So what are you proposing? That we just continue to allow low difficulty networks to be exploited by people with large amounts of hash to throw around. To let them slowly make us not liquid in a bunch of alts and bleed BTC from unsuspecting users? And I suppose we should also have to cover this all ourselves rather than address the problem at hand?
Or, we could start delisting these coins that have demonstrated that they are unable to sufficiently secure their networks so that we can prevent ourselves and our users from losing coins.
If you don't understand the reasoning behind the action we're taking then you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Or, we could start delisting these coins that have demonstrated that they are unable to sufficiently secure their networks so that we can prevent ourselves and our users from losing coins.
If you don't understand the reasoning behind the action we're taking then you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Behave yourself!
You claimed without any evidence or understanding that we're abusing confirmations to manipulate markets and give ourselves some kind of trading advantage. You fucking behave yourself.
I am glad to see that you follow your exchange in reality and it took you one day to reply. Just like the deposit method you made.
Very nice attitude for exchange developer who wants to attract people.
If I knew your manners from the beginning, I would have never deposited a single coin in there.
Have a great day and enjoy your life to the maximum.
I won't bother replying to you again. From now on you are on my ignore list.
