DefaultTrust changes - page 111. | Bitcointalksearch.org

taikuri13

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1694

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 15, 2019, 12:19:54 PM

...
If you've been helping xtraelv with investigations and plan on leaving negative trusts, that's fine with me. I've removed you from my suggested exclusions list after xtraelv stated it.
It's just a bit unusual for someone to not leave a single trust rating, and all of a sudden leave 16 on the day they were added to DT2.

You might be confusing trust list with trust feedback too. You don't have to leave someone trust feedback if you want to add them to your trust list.

Yeah, I was able to figure it out.
And I understood my mistake.

I deleted 10 feedbacks.
Now I understand that every feedback from DT2 participants is a big responsibility.

ps: I have helped and will continue to help xtraelv regardless of whether I am at DT2 or not.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: xtraelv on January 14, 2019, 08:33:11 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 14, 2019, 06:46:02 PM

...
taikuri13 - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/taikuri13-1855828 | some random who sent 16 positive trusts today, with no previous feedbacks left
...

DarkStar_
we know each other a little bit, I translated your thread into Russian.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5047016 (Original topic: Overview of Bitcoin Accepting Sportsbooks (with margin/house edge comparisons))

I've never left a review on this forum.
If I did something wrong, tell me.

My feedback to people I have known for more than six months.
Yes, they write in Russian.

My list includes a moderator, experts who help forum participants, people who investigate fraud.

If you've been helping xtraelv with investigations and plan on leaving negative trusts, that's fine with me. I've removed you from my suggested exclusions list after xtraelv stated it.
It's just a bit unusual for someone to not leave a single trust rating, and all of a sudden leave 16 on the day they were added to DT2.

You might be confusing trust list with trust feedback too. You don't have to leave someone trust feedback if you want to add them to your trust list.

Alex_Sr

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 962

HOLD BITCOIN! Fiat - SCAM!

Quote from: marlboroza on January 15, 2019, 10:06:03 AM

Quote from: Alex_Sr on January 14, 2019, 01:36:06 PM

~

Please add reference links to all your negative ratings.

Thank you for correcting me! I'm not experienced yet, but I'm learning fast!

Done! All negative ratings now with links!

Slow death

legendary

Activity: 3262

Merit: 1130

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: marlboroza on January 15, 2019, 10:06:03 AM

Quote from: Slow death on January 14, 2019, 06:09:18 PM

~

Report correct post(you will figure which one) to moderator. Write this in comment: "Selling Serbian documents is illegal".

Done, the guy sells everything, maybe one day he will sell his own family

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2273

Quote from: Alex_Sr on January 14, 2019, 01:36:06 PM

~

Please add reference links to all your negative ratings.

Quote from: Slow death on January 14, 2019, 06:09:18 PM

~

Report correct post(you will figure which one) to moderator. Write this in comment: "Selling Serbian documents is illegal".

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 15, 2019, 01:53:25 AM

~

No one here should take advice from account farmer, bounty abuser and deep onion shill.

Slow death

legendary

Activity: 3262

Merit: 1130

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: asche on January 15, 2019, 06:58:23 AM

Quote from: theymos on January 09, 2019, 03:52:19 PM

Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.

All I see is the confirmation Lauda is a she.

asche

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1491

I forgot more than you will ever know.

Quote from: theymos on January 09, 2019, 03:52:19 PM

Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.

All I see is the confirmation Lauda is a she.

S_Therapist

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 280

Quote from: ?? on ??

ps: Perhaps a thread with recommendations will be useful to many users

The trust system is here for almost 5 years, afaik and you are here for 1 year almost.
Everything can be found here if you use search option and will get a better result if you use google for searching.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: ?? on ??

BitcoinTalk Rules = are you and your words only?

Yes, theymos is my master and I created a cult. Grin

Quote from: kzv on January 15, 2019, 05:16:46 AM

Hi

my question: may need to prohibit the registration of names like this https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/defaulttrust-2526482

~~Already DefaultTrust (22).~~ Nevermind, this doesn't work (tested by creating my own account prefixed; sorry theymos you will have to kill them). I agree that he should prohibit '~' + existing username (PM sent).

kzv

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1287

OpenTrade - Open Source Cryptocurrency Exchange

Hi

my question: may need to prohibit the registration of names like this https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/defaulttrust-2526482

eddie13

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 2271

BTC or BUST

Well...
Cryptopia was just hacked and many major crypto news publications are running stories including suspicions of an inside job..

Their main reps here are now on DT1 so I guess we will see how that goes..

I suggest they do not use their DT powers in any relation to this event, to tag "fudders" or whatever, and we should watch to make sure noone is intimidated about speaking about the situation..

I'm not suggesting they be excluded but I can just imagine what it would have been like if the cryptsy crew were on DT when that went down..

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Lauda on January 15, 2019, 04:34:59 AM

...
I can not. There are no rules. There are some guidelines but they are vague. Most of this stuff comes from implicit/explicit consensus on how you should handle yourself as a DT member. Were you ready to become one, you would have known this by now.

Maybe there's a proof-link on the blurry recommendations?
You are saying that I was wrong.
I want to know what my mistake is to prevent it in the future.

Either you don't understand English or you're wasting my time. I listed your mistakes:

Quote from: Lauda on January 15, 2019, 04:25:00 AM

What's wrong:
1) Not a single feedback has a reference.
2) Giving feedback for people you have "known for more than six months".
3) Giving feedback solely because you think someone is an "expert" or solely because they are a moderator.

There's no proof-link; don't be a nuisance.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Lauda on January 15, 2019, 04:25:00 AM

...
What's wrong:
1) Not a single feedback has a reference.
2) Giving feedback for people you have "known for more than six months".
3) Giving feedback solely because you think someone is an "expert" or solely because they are a moderator.

Can you provide a proof-link about these words?
Where can I read the rules for feedback?

I can not. There are no rules. There are some guidelines but they are vague. Most of this stuff comes from implicit/explicit consensus on how you should handle yourself as a DT member. Were you ready to become one, you would have known this by now.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote

FYI, you are already excluded several times so it doesn't matter anymore (taikuri13 (-3)).

I'm not surprised

You are not DT material anyways; don't take it personally. One inclusion nowadays means nothing.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: xtraelv on January 14, 2019, 08:33:11 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 14, 2019, 06:46:02 PM

...
taikuri13 - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/taikuri13-1855828 | some random who sent 16 positive trusts today, with no previous feedbacks left
...

DarkStar_
we know each other a little bit, I translated your thread into Russian.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5047016 (Original topic: Overview of Bitcoin Accepting Sportsbooks (with margin/house edge comparisons))

I've never left a review on this forum.
If I did something wrong, tell me.

My feedback to people I have known for more than six months.
Yes, they write in Russian.

My list includes a moderator, experts who help forum participants, people who investigate fraud.

What's wrong:
1) Not a single feedback has a reference.
2) Giving feedback for people you have "known for more than six months".
3) Giving feedback solely because you think someone is an "expert" or solely because they are a moderator.

FYI, you are already excluded several times so it doesn't matter anymore (taikuri13 (-3)).

S_Therapist

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 280

Quote from: The Cryptovator on January 15, 2019, 12:11:39 AM

It's ok to exclude them also. I can't ask everyone, but since ICOEthics on my custom list, I think there is nothing wrong to ask him.

I didn't mean in that way.
You have included ICOEthics because his feedback is trustworthy to you. Assume, ICOEthics included user 'A' whom you don't trust with his feedback. ICOEthics may trust and that's why he has included. Since you don't trust user "A", simply put him ~A in your trust list. That's it. All the purpose will be fulfilled.
1. You want to see ICOEthics feedback.
2. You don't want to see user 'A' feedback.
3. ICOEthic wants to see user 'A' feedback.

I think that's how DT works.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on January 14, 2019, 08:55:36 PM

I can agree with everyone on this list except raymond541. He is my assistant(not a random bounty manager) whom has worked with me on campaigns for well over 2 years now. I trust his judgement personally but If the community disagrees I would probably be willing to remove him from my list. I will not agree to exclude him though as I have stated before I trust his judgement to this point.

That does not make him DT2 material. Given that he barely uses the system, it would be better to not have him there unless something changes IMO.

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 15, 2019, 12:39:40 AM

Can not but-
The recent changes encourage people to use custom trust list. Why should we ask people to remove someone from their trust list? Isn't it better to exclude those whom you don't trust with their feedback? Problem solved.

Simple, I don't want to have a list with 100+ exclusions (which might be necessary unless those people are removed (among others)). Undecided

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 14, 2019, 06:46:02 PM

here's a list you can copy.

thanks dude - saved me time there.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 15, 2019, 12:39:40 AM

Can not but-
The recent changes encourage people to use custom trust list. Why should we ask people to remove someone from their trust list? Isn't it better to exclude those whom you don't trust with their feedback? Problem solved.

But the purpose of default trust system is to identify the scammers and untrustworthy people by the newbie,so if we have flaw in the system we are redirecting the newbie to trust the wrong person just because how the system works.

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 2228

Signature space for rent

Quote from: LoyceMobile on January 15, 2019, 01:04:03 AM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on January 15, 2019, 12:11:39 AM

You are in my list because I trust you with my fund.

That's not why you should add someone to your trust list: if you trust someone with funds, leave him feedback.
If you trust his judgement (on others), add him to your trust list.

You are right. Not at all I have added for this reason. I just gave him example. Obviously I trust his judgment same like I add you for your judgment and those others on my trust list.

LoyceMobile

hero member

Activity: 1659

Merit: 687

LoyceV on the road. Or couch.

Quote from: The Cryptovator on January 15, 2019, 12:11:39 AM

You are in my list because I trust you with my fund.

That's not why you should add someone to your trust list: if you trust someone with funds, leave him feedback.
If you trust his judgement (on others), add him to your trust list.

Topic: DefaultTrust changes - page 111. (Read 86349 times)