Topic: CryptoNote technical discussion and Chess Challenge - page 60. (Read 96133 times)
I am voting c4.
Now we have a choice of playing c4 to continue the exact line from the world cup game or we could do something else, like move the queen back, which we will very likely have to do in a move or two anyway (no way to stop Nc6)
I vote c4 mostly because I'm curious to see what team BBR does with that, but I may change my vote if other good moves are proposed.
I vote c4 mostly because I'm curious to see what team BBR does with that, but I may change my vote if other good moves are proposed.
I will make the 3rd vote for c4. We will have to make a new move at some point because black ended up with a good position in the World Cup game. I have an idea about when we can do something different, but I don't want to disclose that yet.
Signing bitcoin transactions offline is really important to a lot of people.
Are there any CryptoNote coins that have made progress with this yet?
https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/issues/354
Are there any CryptoNote coins that have made progress with this yet?
https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/issues/354
Now we have a choice of playing c4 to continue the exact line from the world cup game or we could do something else, like move the queen back, which we will very likely have to do in a move or two anyway (no way to stop Nc6)
I vote c4 mostly because I'm curious to see what team BBR does with that, but I may change my vote if other good moves are proposed.
I vote c4 mostly because I'm curious to see what team BBR does with that, but I may change my vote if other good moves are proposed.
I like c4
Now we have a choice of playing c4 to continue the exact line from the world cup game or we could do something else, like move the queen back, which we will very likely have to do in a move or two anyway (no way to stop Nc6)
I vote c4 mostly because I'm curious to see what team BBR does with that, but I may change my vote if other good moves are proposed.
I vote c4 mostly because I'm curious to see what team BBR does with that, but I may change my vote if other good moves are proposed.
Current position
Based on the votes in this thread Team Boolberry has chosen to play a6. Now it is time for Team Monero to respond. Since I was late posting the updated position, Team Monero may have another day (until 0:00 UTC on 10/7/15) to respond if needed.
Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)
white to move
1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 d6
3.d4 cxd4
4.Qxd4 a6
In the future if I am absent for long, anyone else should feel free to post a picture of the updated board after counting votes if they wish. My goal is to do so around 0:00 UTC daily, but today proves I may not always be on time.
Based on the votes in this thread Team Boolberry has chosen to play a6. Now it is time for Team Monero to respond. Since I was late posting the updated position, Team Monero may have another day (until 0:00 UTC on 10/7/15) to respond if needed.
Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)
white to move
1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 d6
3.d4 cxd4
4.Qxd4 a6
In the future if I am absent for long, anyone else should feel free to post a picture of the updated board after counting votes if they wish. My goal is to do so around 0:00 UTC daily, but today proves I may not always be on time.
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
OP has been updated with your good suggestion.
Current vote count is 2-1 in favor of a6 over Nc6. Votes will be counted at 0:00 UTC
a6
Nc6
I like your idea to avoid making any rule changes retroactive. Should we set a time now for the last bit of a future hash to decide things?
Are we all agreed now that future ties will use ArticMine's proposed tie-breaker rule?
Okay with me! Boolberry should update OP to make note of it.
I like your idea to avoid making any rule changes retroactive. Should we set a time now for the last bit of a future hash to decide things?
Are we all agreed now that future ties will use ArticMine's proposed tie-breaker rule?
I vote that we play a6. Team Monero will have to move their queen again after we attack it with Nc6 because Bb5 pinning our knight will no longer be possible.
If team Monero can play like Svidler we can play like Karjakin who just happened to win with black in this opening!
If team Monero can play like Svidler we can play like Karjakin who just happened to win with black in this opening!
I vote 4.Qxd4 in the spirit of the World Cup
i also vote Qxd4 to end this stall and following World Cup sounds good to me
Team Monero (white pieces) vs. Team Boolberry (black pieces)
black to move
1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 d6
3.d4 cxd4
4.Qxd4
Based on the votes in this thread Team Monero has chosen to play Qxd4 (4 votes) beating Nxd4 (3 votes) in close decision
Now it is time for Team Boolberry to respond. Votes will be counted at 0:00 UTC tomorrow.
I vote 4.Qxd4 in the spirit of the World Cup
i also vote Qxd4 to end this stall and following World Cup sounds good to me
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
We are now a few hours past UTC and the vote is still tied. If everyone could agree on a proposal like this we can proceed. Or another voter can break the tie.
Anyone can calculate the result the above proposal would lead to for this move. Please try to decide on whether the tiebreak proposal by ArticMine is appropriate or not without taking into account the 4th move it would lead to in this game.
I think in this particular instance since the situation of the tie occurred before a rule was proposed, a more fair method to resolve this tie is with a randomizer (for example last bit of a future Bitcoin block hash). Adopting the proposed rule going forward would be fine though.
I like your idea to avoid making any rule changes retroactive. Should we set a time now for the last bit of a future hash to decide things?
Or should we just wait a little longer? I can't remember any ties delaying things for long in the other bitcointalk chess thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lets-play-a-game-of-chess-1148538
How about making the move Qxd4 if the last number in the first bitcoin hash after 12:00 UTC is even and Nxd4 if the last number in the first bitcoin hash after 12:00 UTC is odd? Any vote before 12:00 UTC would still break the tie. Is that fair?
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
We are now a few hours past UTC and the vote is still tied. If everyone could agree on a proposal like this we can proceed. Or another voter can break the tie.
Anyone can calculate the result the above proposal would lead to for this move. Please try to decide on whether the tiebreak proposal one ArticMine is appropriate or not without taking into account the 4th move it would lead to in this game.
I think in this particular instance since the situation of the tie occurred before a rule was proposed, a more fair method to resolve this tie is with a randomizer (for example last bit of a future Bitcoin block hash). Adopting the proposed rule going forward would be fine though.
Yes. This makes sense to me.
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
We are now a few hours past UTC and the vote is still tied. If everyone could agree on a proposal like this we can proceed. Or another voter can break the tie.
Anyone can calculate the result the above proposal would lead to for this move. Please try to decide on whether the tiebreak proposal one ArticMine is appropriate or not without taking into account the 4th move it would lead to in this game.
I think in this particular instance since the situation of the tie occurred before a rule was proposed, a more fair method to resolve this tie is with a randomizer (for example last bit of a future Bitcoin block hash). Adopting the proposed rule going forward would be fine though.
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
We are now a few hours past UTC and the vote is still tied. If everyone could agree on a proposal like this we can proceed. Or another voter can break the tie.
Anyone can calculate the result the above proposal would lead to for this move. Please try to decide on whether the tiebreak proposal by ArticMine is appropriate or not without taking into account the 4th move it would lead to in this game.
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
That sounds like a fair idea to me. Hopefully it will not come to that and the vote count changes in the next few hours.
We need a tie breaking mechanism. For example one can look at the result before the vote that led to the tie and use that instead.
Jump to: