Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .
Topic: deleted - page 8. (Read 8071 times)
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Large numbers of users appreciated this project and invite all new participants here, this is a good indicator!
Where do you get the statistics that you are referring to right now? This is interesting information. I want to know more about this.Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins . Large numbers of users appreciated this project and invite all new participants here, this is a good indicator!
Where do you get the statistics that you are referring to right now? This is interesting information. I want to know more about this.
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
Large numbers of users appreciated this project and invite all new participants here, this is a good indicator!
Where do you get the statistics that you are referring to right now? This is interesting information. I want to know more about this.
.
Large numbers of users appreciated this project and invite all new participants here, this is a good indicator!
Where do you get the statistics that you are referring to right now? This is interesting information. I want to know more about this.Large numbers of users appreciated this project and invite all new participants here, this is a good indicator!
Where do you get the statistics that you are referring to right now? This is interesting information. I want to know more about this.
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .
Large numbers of users appreciated this project and invite all new participants here, this is a good indicator!
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .The project is very attractive for investments! I believe that in the future will be very successful among users!
I agree with you, the project is successful because it solves the problems that users have. This is the main guarantee of success!Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .The project is very attractive for investments! I believe that in the future will be very successful among users!
I agree with you, the project is successful because it solves the problems that users have. This is the main guarantee of success!Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .The project is very attractive for investments! I believe that in the future will be very successful among users!
I agree with you, the project is successful because it solves the problems that users have. This is the main guarantee of success!Jump to: