Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 335. (Read 3059029 times)
May 01, 2017, 01:12:39 PM
Yeah okay all altcoins like to drop as bitcoin rise a new time high..
May 01, 2017, 01:02:27 PM
Wtf is going on with Digibyte where is the Segwit dream? Its makes no difference and making a move in the opposite detection with a big drop right now.
Panic buy in BTC = panic sell (big sucking sound) in Alts, especially where there were the most profits. Never underestimate the stupidity of the greedy.
May 01, 2017, 12:47:56 PM
Wtf is going on with Digibyte where is the Segwit dream? Its makes no difference and making a move in the opposite detection with a big drop right now.
May 01, 2017, 12:29:34 PM
Not entirely sure what the "Last Change" column on the rich list is. Surely that one at the top (which holds 21% of all DGB ever mined) must have had some movement in the past year?
The good news is that now we have 2 block explorers and we can confirm: https://digiexplorer.info/address/DCo1dbnnwWB4cucwSduXMdTV1tDErZHNfx
That looks like one "whale" of an investor. It looks to me like it was all purchased on the open market, and not exactly at the lows. I'm doing a fairly close analysis, but you can get a general idea by matching time stamps to the historical price chart. A major investor who has made a huge investment and had no problem riding out the storm when price dropped. I would say that this is someone who plans to hold for a long, long time.
Bigger than the next 9 of the top 10 all put together, but they're no slouches either. Fun to look at. For example, #2 looks like an early miner who later did some buying, #3 looks like a pure investor who was last buying at lows last fall, hung on during the dip to 17 SAT, and has recently taken profits (the rich list is not updated to reflect the most recent sells though . . .), #4 bought his/her entire position between 51-55 SAT between June 30 and July 1 last year and had no problem riding out the slump, etc., etc. These DigiBytes are in strong hands.
Not sure if it was the same person but during the pump last year I saw someone put down 400 million at 100 sat. Removed it after a bit as they were trying to force the price down.
There is some major players on Poloniex.
Perhaps, but by the pattern of buys, I'm not too sure he/she cares too much about a few more or a few less (+-100) SAT. Looks like a very long term accumulation when things are looking good (i.e. not much done in the absolute low ranges).
Looks like wallet #5 is a major exchange, probably Poloniex.
Edit: BTW, 66 SAT is the full halfway back (50% retrace).
May 01, 2017, 12:21:48 PM
Edit: Disappointed whale dumps 66 million DGB, but before I posted this. Not my fault!
Just now: 80 million on a hammer down to 51 that closed at 57 (5 min chart). Ouch. The same guy?
Maybe it´s not a guy but a Coinexchange like Litebit.eu dumping a few of the coins they "bought" in the last days.
https://www.litebit.eu/en/buy/digibyte
Could be, but that kind of dumping is indicative of poor money/trade management and I wouldn't expect companies like Litebit to be guilty of that. But anything is possible. They also have restrictions on much they buy and sell at any one time, which you can get around a bit by storing up credits, but even then the amount of coins "available" to be bought or sold is still no where near the amount necessary to cause them to have to immediately "offload" risk in such drastic fashion. That price action looks very emotional to me . . . anything but professional money management.
Edit: the "pros" were most likely on the buy side.
During the last pump I saw a trader place 400 million at 100 sat and remove it, was a fake sell wall. There is 1 or 2 huge holders of digibyte on Poloniex.
May 01, 2017, 12:21:07 PM
Not entirely sure what the "Last Change" column on the rich list is. Surely that one at the top (which holds 21% of all DGB ever mined) must have had some movement in the past year?
The good news is that now we have 2 block explorers and we can confirm: https://digiexplorer.info/address/DCo1dbnnwWB4cucwSduXMdTV1tDErZHNfx
That looks like one "whale" of an investor. It looks to me like it was all purchased on the open market, and not exactly at the lows. I'm doing a fairly close analysis, but you can get a general idea by matching time stamps to the historical price chart. A major investor who has made a huge investment and had no problem riding out the storm when price dropped. I would say that this is someone who plans to hold for a long, long time.
Bigger than the next 9 of the top 10 all put together, but they're no slouches either. Fun to look at. For example, #2 looks like an early miner who later did some buying, #3 looks like a pure investor who was last buying at lows last fall, hung on during the dip to 17 SAT, and has recently taken profits (the rich list is not updated to reflect the most recent sells though . . .), #4 bought his/her entire position between 51-55 SAT between June 30 and July 1 last year and had no problem riding out the slump, etc., etc. These DigiBytes are in strong hands.
Not sure if it was the same person but during the pump last year I saw someone put down 400 million at 100 sat. Removed it after a bit as they were trying to force the price down.
There is some major players on Poloniex.
May 01, 2017, 10:07:44 AM
Not entirely sure what the "Last Change" column on the rich list is. Surely that one at the top (which holds 21% of all DGB ever mined) must have had some movement in the past year?
The good news is that now we have 2 block explorers and we can confirm: https://digiexplorer.info/address/DCo1dbnnwWB4cucwSduXMdTV1tDErZHNfx
That looks like one "whale" of an investor. It looks to me like it was all purchased on the open market, and not exactly at the lows. I'm doing a fairly close analysis, but you can get a general idea by matching time stamps to the historical price chart. A major investor who has made a huge investment and had no problem riding out the storm when price dropped. I would say that this is someone who plans to hold for a long, long time.
Bigger than the next 9 of the top 10 all put together, but they're no slouches either. Fun to look at. For example, #2 looks like an early miner who later did some buying, #3 looks like a pure investor who was last buying at lows last fall, hung on during the dip to 17 SAT, and has recently taken profits (the rich list is not updated to reflect the most recent sells though . . .), #4 bought his/her entire position between 51-55 SAT between June 30 and July 1 last year and had no problem riding out the slump, etc., etc. These DigiBytes are in strong hands.
Edit: the DigiByte explorer just went live today and it looks like raw data is still being processed for the first time as some of these have changed ranking already - for example, what I thought might be a major exchange that was ranked #5 is now, around 8 hours later, ranked #7, #3 is now #5, #4 is now #3, etc. Just be aware that it's still "bootstrapping".
May 01, 2017, 08:41:13 AM
Hey, hey, hey. How about that? We’ve got a working rich list! https://i.imgur.com/xUfqLxL.jpg
Geographical distribution. https://i.imgur.com/Wip6geO.jpg
The Raw Transaction for that 1st ever SegWit transaction!
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgb/tx.dws?5b04736f8058cc42d3fa54ac1a8b05ace47fc5a82095989f66067415ad49b28e.htm
And lots more at: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgb/
Cheers!
Not entirely sure what the "Last Change" column on the rich list is. Surely that one at the top (which holds 21% of all DGB ever mined) must have had some movement in the past year?
May 01, 2017, 07:34:51 AM
Are there any big business backing Digibyte like how Google backs ripple?
May 01, 2017, 06:27:33 AM
Hey, hey, hey. How about that? We’ve got a working rich list! https://i.imgur.com/xUfqLxL.jpg
Geographical distribution. https://i.imgur.com/Wip6geO.jpg
The Raw Transaction for that 1st ever SegWit transaction!
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgb/tx.dws?5b04736f8058cc42d3fa54ac1a8b05ace47fc5a82095989f66067415ad49b28e.htm
And lots more at: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgb/
Cheers!
May 01, 2017, 04:55:09 AM
Maybe ...a Poll...would be able to tell us.....what each of these groups are interested in....exactly.
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
On the simplest level, this is what I see:
Devs want people to use their coin to increase it's value, and their profits.
Miners/traders want people to use the coin to increase it's value, and their profits.
General public wants a coin that is easy to use and accepted everywhere. If it's not as convienant to use as paypal/credit card, the general public isn't interested.
Right now crypto is only available to those willing to go through all of the barriers to entry to obtain them, and there aren't many good reasons to have them as a consumer. Without the Silk Road making it worthwhile for people to want to figure BTC out, it never would have gained it's initial traction. There currently isn't a single reason why the average-joe should use crypto instead of fiat for a legal purchase. This is what holds us back.
In my opinion, dgb development needs to focus on an easy-to-use wallet with built in fiat/dgb transactions, and lightning network with the intent of targeting Point-of-Sale systems and payment processors. If we want a healthy crypto-economy, we need commerce. To increase commerce we must address the issues preventing businesses from accepting crypto as payment. The most common complaints I've heard from business owners are Confirmations Times, Price Volatility and taxes. Lighting network will solve transaction times, and enable dgb to utilize smart contracts like ethereum. Price stability and taxes are harder to solve, but not impossible. One solution is a 3rd Party payment processor that bears the risk of price fluctuations for a transaction fee. The payment processor converts DGB to fiat, so the business never has to interface with crypto at all, and doesn't need to worry about the capital gains/losses of dealing with crypto on their taxes. We need crypto that "just works."
Well said. This sums it up and is abolutely true. One possibility is to get DGB on an existing payment processor or establish one primarily for DGB.
While I believe that the shareholder's main goal is a store of value that is => his or her original purchase price, I also agree that ease of use from a payment perspective is also very important. (A chicken or the egg argument?)
Here are some links to payment processing options. The Bitcoin only sites are obviously not very likely, but imagine if DigiByte could make a breakthrough with one of them! Imagine DGB on Coinbase! Okay, almost impossible, but with the right person making the right contacts, and a little persistence and staying power, we might change that assessment to "sooner or later" (which should be the idea with everything we talk about - where there's a will, there's a way).
http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/05/22/shapeshift-io-partners-with-crypto-payment-processor-coinpayments-net/
https://www.coinpayments.net/supported-coins
https://www.coinbase.com/
https://bitpay.com/
https://www.gocoin.com/
https://cryptopay.me/
DYI (not so easy):
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/20172/how-to-make-a-payment-processor-like-bitpay
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0070.mediawiki
May 01, 2017, 04:32:31 AM
It seems like the DigiByte Gaming website can't put any DGB into my wallet and I read the notice on the side that popped up which said
"We are pausing all payouts until we fix some issues with exploits in payout API interface. Than you for your understanding."
Does this mean all rewards and points can't be credited anymore? For example if I win a league of legends game will I still get 1 DGB?
Or does it just mean that they're still credited and you can't transfer any out of the website for now?
I'm confused...
Any idea when this will be fixed?
Any answers are helpful, thanks.
"We are pausing all payouts until we fix some issues with exploits in payout API interface. Than you for your understanding."
Does this mean all rewards and points can't be credited anymore? For example if I win a league of legends game will I still get 1 DGB?
Or does it just mean that they're still credited and you can't transfer any out of the website for now?
I'm confused...
Any idea when this will be fixed?
Any answers are helpful, thanks.
May 01, 2017, 04:26:11 AM
Maybe ...a Poll...would be able to tell us.....what each of these groups are interested in....exactly.
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
On the simplest level, this is what I see:
Devs want people to use their coin to increase it's value, and their profits.
Miners/traders want people to use the coin to increase it's value, and their profits.
General public wants a coin that is easy to use and accepted everywhere. If it's not as convienant to use as paypal/credit card, the general public isn't interested.
Right now crypto is only available to those willing to go through all of the barriers to entry to obtain them, and there aren't many good reasons to have them as a consumer. Without the Silk Road making it worthwhile for people to want to figure BTC out, it never would have gained it's initial traction. There currently isn't a single reason why the average-joe should use crypto instead of fiat for a legal purchase. This is what holds us back.
In my opinion, dgb development needs to focus on an easy-to-use wallet with built in fiat/dgb transactions, and lightning network with the intent of targeting Point-of-Sale systems and payment processors. If we want a healthy crypto-economy, we need commerce. To increase commerce we must address the issues preventing businesses from accepting crypto as payment. The most common complaints I've heard from business owners are Confirmations Times, Price Volatility and taxes. Lighting network will solve transaction times, and enable dgb to utilize smart contracts like ethereum. Price stability and taxes are harder to solve, but not impossible. One solution is a 3rd Party payment processor that bears the risk of price fluctuations for a transaction fee. The payment processor converts DGB to fiat, so the business never has to interface with crypto at all, and doesn't need to worry about the capital gains/losses of dealing with crypto on their taxes. We need crypto that "just works."
Well said. This sums it up and is abolutely true. One possibility is to get DGB on an existing payment processor or establish one primarily for DGB.
May 01, 2017, 02:34:05 AM
Very 1st ever $DGB SegWit transaction on live DigiByte blockchain sent from HongKong to Australia!
https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin/status/858932036295196672
https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin/status/858932036295196672
So you guys are continuing to work?
That's a joke. Of course you are, and it's good to know what you're up to, even if it's just a one line "progress report". And I mean that seriously.
Another first. Very nice. May the list never end!
By the way, what plans are there for updating digiexplorer so everyone can easily see all pertinent data? Do you have any particulars on that yet?
May 01, 2017, 01:34:57 AM
Very 1st ever $DGB SegWit transaction on live DigiByte blockchain sent from HongKong to Australia!
https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin/status/858932036295196672
https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin/status/858932036295196672
April 30, 2017, 06:38:20 PM
Maybe ...a Poll...would be able to tell us.....what each of these groups are interested in....exactly.
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
On the simplest level, this is what I see:
Devs want people to use their coin to increase it's value, and their profits.
Miners/traders want people to use the coin to increase it's value, and their profits.
General public wants a coin that is easy to use and accepted everywhere. If it's not as convienant to use as paypal/credit card, the general public isn't interested.
Right now crypto is only available to those willing to go through all of the barriers to entry to obtain them, and there aren't many good reasons to have them as a consumer. Without the Silk Road making it worthwhile for people to want to figure BTC out, it never would have gained it's initial traction. There currently isn't a single reason why the average-joe should use crypto instead of fiat for a legal purchase. This is what holds us back.
In my opinion, dgb development needs to focus on an easy-to-use wallet with built in fiat/dgb transactions, and lightning network with the intent of targeting Point-of-Sale systems and payment processors. If we want a healthy crypto-economy, we need commerce. To increase commerce we must address the issues preventing businesses from accepting crypto as payment. The most common complaints I've heard from business owners are Confirmations Times, Price Volatility and taxes. Lighting network will solve transaction times, and enable dgb to utilize smart contracts like ethereum. Price stability and taxes are harder to solve, but not impossible. One solution is a 3rd Party payment processor that bears the risk of price fluctuations for a transaction fee. The payment processor converts DGB to fiat, so the business never has to interface with crypto at all, and doesn't need to worry about the capital gains/losses of dealing with crypto on their taxes. We need crypto that "just works."
April 30, 2017, 04:21:22 PM
Maybe ...a Poll...would be able to tell us.....what each of these groups are interested in....exactly.
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
Keep in mind....that Investors....spend "serious" money, to "make" ....serious money.
Thats the only reason....mining is apealling...to anyone.
Could the General Public make ..."serious money"....mining .."on the side"?
I would say that ...the "appeal" factor.....for those two groups....when it comes to mining.....are on TOTALLY opposite sides, of the "spectrum" ^^"
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
A Poll for the General Public...would confirm whether or not, my suspisions are correct ^^"
Do they "want" to make money...with DGB ...by doing what ..."Investors" do? (e.g mining)
Or do they just want things cheaper?
Keep in mind....that Investors....spend "serious" money, to "make" ....serious money.
Thats the only reason....mining is apealling...to anyone.
Could the General Public make ..."serious money"....mining .."on the side"?
I would say that ...the "appeal" factor.....for those two groups....when it comes to mining.....are on TOTALLY opposite sides, of the "spectrum" ^^"
I dunno hehe ^^...but thats how "id" find out my answers ^^
April 30, 2017, 03:26:31 PM
When i "Think" about it....
I "see" ....3 "Parties"....in "this" game...each , with its own "interests"....
- The Creator of DGB
- The Investors (Miners + Traders)
- The General Public
...I believe each Parties interests to be completely..."unique"....from eachother...
And the Success of "this" coin will depend ..largely...on ...prioritizing each of these "interests"....in the "correct" order... (whatever that may be ^^")
..but if i were to take a "crack" at it...i would say that...
- The Creator of DGB likely has "ideals/dreams" for this coin...more so "focused" on ..."moral values"...of whatever kind.
- The Investors.....are simply interested in "profit"....plain and simple.
- The General Public....just want things, for "cheaper".
Forcing the "interests" of "One" of these groups...upon another group....will likely end up in a fail....they must be kept seperate, and prioritized correctly...
....maybe im talking crap hehe...but im just trying be "real" here...and throw out ...any ideas....that could benefit DGB.....or potentially harm it.
If these 3 entities "interests", are prioritized in the correct order...i personally think....you will find success , then ^^"
I dunno....thats just my 2 cents worth hehe ^^"
I "see" ....3 "Parties"....in "this" game...each , with its own "interests"....
- The Creator of DGB
- The Investors (Miners + Traders)
- The General Public
...I believe each Parties interests to be completely..."unique"....from eachother...
And the Success of "this" coin will depend ..largely...on ...prioritizing each of these "interests"....in the "correct" order... (whatever that may be ^^")
..but if i were to take a "crack" at it...i would say that...
- The Creator of DGB likely has "ideals/dreams" for this coin...more so "focused" on ..."moral values"...of whatever kind.
- The Investors.....are simply interested in "profit"....plain and simple.
- The General Public....just want things, for "cheaper".
Forcing the "interests" of "One" of these groups...upon another group....will likely end up in a fail....they must be kept seperate, and prioritized correctly...
....maybe im talking crap hehe...but im just trying be "real" here...and throw out ...any ideas....that could benefit DGB.....or potentially harm it.
If these 3 entities "interests", are prioritized in the correct order...i personally think....you will find success , then ^^"
I dunno....thats just my 2 cents worth hehe ^^"
April 30, 2017, 11:52:24 AM
I have over to 50 million DGB now, I'm not going anywhere! Moon or bust!
April 30, 2017, 10:27:23 AM
I don't get it, you guys have nothing smarter to do than to came here and brag about your lost/bad projects ? You are all pathetic ( MYR and GRS ) trolls.
Digibyte was this first coin on Poloniex to activate Segwit. Being first on Poloniex is actually being first in crypto. Coins not on Poloniex are a waste of fucking space and time.
Are you sure that DGB was first on Poloniex ? SYS is on poloniex too.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/syscoin-becomes-first-cryptocurrency-to-debut-mainnet-lightning-network
Look at the prices of MYR and Shadowcash after they getting removed from Poloniex. Shadowcash has crashed from $15 - $20 million to $3 million marketcap.
This is the one danger of dgb and all traders must do there best to keep dgb on Poloniex. I provide some fake volume at times when there isn't a pump taking place. Getting removed from Poloniex is a death sentence for any coin.
You are wrong because SDC going to remove from polo because Dev Team make swap this coin to new project tradeplatform PARTICL token in new ICO form to take funds for developing and expanse. So SDC its not crashed by polo remove but is removed because its not support more by dev team after end of swap its meaning its abandon now and almost all coins was swaped.
Myr its crap so they are remove from polo.
Sry bad english.
Jump to: