because lots of questions are likely answered in that document.

sr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
The site itself is simply a fancy front entrance.

True. However, the expectation of parabolic growth comes not from an increasing stream of gambling "tech nerds", but from the mainstream exposure generated through advertising.


Gah.... again, the site valuation is based on NOT assuming growth, but on current revenues/profits. If "parabolic growth" occurs, then great, but it's certainly not an assumption. The offering makes financial sense for an investor even with near zero growth.

How is growth not factored in to it? You have been shouting about it's growth potential for the first half of the thread.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Avg. daily revenues: 4,798.63
Avg. profit per day: 91.17 btc (this is profit, not revenue)
...
Projected profit per year: 33,278 (again, this is profit, not revenue, and assumes ZERO growth)

Where's the standard deviation and variance for daily / weekly revenues?

What's the confidence level for the projected profit?

Where are the Poisson regressions!!!!
sr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
Do not get my wrong, I hope you guys sell out, it would be nice to know people are willing to wait 15 years to break even. I just sadly do not think that is realistic right now. We will see.
Wait 15 years to break even... what are you talking about?  

If SatoshiDICE didn't grow at all (which it will) and you were never able to sell the share (which you can), then it would take about 10 years to break even.

Maybe he talks about actual profits (65 BTC daily), not some mysterious "expected" profits/earnings (4,798.63 BTC x 0.019). You know, E in that P/E ratio is called Earnings, not rEvenue (for a reason). You're happily calling your revenue as your ("expected") profits/earnings. Profits/earnings is normally something you get after deducting expenses which, btw., include advertising costs which "will be increased to between $500-$1,000 per month" (from "$100-$300 range") therefore weakening your E and making P/E ratio even higher.

So people, please stop using P/E 10 when speaking about this IPO, since the correct P/E ratio is 15 (345,000 / 65 x 365).

Since the site will grow, and since you can sell your share whenever, the equation changes substantially. A conservative estimate with a doubling of site revenue within 2-3 years means you'd have made 100% within 1-2 years because the stock price would double to maintain the same 10x p/e valuation. The attractiveness of such an investment to professional investors should be apparent.

No, it doesn't mean that. Again, you're speaking about revenues and totally forgetting (rising) expenses. Secondly, P/E ratio can and most likely will change over time, reflecting eg. changes in business environment and profitability of your venture or simply due to changes in stock/market price. P/E isn't some static figure you can shove down your "professional investors'" throats and make them follow it blindly, but a dynamic ratio which measures a variety of factors reflected either in stock/market price or earnings of your venture. Inability to both understand this business dynamic/logic behind P/E ratio and distinguish revenue from profits/earnings is alone sufficient reason for me not invest in this venture.

10 or 15.....Both P/Es are unattractive for this.
donator
Activity: 668
Merit: 500
LOL how does the deal suck? Cause it doesn't make 7000% per year? Man people have been spoiled Smiley

And, as mentioned, SatoshiDice volumes have GROWN while BTC appreciated against the dollar, meaning when the BTC was 2x as valuable as prior, the site had grown nominally in BTC, thus the actual growth of the site has been tremendous. Dividends are paid in BTC, so the extent to which BTC rallies against dollars is not as important as you're making it out to be.

Come on Erik: realistically speaking if BTC goes up 10 times, people are going to be willing to gamble less, let's be generous and say 25% as much in BTC space, or 2.5 times more in fiat space.   However I look at it I can only see downside to your BTC volume and profitability.

But good luck to you, it'll be interesting to see how much you can rope in and at what price.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
Do not get my wrong, I hope you guys sell out, it would be nice to know people are willing to wait 15 years to break even. I just sadly do not think that is realistic right now. We will see.
Wait 15 years to break even... what are you talking about? 

If SatoshiDICE didn't grow at all (which it will) and you were never able to sell the share (which you can), then it would take about 10 years to break even.

Maybe he talks about actual profits (65 BTC daily), not some mysterious "expected" profits/earnings (4,798.63 BTC x 0.019). You know, E in that P/E ratio is called Earnings, not rEvenue (for a reason). You're happily calling your revenue as your ("expected") profits/earnings. Profits/earnings is normally something you get after deducting expenses which, btw., include advertising costs which "will be increased to between $500-$1,000 per month" (from "$100-$300 range") therefore weakening your E and making P/E ratio even higher.

So people, please stop using P/E 10 when speaking about this IPO, since the correct P/E ratio is 15 (345,000 / 65 x 365).

Since the site will grow, and since you can sell your share whenever, the equation changes substantially. A conservative estimate with a doubling of site revenue within 2-3 years means you'd have made 100% within 1-2 years because the stock price would double to maintain the same 10x p/e valuation. The attractiveness of such an investment to professional investors should be apparent.

No, it doesn't mean that. Again, you're speaking about revenues and totally forgetting (rising) expenses. Secondly, P/E ratio can and most likely will change over time, reflecting eg. changes in business environment and profitability of your venture or simply due to changes in stock/market price. P/E isn't some static figure you can shove down your "professional investors'" throats and make them follow it blindly, but a dynamic ratio which measures a variety of factors reflected either in stock/market price or earnings of your venture. Inability to both understand this business dynamic/logic behind P/E ratio and distinguish revenue from profits/earnings is alone sufficient reason for me not invest in this venture.

Cedus, you're confusing yourself.

See figures here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aiec3-Eo_yO5dG5SQklHZG4wRm1GMW9DRWpMMW5UQkE#gid=0

Avg. daily revenues: 4,798.63
House edge: 0.019
Avg. profit per day: 91.17 btc (this is profit, not revenue)

Projected profit per year: 33,278 (again, this is profit, not revenue, and assumes ZERO growth)

IPO will raise capital at roughly 10x P/E ratio based on that above figure.



legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
All Casinos purchase specialty Casino Insurance, which is usually underwritten with cooperation from a bank using a letter of credit / credit line for the casino.

Who backstops SatoshiDICE's cash reserve? What happens if a series of lucky (or unlucky if you're a shareholder) rolls wipes out the cash reserve? With no backstop the betting limit would have to be lowered, and SatoshiDICE would enter a period of very slow growth. And it would be quite vulnerable to a well financed competitor with a larger cash reserve. Customers would leave SatoshiDICE if the limits stayed low for too long. Nowhere is this mentioned in the prospectus...
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Where can we audit the BTC cash reserves?
This thread is a good place to start - people have been auditing SatoshiDICE since it started Smiley
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/satoshi-dice-statistical-analysis-80312

But where's the running balance? Nothing in the prospectus talks about the size of the cash reserve, or discusses the probability that SatoshiDICE will "go bust" (which is unlikely but still a nonzero chance).

If the dividends are paid out every month what happens to the cash reserves? How often are the betting limits reduced on account of liquidity? What's the long term plan for raising the betting limits?

A lot of unanswered questions here! I think people are getting caught up in the glamour and hype and are forgetting basic due dilligence!!!!
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
Do not get my wrong, I hope you guys sell out, it would be nice to know people are willing to wait 15 years to break even. I just sadly do not think that is realistic right now. We will see.
Wait 15 years to break even... what are you talking about? 

If SatoshiDICE didn't grow at all (which it will) and you were never able to sell the share (which you can), then it would take about 10 years to break even.

Maybe he talks about actual profits (65 BTC daily), not some mysterious "expected" profits/earnings (4,798.63 BTC x 0.019). You know, E in that P/E ratio is called Earnings, not rEvenue (for a reason). You're happily calling your revenue as your ("expected") profits/earnings. Profits/earnings is normally something you get after deducting expenses which, btw., include advertising costs which "will be increased to between $500-$1,000 per month" (from "$100-$300 range") therefore weakening your E and making P/E ratio even higher.

So people, please stop using P/E 10 when speaking about this IPO, since the correct P/E ratio is 15 (345,000 / 65 x 365).

Since the site will grow, and since you can sell your share whenever, the equation changes substantially. A conservative estimate with a doubling of site revenue within 2-3 years means you'd have made 100% within 1-2 years because the stock price would double to maintain the same 10x p/e valuation. The attractiveness of such an investment to professional investors should be apparent.

No, it doesn't mean that. Again, you're speaking about revenues and totally forgetting (rising) expenses. Secondly, P/E ratio can and most likely will change over time, reflecting eg. changes in business environment and profitability of your venture or simply due to changes in stock/market price. P/E isn't some static figure you can shove down your "professional investors'" throats and make them follow it blindly, but a dynamic ratio which measures a variety of factors reflected either in stock/market price or earnings of your venture. Inability to both understand this business dynamic/logic behind P/E ratio and distinguish revenue from profits/earnings is alone sufficient reason for me not invest in this venture.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Gah.... again, the site valuation is based on NOT assuming growth, but on current revenues/profits. If "parabolic growth" occurs, then great, but it's certainly not an assumption. The offering makes financial sense for an investor even with near zero growth.

With no growth, the "investment" takes 10 years to pay off.

It may take 10 years for the investment to double your money from the dividend, but at any point you would be able to sell and recover your initial investment (assuming there is still a market and bitcoin still exists, etc). Since when does your money have to double to "pay off"?
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
SatoshiDICE pays for every transaction it makes. To date, it is the largest supporter of miners in the bitcoin economy. The majority of all mining fees ever have been paid by SatoshiDICE.

Where can we audit the BTC cash reserves?



This thread is a good place to start - people have been auditing SatoshiDICE since it started Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/satoshi-dice-statistical-analysis-80312
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
Gah.... again, the site valuation is based on NOT assuming growth, but on current revenues/profits. If "parabolic growth" occurs, then great, but it's certainly not an assumption. The offering makes financial sense for an investor even with near zero growth.

With no growth, the "investment" takes 10 years to pay off.


Again, please check your math. In 10 years, you would have doubled your money just from the dividends assuming zero growth. That's very different then "paying off" in 10 years.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
As far as I know Erik operates out of UAE, or some such.

I saw a U.S.A. phone number so assumed he was in the states. Wouldn't being located in an Islamic country be yet another investor risk?


He works for BitInstant in NYC and is a member of the Free State Project (New Hampshire).

I'm in Manhattan these days, though I was previously in New Hampshire, and before that was living in Dubai and may move there again in the future (since the US sucks).

For anyone in NYC by the way, we're having a big Meetup at our new office on Wednesday evening, lots of cool dudes will be here: http://www.meetup.com/Jekyll_Island_Bitcoin_Society/events/77229272/
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
SatoshiDICE pays for every transaction it makes. To date, it is the largest supporter of miners in the bitcoin economy. The majority of all mining fees ever have been paid by SatoshiDICE.

Where can we audit the BTC cash reserves?

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Gah.... again, the site valuation is based on NOT assuming growth, but on current revenues/profits. If "parabolic growth" occurs, then great, but it's certainly not an assumption. The offering makes financial sense for an investor even with near zero growth.

With no growth, the "investment" takes 10 years to pay off. I don't believe an unregulated gambling site that uses a digital currency which circumvents the entire establishment financial system will last 10 years without being fucked with.

True "due dilligence" would enumerate the risks. Why do I see no mention of risk in the prospectus? Domain seizure is very real and very likely (especially with .com).

Seizure of the owner of the operation is also equally likely.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
Gah.... again, the site valuation is based on NOT assuming growth, but on current revenues/profits. If "parabolic growth" occurs, then great, but it's certainly not an assumption. The offering makes financial sense for an investor even with near zero growth.

We disagree.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
Maybe I would invest into this but being on MPEX is risky as hell and I don't want to support spamming of the blockchain with huge amounts transactions either (my SSD drive has only 128 GB). Cool

SatoshiDICE pays for every transaction it makes. To date, it is the largest supporter of miners in the bitcoin economy. The majority of all mining fees ever have been paid by SatoshiDICE.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
The site itself is simply a fancy front entrance.

True. However, the expectation of parabolic growth comes not from an increasing stream of gambling "tech nerds", but from the mainstream exposure generated through advertising.


Gah.... again, the site valuation is based on NOT assuming growth, but on current revenues/profits. If "parabolic growth" occurs, then great, but it's certainly not an assumption. The offering makes financial sense for an investor even with near zero growth.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
As far as I know Erik operates out of UAE, or some such.

I saw a U.S.A. phone number so assumed he was in the states. Wouldn't being located in an Islamic country be yet another investor risk?


He works for BitInstant in NYC and is a member of the Free State Project (New Hampshire).
Pages:
Jump to: