Seriously? You expect the US government to step in and defend a scheme tailor made to avoid taxation and regulation? One a congressman has already spoken against as promoting illegal drug use? In the interest of someone who is not a taxpayer or citizen?
That'd be like expecting the RIAA to ride to the defense of the original Napster.
I don't know the details of the EC2 use, do you? I certainly wouldn't risk using work assets to play with internet funbux, but hey.
Topic: delete - page 17. (Read 23927 times)
The courts of the country where bitcoinexpress lives, in the USA, maybe?
They sure like to use guys like him and make them examples out of them.
It's not like he's hiding all the persecution he's been making to all the alt currencies, even to the ones with no arrogant lead developers. The fact is that he's enjoying on disrupting computer systems that are not his to disrupt and he openly admits it.
Oh, and the fact that he's using Amazon EC2 for his criminal enterprise and saying it here: LOL to that.
And probably the person from whom he's stealing all those instances resources will not be happy also. ...the crimes start to add up... not gonna be pretty when it all comes down on him. Ofcourse all of you who are here defending him couldn't care less. It's not your ass after all... lol
They sure like to use guys like him and make them examples out of them.
It's not like he's hiding all the persecution he's been making to all the alt currencies, even to the ones with no arrogant lead developers. The fact is that he's enjoying on disrupting computer systems that are not his to disrupt and he openly admits it.
Oh, and the fact that he's using Amazon EC2 for his criminal enterprise and saying it here: LOL to that.
And probably the person from whom he's stealing all those instances resources will not be happy also. ...the crimes start to add up... not gonna be pretty when it all comes down on him. Ofcourse all of you who are here defending him couldn't care less. It's not your ass after all... lol
Oh Whatever.
I doubt the DOJ really cares about how PoopCoin 2.0 couldn't survive 10 minutes without failing.
Did typing out that fantasy make your penis hard? Just wondering.
My prediction: Absolutely nothing happens. Nobody comes down on nobody. Coinhunter makes up some excuse and in 2 week launches PoopCoin 3.0 with some equally ill planned security measure.
i can't stop laughing
Can't download the client from solidcoin.info or I'd fire it up in a VM to witness the miracle of decreasing block generation times as difficulty increases. That's a pleasant anti-pyramid twist...
Because CH has pulled the clients.
Clients are still posted chief. http://solidcointalk.org/topic/261-solidcoin-v20-released/
2 blocks per second.....
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
Diff will solve this... Have you ever watched a new blockchain starting with low diff?
Genius,
If you haven't noticed, as the diff is rising and so is the block generation LOL...
Who's got jurisdiction over this? Australian courts? United Nations? Al Gore? Court of public opinion?
The courts of the country where bitcoinexpress lives, in the USA, maybe?
They sure like to use guys like him and make them examples out of them.
It's not like he's hiding all the persecution he's been making to all the alt currencies, even to the ones with no arrogant lead developers. The fact is that he's enjoying on disrupting computer systems that are not his to disrupt and he openly admits it.
Oh, and the fact that he's using Amazon EC2 for his criminal enterprise and saying it here: LOL to that.
And probably the person from whom he's stealing all those instances resources will not be happy also. ...the crimes start to add up... not gonna be pretty when it all comes down on him. Ofcourse all of you who are here defending him couldn't care less. It's not your ass after all... lol
Can't download the client from solidcoin.info or I'd fire it up in a VM to witness the miracle of decreasing block generation times as difficulty increases. That's a pleasant anti-pyramid twist...
Well, trading in pennies... Solidcoin 2.0 RIP?!
Idiots will be idiots. No surprise here. Move on.
I don't have any way to look at the diff/block generation, any screencaps?
This is hilarious 
Indeed. A combination of schadenfreude and BX's excessive joviality is making my tummy jiggle with laughter.
Love it! LOL
This is hilarious
2 blocks per second.....
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
Diff will solve this... Have you ever watched a new blockchain starting with low diff?
And then BE pulls his cluster off, leaving patsies to mine .01 coins per week for the next six years. See: namecoin. Oh, except now with the threat of him taking the biggest dump since the invention of Ex-Lax on people's bids at any moment.
Yeah, I can see that driving adoption pretty hard.
Also of note, 3 wannabe hackers from this forum claimed they would take down the SolidCoin 2 public beta and none have. Welcome to the future of cryptocurrencies, a truly secure network.
Regardless of what you think about BCX, him exposing flaws in what's been said to be a 'truly secure network' is a service to all who may use said network. As it's already been demonstrated that CH, erm.... 'doesn't work well with others', I don't see how anything other than a live attack could have communicated said vulnerabilities.
Agree! BTX is doing a huge favor for us! If it is unsafe, this needs to be done.
Just got my popcorn!! LOL
2 blocks per second.....
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
Diff will solve this... Have you ever watched a new blockchain starting with low diff?
2 blocks per second.....
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.
Kind of hard to break anti-hacking laws when you have been publicly invited by the author of the code to as he stated "do your best it is unbreakable" you may want to do some fact checking before spouting off and making a fool of yourself.
You may want to take some classes on how judicial systems work before spouting off and making a fool of yourself. And before you throw in jail someone who thinks what you're saying will hold up on court.Who's got jurisdiction over this? Australian courts? United Nations? Al Gore? Court of public opinion?
I don't get the hate on BitcoinExpress. The reality is that the world has people w/ ill intent. Hackers expose flaws in systems. BE is exposing a flaw in SC 2.0. Better now then if/when it has millions of dollars of transaction volume and someone else double spends a quarter million and then kills the network.
I mean it you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen. This isn't a game of checkers it is a potential alternative to currency as we know it. If you think BE is the limit of what will eventually be thrown against a network well WAKE UP. The real world has mean, greedy, untrustworthly people. If there is a flaw they will find it.
Granted BE is somewhat of a douche personally (I think he takes just a little to much satisfaction in his work) but he does crypto-currency a good service.
I mean it you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen. This isn't a game of checkers it is a potential alternative to currency as we know it. If you think BE is the limit of what will eventually be thrown against a network well WAKE UP. The real world has mean, greedy, untrustworthly people. If there is a flaw they will find it.
Granted BE is somewhat of a douche personally (I think he takes just a little to much satisfaction in his work) but he does crypto-currency a good service.
Kind of hard to break anti-hacking laws when you have been publicly invited by the author of the code to as he stated "do your best it is unbreakable" you may want to do some fact checking before spouting off and making a fool of yourself.
You may want to take some classes on how judicial systems work before spouting off and making a fool of yourself. And before you throw in jail someone who thinks what you're saying will hold up on court. Jump to: