Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 27. (Read 7512 times)

Sez who?

Where did someone say that you are "a fucking idiot who doesn't science?" And what does it mean to "science?"

You are the only one that I know of to suggest something like "a pressurized atmosphere" existing "next to a torr 10^-17 vacuum without a barrier." What does that have to do with landing on the moon, or anything else? Possibly some sci-fi jokers write about something like that in their books. Or somebody who is looking for the supernatural might think about it. Or some scientist might have figured out something that could be scientifically like that. But you are the only one who I have seen talk about it. Why do you?


Now, slow down and read the following while thinking about it.

At the hardware store you can get some square tubing made out of steel or brass or even plastic. Imagine that you have a length of 1-inch square tubing that is 20 miles long, and that is standing on end, with its base being at sea level, and its top reaching straight up into the sky. The tube width/diameter covers one square inch.

At the bottom of the tube, air in the tube is at air pressure at sea level... about 14.7 pounds per square inch. At the top of the tube, the air pressure is so small that it is essentially not measurable. From the base of the tube, as you move upwards, the air pressure gradually drops off from the 14.7psi to the negligible air pressure at the top.

Now, let's say that you took all the air in the tube, and compressed it down into a one cubic inch container. How much would the air in that container weigh? The answer is approximately 14.7 pounds.

In other words, the reason why air pressure is 14.7psi at sea level is because all the weight of the air, in a 1-sq-inch column is 14.7 pounds.

All the "layers" of air are resting on each other, from the surface of the earth on upward. All the air above the sea-level-surface is resting on the sea-level-surface. One square inch width of a column of air weighs 14.7 pounds.

But there would be no air pressure if their wasn't weight. We measure the weight by something we call gravity, or gravitational force. That we know of, all material is affected by gravity, and we can measure the gravity force according to its mass, but only when it is near enough to another mass that it is gravitationally affected by that other mass.


Now, can we please get back to the idea of having landed on the moon or not?

^^^ The Sun, Moon and stars (planets are stars) are projected lights reflecting off of the domes reflective nickel-iron oxide (gold coloured) surface; they are not physical objects.

"Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?" -- Job 37:18, KJV

"Can you, like him, spread out the skies, hard as a cast metal mirror?" -- Job 37:18, ESV

"can you, like Him, spread out the skies to reflect the heat like a mirror of bronze?" -- Job 37:18, BSB



These fell out of the sky:


Image source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esquel_(meteorite)


Image source: https://futurism.com/the-alvord-meteorite

I thought we were discussing the level and amount of the huge piles of shit produced by two mile high Titans who built the dome over the flat Earth. You were arguing it was no more than a few thousand year accumulation, and I was arguing it was many millions of years of accumulation.

Also you never answered how the 32 mile long Moon could move around inside the dome. I know we can see about 59% of it's surface, not 50%. That seems to indicate it's spherical, doesn't it? Does an airplane carry the 32 mile long Moon around? It's pretty big even for those Titans.

^^^ I believe what I can prove and take the rest into consideration.

"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." -- 1 Thessalonians 5:21, KJV

Now since you insist that I'm a fucking idiot who doesn't science, how about you explain how a pressurized atmosphere exists next to a torr 10^-17 vacuum without a barrier and show everybody how ignorant I am?

Well, thank you. But that's just standard for me.

Back when I was in grade school, things like 1+1=2, or 2*2=4, were real difficult for me. I whized through the trig and calculus. It was only later that my teachers realized that I couldn't think in simple ways.

Someday I might be able to get down to your level enough so that I can help you understand. But until that day, you just won't get it.

The beaker is hypothetical, so it will never have or not have compressed air in it.

@BADecker,

   that's the most epic display of mental gymnastics I've ever witnessed. However, either the beaker contains a non-zero quantity of compressed air or outer space is a hoax.

That's idiotic. The two photos of the LEM from different angles are perfectly consistent and there is nothing questionable about the shadows.

It's interesting, and makes your assertions laughable, how crisp and detailed the actual photos are.

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/higher_res/apollo/as11_40_5947.jpg

https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/hires/as11-40-5931.jpg

Is there, perhaps a reason why Moon_Deniers photos are always blurred and terribly poor quality?

Don't be such nuthead, DYOR.

And your friend spentulus does not understand bonus part, so please explain to him.
Here we go, double bonus today, lucky you:

Depends on whether you've got the right kind of air. In Flatland-Dome world most air runs away pretty quick because it's trying to get away from that God-awful-stinking pile of shit outside that dome.

Other kinds of air just sit around, like air with a high concentration of  sativa-dominant hybrid, such as a 4th generation daughter of Ch9 Aroma, like Tangerine. That air, it is all happy air, and it just sits around and yeah, doesn't bother leaving its beaker.

If you seal the top of the beaker, and take it up 20 miles, and take the sealed top off, the air will escape the beaker. Why? Because you have essentially placed the beaker into the vacuum chamber of space.

The gravitational effect on air, causes weight on air at the lower levels, from the weight of the air at the higher levels, so that lower-level air is pushed into the beaker. If there was more air in space, the atmosphere would be thicker, because there would be more air for gravity to suck out of space, and you would have to go up 30 miles. But with conditions of gravity, solar (energy) wind, general cosmic ray energy, etc., as they are, 20 miles will do it.

In other words, the air in the beaker at ground level, is pushed into it by the weight of the air above it. You can test this easily by checking out water pressure increase as you get deeper in the ocean. Works the same way in both cases, but because air is lighter, it takes much more air above it to notice the difference.

^^^ I'll just quote this instead of re-hashing it.

[X-POST]

^^^ You believe that pressurized gas can exist on the surface of a spinning sphere in a 10^-17 torr vacuum without a barrier, and you want to claim my scientific judgment is questionable?

^^^

<--- (((you)))

Yeah, you always suspect a lot of shit, like titans and other insane ''theories''. I mean you literally believe in Titans because there are a few rocks here and there that kind of look like a big foot or a hand, how stupid can someone be, really?

And the universe is the septic tank.     

Perhaps.

But nobatman you and I can agree on the geometrics.

It is one really, truly, huge pile of shit.

^^^ LOL! You're catching up to Sisco.

This is why Sisko is the most badass captain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGcAbI-4_io

 

.

notbatman calculating flat earth.

Star Trek Voyager Admiral Janeway visits Tuvok

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYDRG4PfJSk