I was hardly playing the "moral society card"--I was playing the "and you think you have room to talk" card, but maybe I misconstrued your criticism of The Powers That Be_need_war, and if that is the case, I'm sorry for taking you out of context and the harsh response.
As for the scam accusations, depending on the TPTB to investigate and come to the right conclusion (if they investigate at all) turns a blind eye to the corruption, incompetence, unevenness these originations have displayed over the years, decades, and centuries--this is the main reason we are trying to create decentralized technologies that are antifragile enough that they can't interfere with information socities that want to govern themselves. My main criticism isn't the instamine of dash, it's that its enablers parrot Satoshi's name and decentralization and other cryptoanarchist's views while managing to creep more and more centralization into their model. That's a huge problem for me, and if you knew TPTB_need_war from his economic threads, you'd realize I'm the softer, gentler (less idealistic) side of the movement, so it's an even bigger problem for him. He's a pit bull and anyone who cares about decentralizing society from the grasping hands of the sociopaths who currently run the world is glad to have him here and fighting the good fight. I'm sorry my political views force me to be critical of your investment, but I'm hardly changing them because they inconvenience you or any other investor.
I was not referring to you but to TPTB with the "guess who did" question. And I just had a Heureka moment, now that you use TPTB in context...and I just realized I kept googling for TBTP, because all I could find was nonsensical stuff like
http://www.acronymfinder.com/TBTP.html I agree with your comments about investigation in general, although not in full, because it is not like no authority ever investigates anything and people like TPTB portray a lot of crypto projects as such obvious and harmful crimes - comparing them to murder and rape and Evan to Karpeles and Co. - it would be possible to get them prosecuted if what he says was actually true (see Karpeles). I just know TPTB from projects I happen to be interested and yes, invested in (which he keeps interpreting to my disadvantage, insinuating I was only defending the Devs in questions for money motives).
I have a high sense of fairness and justice and I simply hate it when people are slandered. I think I only lost my temper ONCE and alluded to the Monero-Scam accusations in one of the inumerable threads where "you guys" keep harping about the "instamine". It was my "and you think you have room to talk"-card moment, but I am actually sorry about, because I don`t know enough about it and I highly value the "in dubio pro reo" principle. Me sense is that you guys don`t.
After what you just wrote, I`d actually expect you to reign in on your comrades, because imho you should agree that "scam" is far too harsh and simply unfair. "Expect" in the sense I`d be somewhat surprised if you did not, because what you point out is a matter of taste and nothing criminal. I really dislike Ripple for instance, but I don`t call it a "scam" (and yes, I know that word is being thrown around very lightly on this Forum, but "you guys" are actually dead serious about it).
So to be clear: I have no problem whatsoever if you call DASH and instamined centralized shitcoin with inferior technology, if that happens to be your opinion (repeating it in every DASH or non DASH thread is annoying, but I can ignore that). But to depict Evan Duffield as a criminal, is simply too much in my book and I read the accusations for 2 years now and I still did not see any actual proof of him knowingly doing anything wrong in the criminal sense. Same goes for Dor Konforty from Synereo or Come-from-Beyond from IOTA.
So ceterum censeo: go to the police if it is that bad or shut up (in general, not addressing you now).