Looks like you've attracted some real players.
Good luck with your project.
Topic: Dice-Bet.com 🎲 0.7% House Edge | BTC, LTC, ETH | Play or Invest 🎲 - page 7. (Read 15394 times)
November 25, 2018, 07:27:20 AM
November 24, 2018, 09:34:24 AM
Weekly Update 
November 24, 2018, 12:31:32 AM
Hey pageowner, have you try to get listed there?
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
Hey B_UN1T - I have spoken to NLNico in PM as we would love to be added on his site!
From those conversations he requires new sites be up for some time (more than our few months so far) before he will list them.
So hopefully not too far away
I do hope that your site is going to be listed on dicesites soon because it will boost the attraction to get more players as well. This is indeed a good progress after tou got listed there. With 0.7% house edge it will be enough to players around and bankroll will be increased too since it has 50x leverage which no other site dare to put this on live although may be some of them even have this thought. I do hope your site will be much more better in the future. In the mean time there is no thing to complain about though
. Keep the good workIf they get added on dicesites it will likely increase the bankroll too. As nico's graphs of investor returns on different dice sites is great marketing. Basically the only place that shows all the investor information in one area.
I think in the end house will always winning, the only thing that bothering them is only traffic which is really needed for them fro growing to be a better site in the future. If there is huge bankroll on it and they have low traffic this will just be pointless too since their money flow will be going nowhere. I just wondering why 0.7% house edge cant beat the 1% house edge out there
November 23, 2018, 12:23:59 PM
It looks good.
November 23, 2018, 12:02:49 PM
It will be good if more players will come here.
November 22, 2018, 08:09:54 AM
Hey pageowner, have you try to get listed there?
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
Hey B_UN1T - I have spoken to NLNico in PM as we would love to be added on his site!
From those conversations he requires new sites be up for some time (more than our few months so far) before he will list them.
So hopefully not too far away
I do hope that your site is going to be listed on dicesites soon because it will boost the attraction to get more players as well. This is indeed a good progress after tou got listed there. With 0.7% house edge it will be enough to players around and bankroll will be increased too since it has 50x leverage which no other site dare to put this on live although may be some of them even have this thought. I do hope your site will be much more better in the future. In the mean time there is no thing to complain about though
. Keep the good workIf they get added on dicesites it will likely increase the bankroll too. As nico's graphs of investor returns on different dice sites is great marketing. Basically the only place that shows all the investor information in one area.
November 21, 2018, 11:19:25 AM
Hey pageowner, have you try to get listed there?
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
Hey B_UN1T - I have spoken to NLNico in PM as we would love to be added on his site!
From those conversations he requires new sites be up for some time (more than our few months so far) before he will list them.
So hopefully not too far away
I do hope that your site is going to be listed on dicesites soon because it will boost the attraction to get more players as well. This is indeed a good progress after tou got listed there. With 0.7% house edge it will be enough to players around and bankroll will be increased too since it has 50x leverage which no other site dare to put this on live although may be some of them even have this thought. I do hope your site will be much more better in the future. In the mean time there is no thing to complain about though
. Keep the good work November 21, 2018, 07:25:20 AM
Hey pageowner, have you try to get listed there?
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
Hey B_UN1T - I have spoken to NLNico in PM as we would love to be added on his site!
From those conversations he requires new sites be up for some time (more than our few months so far) before he will list them.
So hopefully not too far away
November 21, 2018, 05:58:46 AM
Hey pageowner, have you try to get listed there?
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
www.dicesites.com
would be nice if we can find you there.
If i take a look on this page there are a lot of old pages they could get removed.
https://dicesites.com/graphs
Here is the link for the thread from NLNico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dicesitescom-list-of-dice-sites-w-statistics-graphs-verifiers-877078
November 19, 2018, 01:40:28 PM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
From what I know, the more is wagered on the site the better for the investors, because any provably fair gambling site is profiting from the house edge(unlike a scam site which is making money from robbing its users). For example, if 1,000 BTC is wagered on a site with 0.7% house edge, then the profit of the site is 7 BTC (on average). So, by taking part in the wagering competition investors are actually doing good for themselves.
Yeah I agree and it is subjective and difficult to work out how valuable it is having more players wager - as does this attract more people to come and play?!
Also on ETH right now if you lose at the expected house edge and get on the leaderboard statistically you should get a bigger prize than what you have wagered. Although that could change if more players come later this month.
November 18, 2018, 07:20:31 PM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
From what I know, the more is wagered on the site the better for the investors, because any provably fair gambling site is profiting from the house edge(unlike a scam site which is making money from robbing its users). For example, if 1,000 BTC is wagered on a site with 0.7% house edge, then the profit of the site is 7 BTC (on average). So, by taking part in the wagering competition investors are actually doing good for themselves.
Yes this is really good competition actually to make investors get their money. But what I saw here is, they really having a good bankroll but it just feel that there is only small players there. Although some big whale may be in and out. I just think that they need to have something better to attract more members and let them stay they wagering. And their chat seems not that active too. Btw I wondering how much wagered that the site made from this event start
November 17, 2018, 01:24:34 PM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
From what I know, the more is wagered on the site the better for the investors, because any provably fair gambling site is profiting from the house edge(unlike a scam site which is making money from robbing its users). For example, if 1,000 BTC is wagered on a site with 0.7% house edge, then the profit of the site is 7 BTC (on average). So, by taking part in the wagering competition investors are actually doing good for themselves.
November 17, 2018, 09:30:24 AM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
I wouldn't be betting against my investment normally (except for my video reviews) but the competition so far looks ev+ especially for ETH.
November 16, 2018, 11:25:03 AM
Weekly Dice-Bet update 
November 16, 2018, 04:56:35 AM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
if he wins some prize at the competition i am sure hes still gonna be in profit
November 16, 2018, 12:21:12 AM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
Yes, this is really weird thing that he did, unless when he tried to wagered he cut down al of his investment but as I can say, this is not a smart thing to do when we are joining some competition. I do not know either he is just trying to promote his site reviews or just having some fun saying unreasonable thing that he did
November 15, 2018, 02:28:13 PM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
November 15, 2018, 01:51:02 PM
If that did happen and they refused to make their profile public we would pay out the prizes to the top 10 wagered players that were public.
So if they were to end up in #1 but refused to be public then the #2 player would win the top price, #3 would get the #2 one and so on.
So the 11th most wagered player whose username are not shown on the leader board might still stand a chance to win a prize from this month wagering tournament if there are players holding a spot in the top 10 list on the leader board who are unwilling to set their profile into public. Since every top wagering players would move up one spot to take up the next prize, it would also meant the 11th most wagered player would win the 10th prize in this scenario. Is that correct?So if they were to end up in #1 but refused to be public then the #2 player would win the top price, #3 would get the #2 one and so on.
That is correct barcode
I like your decision, Dice-Bet. Since there are 3 [HIDDEN] players in the BTC Leaderboard right now, 3 players who may will never even appear there can receive some good prizes.
But I'm wondering, can it be so that those players, who are hidden, are not aware of the ongoing competition? Can you maybe contact them on the site and tell them about what they are going to lose by staying hidden? November 15, 2018, 01:33:11 PM
If that did happen and they refused to make their profile public we would pay out the prizes to the top 10 wagered players that were public.
So if they were to end up in #1 but refused to be public then the #2 player would win the top price, #3 would get the #2 one and so on.
So the 11th most wagered player whose username are not shown on the leader board might still stand a chance to win a prize from this month wagering tournament if there are players holding a spot in the top 10 list on the leader board who are unwilling to set their profile into public. Since every top wagering players would move up one spot to take up the next prize, it would also meant the 11th most wagered player would win the 10th prize in this scenario. Is that correct?So if they were to end up in #1 but refused to be public then the #2 player would win the top price, #3 would get the #2 one and so on.
That is correct barcode
I like your decision, Dice-Bet. Since there are 3 [HIDDEN] players in the BTC Leaderboard right now, 3 players who may will never even appear there can receive some good prizes.
But I'm wondering, can it be so that those players, who are hidden, are not aware of the ongoing competition? Can you maybe contact them on the site and tell them about what they are going to lose by staying hidden? November 15, 2018, 12:29:06 PM
The other option that would probably be easier is that you make the leaderboard public for everyone to see even if they stay hidden.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Then in the settings area in their account you have a button that makes players hidden from the leaderboard and also (explicitly) not eligible for the bonus.
Do you even tried to play on their site? If you do then you do not really need to ask this questions again because everything has been there already. First, leaderboard is already public sowhat you need to do is just to reveal your transparancy about the site. Second, dice-bet scare that anyone that already have wagered huge amount and just because they do not show the status on public then they can't claim it so it just have to be shown for everyone
I am invested in the btc bankroll and I am on the leaderboard for the current wagering competition so yeah I have tried the site. I agree with your points though and will stop bringing this up. It has already been answered enough.
Jump to: