Pages:
Author

Topic: CryptoKingdom Uncensored - page 36. (Read 69696 times)

legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 03, 2017, 07:32:28 PM
If you guys want an M exchange asset (and I can't wait to dish a huge dose of "I told you so") then the CKG Bounty is off the table.

Okay you stick-in-the-mud cunt Grin

Are you mad that I'm not helping you turn CK into a P&D, or that you can't figure out how to make a window (preferably) so you can jump out of it.

TBH, if you get your way, a CKG asset makes little to no sense, so why waste assets to create it? It's obvious that you are going to push the M asset every time I up the CKG bounty, so I'd rather just let it go than argue the obvious.
hero member
Activity: 763
Merit: 534
August 03, 2017, 07:24:38 PM
If you guys want an M exchange asset (and I can't wait to dish a huge dose of "I told you so") then the CKG Bounty is off the table.

Okay you stick-in-the-mud cunt Grin
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 03, 2017, 07:06:15 PM
If you guys want an M exchange asset (and I can't wait to dish a huge dose of "I told you so") then the CKG Bounty is off the table.

Nothing can happen before,

1. A vote of M holders gives a green light to change things
2. PJ says he is willing and able to make these changes

The advantage of your CKG option is it doesn't require either of the above, and maybe most M holders agree with you, but the worth of the IOU token depends 100% on the credibility of who issues it, and everyone knows E1 iOU was backed by risto and is worthless now despite his good rep when he created it, so too was b1 after he added unbacked tokens into the wild. Reputation can't beat a blockchain for player confidence.

I don't see a problem with your CKG bounty, so keep it, just be realistic about what good it will do. It's not a blockchain solution, and only good if the person who issues it has great reputation, and your bounty only requires reputable exchange, not reputable issuer of the IOU.

I have approx 800mil M, and without a depository I can't buy more M yet, so my voice is small, but I plan to buy M when I can.

When in doubt ask the game owners to decide things.

An M exchange asset is going to create deflation--I've said it enough times for those who are paying attention, and care, to understand the issue--I do not wish you good luck in you or loaf's agenda.
hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
August 03, 2017, 07:00:39 PM
If you guys want an M exchange asset (and I can't wait to dish a huge dose of "I told you so") then the CKG Bounty is off the table.

Nothing can happen before,

1. A vote of M holders gives a green light to change things
2. PJ says he is willing and able to make these changes

The advantage of your CKG option is it doesn't require either of the above, and maybe most M holders agree with you, but the worth of the IOU token depends 100% on the credibility of who issues it, and everyone knows E1 iOU was backed by risto and is worthless now despite his good rep when he created it, so too was b1 after he added unbacked tokens into the wild. Reputation can't beat a blockchain for player confidence.

I don't see a problem with your CKG bounty, so keep it, just be realistic about what good it will do. It's not a blockchain solution, and only good if the person who issues it has great reputation, and your bounty only requires reputable exchange, not reputable issuer of the IOU.

I have approx 800mil M, and without a depository I can't buy more M yet, so my voice is small, but I plan to buy M when I can.

When in doubt ask the game owners to decide things.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 03, 2017, 05:49:57 PM
If you guys want an M exchange asset (and I can't wait to dish a huge dose of "I told you so") then the CKG Bounty is off the table.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
August 03, 2017, 04:49:43 PM
This was deleted by rpietila. He does not want to admit that he now also owns an equivalent amount of Bitcoin Cash on his Bitcoin debts.

Pay your debts.

For Bitcoin denominated debts, an equivalent amount of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash is now owed.

It's the millionth time that reply was deleted.
3 times today  Cheesy
I just keep reposting it.
You can do it too with your reply Tongue

--
I love the blockchain idea
Simply making a token would basically allow us to enter most exchanges
Meanwhile I have contacted NovaExchange on adding CKG



And CoinsMarkets.com which is a pretty bad exchange, but it's a start



C-Cex no reply yet.
hero member
Activity: 763
Merit: 534
August 03, 2017, 12:08:13 PM
boomboom has the right idea. I say do an ERC-20 coin for now due to possible multi-blockchain trading and to also get exposure to ETH holders as potential new blood. Take M and rename to CK. Less confusing.

Depending on how many decimal places the ERC-20 coin has, we may be able to keep it at 4 trillion in-game and it only be 4k or so CK blockchain coins. (4,000,0.00,000,000). If we want a higher or lower in-game currency supply, the time to do it is before the token is released. Hell, maybe go to 100 trillion in-game which would only be 10k on the blockchain with decimals. 

Don't do something stupid and try to use CKG or CAN as the token base. You need clear and simple, and you use M/CK to buy shit in the game.

Yes, to the exchange idea, but don't rely on PJ to do anything as he's only 1.5% of a dev at the moment at best as he is slow as fuck since he's no longer being paid. He's barely working on CK, as can see by all his "activity" over the last when he was being paid. But, sorry, I shut up and not put up as I have enough sense to see web-based game with no dev is a failing proposition.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
August 03, 2017, 11:02:07 AM
This was deleted by rpietila. He does not want to admit that he now also owns an equivalent amount of Bitcoin Cash on his Bitcoin debts.

Pay your debts.

For Bitcoin denominated debts, an equivalent amount of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash is now owed.
hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
August 03, 2017, 08:14:59 AM
I agree with the idea of putting the Markka(M) currency on a blockchain,but before we vote we need to know exactly how this is going to work. Will we keep our M balances on CK or they will be erased and credit us instead with "Markka" assets on a ratio 1:1 or 1:2,etc..? And how the trading of in-game items will work after this transition?

When we get markka on a blockchain, there should be a depository working like that of XMR when it was the game currency.

So you can withdraw markka to your own wallet or other exchange and deposit back to the game. The problem I see here is the network security.

This could be solved using an ARDR child chain as proposed by boomboom. This way the child chain security is taken care of by the ARDR parent chain.


Yes, ARDR child chain has security from the main parent chain, and afaik the child chain is highly configurable,  and it's even possible to have zero fees, with the bundler fees (the fee for writing child chain hashes to the main ARDR chain) paid by the child chain admin (I.e CK Game itself), so trading on the blockchain would be slow but free.

IMO it's actually better to replicate the existing user experience for most crypto trading where people keep majority of their coins in private wallets,  and deposit to centralised exchanges for trading, and withdraw bulk of coins back to their own wallet when finished, so I think keeping the current centralized Agora exchange for faster Game items trading is optimal.

I suggest first stage of conversion (after the vote) would be create the child chain with all the 'new M' in a CK genesis account, then current players would create an account on the child chain, and then on existing CK they would send all their 'old M' to 'new' with comment that included their [child chain account], and then the equivalent amount of 'new M' would be sent to their Ardr child chain account from the CK genesis account.

Then PJ would just need to establish deposit/withdrawal functions between the child chain blockchain, and the existing Agora DB. That would be enough for stage 1, and it would allow many existing exchanges to list CK's currency, as many currently list NXT. Technically this would be pretty straight forward.

Stage 2 could then have child chain assets created for CK items, and then a similar swap procedure could be done so players converted Agora DB items into child chain assets, and then deposit/withdraw functions between the child chain and Agora get added, so players can deposit into Agora centralised exchange for fast trading when they desire.

People familiar with NXT will know trading is possible for NXT assets on the decentralised asset ezchange, but it's slow, so most NXT asset trading happens on centralised exchanges like poloniex and bittrex that have faster trade engines. If CK moved to Ardr it could replicate this user experience.

Edit, I think 3rd party exchanges like polo and bittrex would only be interested in listing M, and maybe high volume items like CAN and 100 CKG bars, not enough volume even if CK had 1000's of players. Speculators would buy M, and maybe CAN and CKG, so 99% of trading would still be on Agora, BUT, speculators could still take a position in CK buying M on big exchanges like poloniex and bittrex without having to register as a player.
hero member
Activity: 649
Merit: 500
August 03, 2017, 05:34:08 AM
I agree with the idea of putting the Markka(M) currency on a blockchain,but before we vote we need to know exactly how this is going to work. Will we keep our M balances on CK or they will be erased and credit us instead with "Markka" assets on a ratio 1:1 or 1:2,etc..? And how the trading of in-game items will work after this transition?

When we get markka on a blockchain, there should be a depository working like that of XMR when it was the game currency.

So you can withdraw markka to your own wallet or other exchange and deposit back to the game. The problem I see here is the network security.

This could be solved using an ARDR child chain as proposed by boomboom. This way the child chain security is taken care of by the ARDR parent chain.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1035
Not your Keys, Not your Bitcoins
August 03, 2017, 04:59:49 AM
I agree with the idea of putting the Markka(M) currency on a blockchain,but before we vote we need to know exactly how this is going to work. Will we keep our M balances on CK or they will be erased and credit us instead with "Markka" assets on a ratio 1:1 or 1:2,etc..? And how the trading of in-game items will work after this transition?
hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
August 03, 2017, 02:50:32 AM
Good discussion, but I agree with the comment that the community needs to agree to this, so a vote needs to happen before a major change like this could be implemented. Ardor would be a good option, but a major undertaking. Another intermediate option could be ERC-20 token for 'M' only. Either way, good discussion to continue, CK without some blockchain token to trade on exchanges is a real pita!

I've told HMC the exact same thing in bold. Waiting for "put up or shut up" from him in regard to your post. Sucks, but we barely had a game before and we have even less of a game now, so I'd say a token alone won't do anything. Anyway, I'm sure we'll get around to making a token when there are only 3 players left and we'll get around to actually making a game when there is 1 player left...



I can't see anyway to put a CK token on an exchange that doesn't require moving the whole supply of whatever token is chosen to some form of blockchain first. Sure, plenty of enterprising people have used blockchain assets to create individual IOU tokens, and some might be possible to list on an exchange, but that isn't really decentralised imo.

For example, plenty of people have used NXT to re-issue ICO tokens before the ICO tokens are actually distributed, so users with good reputation create a NXT asset which acts as an IOU for something like IOTA, or NEM back in the day, and then a secondary market can establish itself before the actual ICO token itself is launched. Shonky operations like yobit do that stuff all the time, BUT, they're not crypto tokens, they're IOU's, and only as good as the rep of the person who issues them.

To claim HMC's bounty I can create a NXT asset or ERC-20 token, and then offer to buy CKG from players, and then issue those players my token on whatever platform I use, and maybe if I paid Yobit I could get it listed on their exchange, BUT, that doesn't achieve much, not compared to the 'CKGame' itself putting the whole currency M on a blockchain, and then getting that listed on many exchanges.

A player backed IOU doesn't need to get approved by community in a vote, but it pretty useless, and isn't a crypto token backed by a blockchain. I say go the full monty, change the CK monetary system and put M on a blockchain, and get that listed on an exchange, backed by The CK Game. To do that probably needs a vote, coz it's a big change, but well worth the effort.

Boomboom (or guy who agrees with loaf a lot), feel free to create that bounty or do the leg work to get it done.


I will, the leg work is really just call for a vote of M holders.

I could offer a bounty, but without permission from the owners of the game it's not going to achieve anything.


I hereby call for a vote from M holders to consider option of putting M on a blockchain, do we have 10% of M owners willing to call for a General Meeting to discuss possible options, and a possible vote?
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 03, 2017, 02:39:49 AM
Good discussion, but I agree with the comment that the community needs to agree to this, so a vote needs to happen before a major change like this could be implemented. Ardor would be a good option, but a major undertaking. Another intermediate option could be ERC-20 token for 'M' only. Either way, good discussion to continue, CK without some blockchain token to trade on exchanges is a real pita!

I've told HMC the exact same thing in bold. Waiting for "put up or shut up" from him in regard to your post. Sucks, but we barely had a game before and we have even less of a game now, so I'd say a token alone won't do anything. Anyway, I'm sure we'll get around to making a token when there are only 3 players left and we'll get around to actually making a game when there is 1 player left...



I can't see anyway to put a CK token on an exchange that doesn't require moving the whole supply of whatever token is chosen to some form of blockchain first. Sure, plenty of enterprising people have used blockchain assets to create individual IOU tokens, and some might be possible to list on an exchange, but that isn't really decentralised imo.

For example, plenty of people have used NXT to re-issue ICO tokens before the ICO tokens are actually distributed, so users with good reputation create a NXT asset which acts as an IOU for something like IOTA, or NEM back in the day, and then a secondary market can establish itself before the actual ICO token itself is launched. Shonky operations like yobit do that stuff all the time, BUT, they're not crypto tokens, they're IOU's, and only as good as the rep of the person who issues them.

To claim HMC's bounty I can create a NXT asset or ERC-20 token, and then offer to buy CKG from players, and then issue those players my token on whatever platform I use, and maybe if I paid Yobit I could get it listed on their exchange, BUT, that doesn't achieve much, not compared to the 'CKGame' itself putting the whole currency M on a blockchain, and then getting that listed on many exchanges.

A player backed IOU doesn't need to get approved by community in a vote, but it pretty useless, and isn't a crypto token backed by a blockchain. I say go the full monty, change the CK monetary system and put M on a blockchain, and get that listed on an exchange, backed by The CK Game. To do that probably needs a vote, coz it's a big change, but well worth the effort.

Boomboom (or guy who agrees with loaf a lot), feel free to create that bounty or do the leg work to get it done.
hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
August 03, 2017, 02:32:53 AM
Good discussion, but I agree with the comment that the community needs to agree to this, so a vote needs to happen before a major change like this could be implemented. Ardor would be a good option, but a major undertaking. Another intermediate option could be ERC-20 token for 'M' only. Either way, good discussion to continue, CK without some blockchain token to trade on exchanges is a real pita!

I've told HMC the exact same thing in bold. Waiting for "put up or shut up" from him in regard to your post. Sucks, but we barely had a game before and we have even less of a game now, so I'd say a token alone won't do anything. Anyway, I'm sure we'll get around to making a token when there are only 3 players left and we'll get around to actually making a game when there is 1 player left...



I can't see anyway to put a CK token on an exchange that doesn't require moving the whole supply of whatever token is chosen to some form of blockchain first. Sure, plenty of enterprising people have used blockchain assets to create individual IOU tokens, and some might be possible to list on an exchange, but that isn't really decentralised imo.

For example, plenty of people have used NXT to re-issue ICO tokens before the ICO tokens are actually distributed, so users with good reputation create a NXT asset which acts as an IOU for something like IOTA, or NEM back in the day, and then a secondary market can establish itself before the actual ICO token itself is launched. Shonky operations like yobit do that stuff all the time, BUT, they're not crypto tokens, they're IOU's, and only as good as the rep of the person who issues them.

To claim HMC's bounty I can create a NXT asset or ERC-20 token, and then offer to buy CKG from players, and then issue those players my token on whatever platform I use, and maybe if I paid Yobit I could get it listed on their exchange, BUT, that doesn't achieve much, not compared to the 'CKGame' itself putting the whole currency M on a blockchain, and then getting that listed on many exchanges.

A player backed IOU doesn't need to get approved by community in a vote, but it pretty useless, and isn't a crypto token backed by a blockchain. I say go the full monty, change the CK monetary system and put M on a blockchain, and get that listed on an exchange, backed by The CK Game. To do that probably needs a vote, coz it's a big change, but well worth the effort.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 03, 2017, 02:31:46 AM
Can I ask you what do you mean by "on a reputable exchange"? I know poloniex and bittrex are between the most popular ones,but do you consider c-cex,cryptopia or yobit reputable? It shouldn't be a very hard thing to get listed on these last ones(just paying a fee)..

Yes, any of those listed would be fine.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 03, 2017, 02:28:07 AM
Good discussion, but I agree with the comment that the community needs to agree to this, so a vote needs to happen before a major change like this could be implemented. Ardor would be a good option, but a major undertaking. Another intermediate option could be ERC-20 token for 'M' only. Either way, good discussion to continue, CK without some blockchain token to trade on exchanges is a real pita!


I've told HMC the exact same thing in bold. Waiting for "put up or shut up" from him in regard to your post. Sucks, but we barely had a game before and we have even less of a game now, so I'd say a token alone won't do anything. Anyway, I'm sure we'll get around to making a token when there are only 3 players left and we'll get around to actually making a game when there is 1 player left...



You've done nothing--so the idea that you get to tell anyone what is best for the game is repugnant. As an example: this is mostly an economic game and you were a CEO of a Window company, but couldn't even figure out how to make a window--even after I came up with a way to build windows, you were still too lazy to do so. Why are you playing at all? Your only strategy has to buy everything (without even doing cost analysis) and hope that others build the game for you to profit.

Put up a bounty for what you want, develop it yourself or stfu.
hero member
Activity: 763
Merit: 534
August 03, 2017, 01:17:28 AM
Good discussion, but I agree with the comment that the community needs to agree to this, so a vote needs to happen before a major change like this could be implemented. Ardor would be a good option, but a major undertaking. Another intermediate option could be ERC-20 token for 'M' only. Either way, good discussion to continue, CK without some blockchain token to trade on exchanges is a real pita!

I've told HMC the exact same thing in bold. Waiting for "put up or shut up" from him in regard to your post. Sucks, but we barely had a game before and we have even less of a game now, so I'd say a token alone won't do anything. Anyway, I'm sure we'll get around to making a token when there are only 3 players left and we'll get around to actually making a game when there is 1 player left...

hero member
Activity: 1068
Merit: 523
August 02, 2017, 11:02:50 PM
An ARDOR 'child chain' would be perfect to put everything about CK on a blockchain, based on NXT tech which has been around since 2013 and fully tested and battle hardened.

Here's a summary written by ARDOR core dev 'riker'

You'd basically get your own version of NXT as a child chain, so your main token 'M', plus all your other itmes would become 'assets' with all the features of dividends and messaging etc.

You couldn't design a better system for your Game if you tried IMHO.

I agree, an ARDOR child chain for the backend blockchain, messaging, voting, asset creation, and dividends etc, with a CK web front end, and agora providing a faster trading engine similar to a regular exchange like poloniex would be a great solution. I suggested this once before but Risto didn't like it.

The problem isn't so much technical, but governance - Everyone would need to agree to move the whole DB to ARDOR, which given the current situation doesn't look likely.

If CK is going to put any assets on a blockchain the whole community needs to agree on the details, otherwise it's not going to work. The asset(s) need to have 100% of their supply made into tokens, otherwise it's not decentralised and backed by the whole of CK, so everyone needs to agree, and there would need to be an organised swap of current Agora assets for blockchain assets.

At this stage, I am game for anything that makes it where the "crypto" in the damn game title isn't such a fucking joke anymore...

afaik ARDOR will start with one 'child chain', IGNIS, and the ARDOR dev's are having an ICO to sell off 50% of the IGNIS chain's token, and for projects simply wanting to issue an asset they'll most likely just use the IGNIS child chain.

If CK acted quickly it could be the first project to start it's own child chain, and if that happened the support from ARDOR devs would be huge as they'd obviously want to have the first independent child chain project do well. The NXT community has always had a great rep anyway, very helpful.

If the CK community was interested in this idea it could just use some of Risto's M to pay dev costs and bounties etc , and could have the first 100% blockchain backed crypto game in the world.

Easiest path would be setup the child chain, then swap over M first while setting up player accounts/wallets on the child chain, then do swaps for the other items in Agora DB gradually. If some items were not suited to a blockchain, just keep them in Agora DB.

Good discussion, but I agree with the comment that the community needs to agree to this, so a vote needs to happen before a major change like this could be implemented. Ardor would be a good option, but a major undertaking. Another intermediate option could be ERC-20 token for 'M' only. Either way, good discussion to continue, CK without some blockchain token to trade on exchanges is a real pita!
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1035
Not your Keys, Not your Bitcoins
August 02, 2017, 04:32:48 PM
Can I ask you what do you mean by "on a reputable exchange"? I know poloniex and bittrex are between the most popular ones,but do you consider c-cex,cryptopia or yobit reputable? It shouldn't be a very hard thing to get listed on these last ones(just paying a fee)..
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
August 02, 2017, 09:04:31 AM



20,000 CKG Bounty

--20,000 CKG to create and manage a CKG asset and get that asset listed on a reputable exchange.

I add 6:E chapelry to HMC's bounty, it cost ~1100 XMR back in the day, get CKG listed on a reputable exchange and become a large land holder in the Game.

https://cryptokingdom.me/land/chapelry/6:E

Adding a Gold Unicorn to the Bounty.

Adding 100 Moneroj (XMR)  to the Bounty.
Pages:
Jump to: