Is it just me who believes that current DAO/ETH fuck ups should bring more attention to "pure currency" cryptos like DGB?
Digibyte and Gulden will do well within the next year. Have to wait for this btc halving to be done with, until then hold strong and buy low!
As per my post in June:
Gulden is finally catching digibyte in marketcap, which means digibyte is most likely due for a rally within 6 months. Gulden has always followed digibytes price movements. As you people can see these are the 2 best coins for long term.
DigiByte marketcap $2,580,211
Gulden marketcap $1,938,514
I never used the words caught up. I said catching up, Guldens marketcap was under $700k less then a month ago.
Guldens marketcap won't hold as it's not on Poloniex and it's a pre pump for their 1.6.0 release. Watch the price crash after.
Digibyte marketcap trippled when it was added to Poloniex and has kept growing on average ever since. Poloniex is the biggest exchange in the world and if your coin is not on Poloniex it has no hope.
I sold out on Gulden like I did with AUR, I don't own anymore countrycoins. The profits I used to buy up dgb on both those coins. The dutch can never win a world Cup final , how they going to win at crypto and both NLG and AUR are run by the Dutch.
Gulden price will collapse like AUR did.
I am all in on dgb and myriad for my alt coins.
Dgb has the marketing edge on 99% of the coins in crypto and why it will win.
i don't think it has the marketing edge... bitcoin and some of the major others have users that promote it endlessly plus businesses visibility so i think thats a little bit over the top statement wise.
1 thing i will say about digibyte that got me here in the first place was the target to be a microtransaction currency. Its 21 billion isn't it so its not over inflated supply wise its pure mining not proof of stake which stops the constant supply hitting from no work bar holding at a point and dev does provide coin updates as well as projects like dgb gaming etc (which i saw are open sourced except dgb gaming).
People wanting crypto to become mainstream have to realise that its all about the speed and micro transactions. Bitcoins 7 transactions a second doesn't cut it but then again its not designed to be a micro transaction currency so it does what it does well.
DGB at present only lacks a few things slowing it down. That is a niche with a following and an idiot proof easy way to spend (all cryptos seem to have this issue).
On the niche part it needs
- acceptance by online stores en mass
- gaming websites and services that encourage rapid use of the currency and movement of coins between people. Values not important its the fact it transitions from person a to person b in exchange for something and happens a lot.
On the idiot proof easy way to use
- people don't want to see long ass public keys and the like. The want a token they can swipe on something that says pay now, they want to tap an account name like a bank account and then provide some kind of mechanism authorising the spend which something unique to them that they are or know. Wallets and devices should hide all this technical cryptography references and have only displayed labels like savings, spend1, spend2. 1 time address use thats fine... keep the label auto backup the stuff it creates... the user shouldn't have to do anything technical or protective of their funds. People don't want their assets and money to be something they have to babysit and micromanage on a technical level.
Im not sure why this part hasn't been address in crypto yet full stop.
Digibyte will grow i've increased my holdings. Im not up to the 109 million i once owned but getting there... i think as a currency it has a nice future as long as the dev stays ahead of any other coins entering the marketplace... well mico currencies that is.
People don't want anonymity nor do they want gizmos and irc channels and other shit in their wallets. They just want to be able to spend their money easy and fast.
