Author

Topic: Do you believe in god? - page 124. (Read 316215 times)

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 28, 2017, 10:14:40 PM
You are so full of shit.

Since I am speaking the truth, then my logic is correct. There is no god.

Trust me.... I would not miss. It would be your god's will.

(I am actually a nice guy and don't believe in violence, so you are safe my friend.  Smiley)

You still haven't found any rebuttal or refutation of the scientific evidence and proof that shows God exists:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

This means that your logic is only correct for yourself and those who want to follow your religion with you.

However, thanks again for admitting that God exists by not being able to rebut the science.

Cool

Here you go.....


Link 1.
Machine: You state that all machines that people make and use come from examples of machines in the universe. You then stretch this to state that because the machines become more advanced they are the product of a higher power and more advanced maker - God. Wrong! This is called advancement in Technology. Usually done in a manner of trial and error. Look at planes. There were many failures before success. According to you, this means that man is god.


Actually, this isn't completely what I have stated in the links. While I stated that all machines that people make and use come from examples of machines in the universe, I never state that because the machines become more advanced they are the product of a higher power and more advanced maker - God.

The thing that I state about this is that all machines have makers. The machines of nature (which are way more advanced than our machines) must have had an advanced maker. Because of how greatly ahead of us the machines of nature are, the Machine Maker of nature and the universe would fit our definition of "God."

Are you intentionally twisting what I said? Or do you simply have lower reading comprehension?

Cool



This process is called "evolution". Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.

As we learn more about objects "through science" we are able to understand how they have come to be and why this has occurred.

The answers are being discovered and they do not rely on a "god principle".
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
February 28, 2017, 10:10:22 AM
I do believe in God and I think there are so many bad things because there is also evil presence

Yes, I agree with you.
We can't win evil forces alone.
We need heavenly protection and guidance every day.
If we can lead such way, we will be stronger and have more happy life.
Yes, I believe in God.
I also believe that God gave us absolute moral standard and guidance, through the Bible, in order that we can understand purpose of our life, and live happy and joyful life.


sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 329
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
February 28, 2017, 10:06:50 AM
Yes I do believe in God,
There is so many reason to believe in god and one of them is being alive,
We should be thankful for waking up everymorning cause god give us another day to live .
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
February 28, 2017, 09:59:17 AM
I do believe in God and I think there are so many bad things because there is also evil presence
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 28, 2017, 09:29:06 AM

Nations look for god: You speak as though you know the minds of all people. Assuming that everyone knows in their hearts that they believe in your god. That is not possible for you to know what anyone else thinks or feels. This is complete crap. In ancient times the majority of the people were religious. Throughout history people have gravitated away from religion for whatever reason they choose. You cannot assume anything about another person.

Not the minds. The hearts. However, tell me where the person is who doesn't need air to breathe, water to drink, food to eat, clothing and shelter, and all the other things people need. If such a person existed, he wouldn't be a person. He would be something else. All people are essentially the same kind of thing.

Among the things that a person doesn't know is what will happen in the future, even the next second. The stability of the universe makes it look like some people know the future. But nobody really knows. How can anyone tell this? By the fact that there are too many cause and effect actions happening on all things all the time. Nobody can know enough of them to do anything other than guess about the future.

This is why all people look for God. The machine workings of nature are part of the evidence that shows them that God exists. With enough persistent self-training, a person can talk himself out of believing in God formally. But give a person great joy, or give him great pain and sorrow, and he won't be able to maintain his personal self-training. Rather, he will revert to recognizing that God exists.

Thanks, again, for helping to prove that God exists.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 28, 2017, 09:18:05 AM

Cause and effect: I agree about your simple logic of cause and effect, however, you fail to prove that the first instance was a "god". Everything reverts back to a single point which you assume is god. That is only a theory. To go back to a single point, your belief that randomness cannot exist because it cannot be proven. But what about if our universe that we live in was the product of a random event in a universe older than ours? We do not have the technology to visit this universe to prove this correct or not correct. This is where you fail with your proof. You have cut yourself off from the possibility that another universe has caused something for us to exist in our universe.  

You haven't looked thoroughly enough through the links. You missed the part where it talks about the game of billiards/pool. I'll restate briefly.

A pool shark might be able to predict where a string of five balls that he hits are going to go. He might be able to predict that ball 1 will hit ball 2 which will hit ball 3 which will ht ball 4 which will knock ball 5 into that corner pocket. The pool shark is very good if he can do this kind of predicting every time.

Cause and effect has done this with countless electrons, protons, neutrons, atoms, molecules, photons, electromagnetic waves, etc., etc., throughout the universe. The result is complexity that boggles the mind, and will never be able to be understood. Because of the complexity that has come about through cause and effect, there is Something very intelligent and very capable at the beginning of all this complexity. That Something fits our definition of God.

As far as pure random goes, we have no example of it, while we have countless examples of cause and effect. All kinds of things can be guessed at, but the proofs of the things that have been proven - cause and effect and complexity - prove God.

Thanks again for upholding the proof that God exists.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 28, 2017, 09:04:34 AM
You are so full of shit.

Since I am speaking the truth, then my logic is correct. There is no god.

Trust me.... I would not miss. It would be your god's will.

(I am actually a nice guy and don't believe in violence, so you are safe my friend.  Smiley)

You still haven't found any rebuttal or refutation of the scientific evidence and proof that shows God exists:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

This means that your logic is only correct for yourself and those who want to follow your religion with you.

However, thanks again for admitting that God exists by not being able to rebut the science.

Cool

Here you go.....


Link 1.
Machine: You state that all machines that people make and use come from examples of machines in the universe. You then stretch this to state that because the machines become more advanced they are the product of a higher power and more advanced maker - God. Wrong! This is called advancement in Technology. Usually done in a manner of trial and error. Look at planes. There were many failures before success. According to you, this means that man is god.


Actually, this isn't completely what I have stated in the links. While I stated that all machines that people make and use come from examples of machines in the universe, I never state that because the machines become more advanced they are the product of a higher power and more advanced maker - God.

The thing that I state about this is that all machines have makers. The machines of nature (which are way more advanced than our machines) must have had an advanced maker. Because of how greatly ahead of us the machines of nature are, the Machine Maker of nature and the universe would fit our definition of "God."

Are you intentionally twisting what I said? Or do you simply have lower reading comprehension?

Cool

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 28, 2017, 06:49:51 AM
You are so full of shit.

Since I am speaking the truth, then my logic is correct. There is no god.

Trust me.... I would not miss. It would be your god's will.

(I am actually a nice guy and don't believe in violence, so you are safe my friend.  Smiley)

You still haven't found any rebuttal or refutation of the scientific evidence and proof that shows God exists:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

This means that your logic is only correct for yourself and those who want to follow your religion with you.

However, thanks again for admitting that God exists by not being able to rebut the science.

Cool

Here you go.....


Link 1.
Machine: You state that all machines that people make and use come from examples of machines in the universe. You then stretch this to state that because the machines become more advanced they are the product of a higher power and more advanced maker - God. Wrong! This is called advancement in Technology. Usually done in a manner of trial and error. Look at planes. There were many failures before success. According to you, this means that man is god.

Cause and effect: I agree about your simple logic of cause and effect, however, you fail to prove that the first instance was a "god". Everything reverts back to a single point which you assume is god. That is only a theory. To go back to a single point, your belief that randomness cannot exist because it cannot be proven. But what about if our universe that we live in was the product of a random event in a universe older than ours? We do not have the technology to visit this universe to prove this correct or not correct. This is where you fail with your proof. You have cut yourself off from the possibility that another universe has caused something for us to exist in our universe.  

Nations look for god: You speak as though you know the minds of all people. Assuming that everyone knows in their hearts that they believe in your god. That is not possible for you to know what anyone else thinks or feels. This is complete crap. In ancient times the majority of the people were religious. Throughout history people have gravitated away from religion for whatever reason they choose. You cannot assume anything about another person.

Link 2.
Cause and effect. See above

Link 3.
Cause and effect - See above

Link 4.
Cause and effect - See above

This means that your logic is only correct for yourself and those who want to follow your religion with you.

However, thanks again for allowing me to post this to prove that you are delusional with your thinking and are grasping at straws to prove a mute point.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
February 28, 2017, 06:17:10 AM
recently i seriously started to consider that the universe itself is inteligent in the way it responds to you via people and environment, it would mean that we live in some kind of a simluation like a video game which generates itself in vastly speed, a proof for that is that the deeper u look into something to more infinite information about it is beeing created. for example if u look with a teleskope into the universe or if u look with a microscope into the matter itself new things are beeing created.

This is good thinking. But consider...

Entropy shows that there was a beginning. If there wasn't, everything would have dispersed and diffused into simplicity away from complexity long ago... because of entropy.

Also, cause and effect shows that everything is the effect of one or more causes. At the same time, there is nothing that we even have a hint of that could have caused the complexity after so many years of cause and effect. After all, especially in entropy, things start to become simpler after cause and effect happens to them over and over. They don't remain complex.

The point? The universe was started by Something very great and full of knowledge and power, outside of the universe, because there is no evidence of it within the universe. The universe is not old, but young, because if it were old, the complexity would have been reduce a lot further by entropy.

Cool

i think the entire IT development is some kind of a book the universe shows us how intelligence gets created from the bits of 0 and 1 of light and darkness all those high complex systems get into existance
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 28, 2017, 03:30:05 AM
You are so full of shit.

Since I am speaking the truth, then my logic is correct. There is no god.

Trust me.... I would not miss. It would be your god's will.

(I am actually a nice guy and don't believe in violence, so you are safe my friend.  Smiley)

You still haven't found any rebuttal or refutation of the scientific evidence and proof that shows God exists:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

This means that your logic is only correct for yourself and those who want to follow your religion with you.

However, thanks again for admitting that God exists by not being able to rebut the science.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 28, 2017, 03:24:53 AM

Just a quick rebuttal for illustration point:

Psalm 18:30 states "As for God, his way is perfect"

Matthew 5:48 "You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect".

Genesis 1:27  "So God created mankind in his own image"

So after reading this, you can see that the christian bible believes their god to be perfect, and man was made in his image which correlates to man being perfect.

The problem with this is...... man is not perfect. We are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and with age our bodies and minds break down. Our poorly-made spines, inflexible knees, and pelvic bones make childbirth difficult.

So, if man is not perfect, then neither is your god, so the words of your god are false, or, he does not exist.

Another religion facet of disproving gods...... Science is slowly providing the answers to questions which were once believed to be the result off a god/s. The Greeks used Poseidon to explain how earthquakes happen, which we now know is due to the movement of tectonic plates to relieve pressure.


Perhaps you are not human. If you are not, if you are an angel of God, then maybe you are perfect.

If you are human, your logic is imperfect.


God gave mankind perfection in the Garden of Eden. Mankind could do no better than perfection. But, like the curious people we are, our first parents threw that perfection away intentionally.

So, you are wrong, because you are living in imperfection, and your words are your own. But I am right, because even though I am living in imperfection like you, I am simply referring to the perfect Word of God in my explanation.

And tectonic plate movement is due to cause and effect of all kinds of things... cause and effect that God set in place.

When are you going to stop being so dense, intentionally. You enjoy the imperfection. You revel in it. At least I am trying to move towards perfection.

Cool

And the circle continues.......

As I am human, my logic may be imperfect.

That also implies that as you are human, your understanding of your religion is also imperfect.

So, maybe your understanding that there is a god is false.

OMG..... your reasoning of cause and effect is crazy.

If I were to meet you and punch you in the face, the cause was because you were preaching to me, the effect you have a broken jaw and cannot speak. Does that mean your god hates you?

Haven't you ever noticed that things are not utterly imperfect. A car works, even though it is imperfect enough that it wears out after a while.

Since I am only restating the perfection of God in the Bible, even though my restating is imperfect, I am basically right. You can go to the Bible to read the perfection yourself. Just be aware that you will come away with an imperfect understanding of it because of your imperfection.

If we met, and you attempted to punch me in the face, you would miss. You would miss, because God wants you to live long enough to find Jesus salvation.

Cool

You are so full of shit.

Since I am speaking the truth, then my logic is correct. There is no god.

Trust me.... I would not miss. It would be your god's will.

(I am actually a nice guy and don't believe in violence, so you are safe my friend.  Smiley)
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 28, 2017, 03:20:04 AM

Just a quick rebuttal for illustration point:

Psalm 18:30 states "As for God, his way is perfect"

Matthew 5:48 "You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect".

Genesis 1:27  "So God created mankind in his own image"

So after reading this, you can see that the christian bible believes their god to be perfect, and man was made in his image which correlates to man being perfect.

The problem with this is...... man is not perfect. We are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and with age our bodies and minds break down. Our poorly-made spines, inflexible knees, and pelvic bones make childbirth difficult.

So, if man is not perfect, then neither is your god, so the words of your god are false, or, he does not exist.

Another religion facet of disproving gods...... Science is slowly providing the answers to questions which were once believed to be the result off a god/s. The Greeks used Poseidon to explain how earthquakes happen, which we now know is due to the movement of tectonic plates to relieve pressure.


Perhaps you are not human. If you are not, if you are an angel of God, then maybe you are perfect.

If you are human, your logic is imperfect.


God gave mankind perfection in the Garden of Eden. Mankind could do no better than perfection. But, like the curious people we are, our first parents threw that perfection away intentionally.

So, you are wrong, because you are living in imperfection, and your words are your own. But I am right, because even though I am living in imperfection like you, I am simply referring to the perfect Word of God in my explanation.

And tectonic plate movement is due to cause and effect of all kinds of things... cause and effect that God set in place.

When are you going to stop being so dense, intentionally. You enjoy the imperfection. You revel in it. At least I am trying to move towards perfection.

Cool

And the circle continues.......

As I am human, my logic may be imperfect.

That also implies that as you are human, your understanding of your religion is also imperfect.

So, maybe your understanding that there is a god is false.

OMG..... your reasoning of cause and effect is crazy.

If I were to meet you and punch you in the face, the cause was because you were preaching to me, the effect you have a broken jaw and cannot speak. Does that mean your god hates you?

Haven't you ever noticed that things are not utterly imperfect. A car works, even though it is imperfect enough that it wears out after a while.

Since I am only restating the perfection of God in the Bible, even though my restating is imperfect, I am basically right. You can go to the Bible to read the perfection yourself. Just be aware that you will come away with an imperfect understanding of it because of your imperfection.

If we met, and you attempted to punch me in the face, you would miss. You would miss, because God wants you to live long enough to find Jesus salvation.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 28, 2017, 03:10:32 AM

And science fact expresses some of the world we live in. That same science fact proves God exists.

Cool

No  it does not. You make the mistake with your science and jump to conclusions which then allow you to assume.

That is the problem with your science.

That has been stated in many forums. Usually when you post your links. I think you need to read the replies to your posts a little better.

The evidence and proof expressed here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380,
show the step-by-step process whereby God can be proven to exist. This is not my science, except that I acknowledge it. This is standard, fundamental science fact that can be found in virtually all the libraries in America, and in thousands of websites around the world.

So far, you haven't shown a step-by-step process of rebuttal. You probably don't have such a process, even in mind. This means that you are unwilling to accept science fact. And that's okay. Your religion is simply similar to that of many other atheists who do the same.

As far as statements in forums, anybody can make statements. Go to any church and listen to the sermon. Statements all over the place. Tis the same with the atheism religion, except that the atheism statements are often made from the lectern rather than the pulpit.

If replies to my posts were anything that had substance, rather than the simple political talk, talk, talk that they are, you might have some scientifically factual rebuttal to the proof that God exists.

Cool

But BADecker your posts are biblical talk talk talk with no sense.

They start off making sense then you make assumptions and they go nowhere.

I actually found your arguments to hold sense "originally" but now you have been rebutted and all you do is repeat the same nonsense which has been disproved.

Then when you have no more arguments you bring out your same old posts that you yourself wrote.

You are in a crazed cycle of denial.

I recommend anyone to read your posts and they will see the falsehood of your claims.

Not all my posts are biblical talk. Nothing in the proof for the existence of God, as listed in the above links, is Biblical talk. It is science fact talk. However, there's tons of information in the Bible that make the best sense of anything.

The only rebuttal to the proof that God exists, is the rebuttal of political science. Political science is simply a science of attempting to out-talk someone else. It includes lies. We are talking political science in many things that we talk. But, anyone who goes to the above links and looks for proof that God exists, will find such proof. This includes you, even though you keep on talking political science in the form of lying about what you have found.

Hey, and thanks again for helping to confirm the proofs for the existence of God, by not even showing one rebuttal, but simply saying that you have shown rebuttal.

Cool

Just a quick rebuttal for illustration point:

Psalm 18:30 states "As for God, his way is perfect"

Matthew 5:48 "You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect".

Genesis 1:27  "So God created mankind in his own image"

So after reading this, you can see that the christian bible believes their god to be perfect, and man was made in his image which correlates to man being perfect.

The problem with this is...... man is not perfect. We are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and with age our bodies and minds break down. Our poorly-made spines, inflexible knees, and pelvic bones make childbirth difficult.

So, if man is not perfect, then neither is your god, so the words of your god are false, or, he does not exist.

Another religion facet of disproving gods...... Science is slowly providing the answers to questions which were once believed to be the result off a god/s. The Greeks used Poseidon to explain how earthquakes happen, which we now know is due to the movement of tectonic plates to relieve pressure.


Perhaps you are not human. If you are not, if you are an angel of God, then maybe you are perfect.

If you are human, your logic is imperfect.


God gave mankind perfection in the Garden of Eden. Mankind could do no better than perfection. But, like the curious people we are, our first parents threw that perfection away intentionally.

So, you are wrong, because you are living in imperfection, and your words are your own. But I am right, because even though I am living in imperfection like you, I am simply referring to the perfect Word of God in my explanation.

And tectonic plate movement is due to cause and effect of all kinds of things... cause and effect that God set in place.

When are you going to stop being so dense, intentionally. You enjoy the imperfection. You revel in it. At least I am trying to move towards perfection.

Cool

And the circle continues.......

As I am human, my logic may be imperfect.

That also implies that as you are human, your understanding of your religion is also imperfect.

So, maybe your understanding that there is a god is false.

OMG..... your reasoning of cause and effect is crazy.

If I were to meet you and punch you in the face, the cause was because you were preaching to me, the effect you have a broken jaw and cannot speak. Does that mean your god hates you?
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 28, 2017, 03:00:34 AM

And science fact expresses some of the world we live in. That same science fact proves God exists.

Cool

No  it does not. You make the mistake with your science and jump to conclusions which then allow you to assume.

That is the problem with your science.

That has been stated in many forums. Usually when you post your links. I think you need to read the replies to your posts a little better.

The evidence and proof expressed here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380,
show the step-by-step process whereby God can be proven to exist. This is not my science, except that I acknowledge it. This is standard, fundamental science fact that can be found in virtually all the libraries in America, and in thousands of websites around the world.

So far, you haven't shown a step-by-step process of rebuttal. You probably don't have such a process, even in mind. This means that you are unwilling to accept science fact. And that's okay. Your religion is simply similar to that of many other atheists who do the same.

As far as statements in forums, anybody can make statements. Go to any church and listen to the sermon. Statements all over the place. Tis the same with the atheism religion, except that the atheism statements are often made from the lectern rather than the pulpit.

If replies to my posts were anything that had substance, rather than the simple political talk, talk, talk that they are, you might have some scientifically factual rebuttal to the proof that God exists.

Cool

But BADecker your posts are biblical talk talk talk with no sense.

They start off making sense then you make assumptions and they go nowhere.

I actually found your arguments to hold sense "originally" but now you have been rebutted and all you do is repeat the same nonsense which has been disproved.

Then when you have no more arguments you bring out your same old posts that you yourself wrote.

You are in a crazed cycle of denial.

I recommend anyone to read your posts and they will see the falsehood of your claims.

Not all my posts are biblical talk. Nothing in the proof for the existence of God, as listed in the above links, is Biblical talk. It is science fact talk. However, there's tons of information in the Bible that make the best sense of anything.

The only rebuttal to the proof that God exists, is the rebuttal of political science. Political science is simply a science of attempting to out-talk someone else. It includes lies. We are talking political science in many things that we talk. But, anyone who goes to the above links and looks for proof that God exists, will find such proof. This includes you, even though you keep on talking political science in the form of lying about what you have found.

Hey, and thanks again for helping to confirm the proofs for the existence of God, by not even showing one rebuttal, but simply saying that you have shown rebuttal.

Cool

Just a quick rebuttal for illustration point:

Psalm 18:30 states "As for God, his way is perfect"

Matthew 5:48 "You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect".

Genesis 1:27  "So God created mankind in his own image"

So after reading this, you can see that the christian bible believes their god to be perfect, and man was made in his image which correlates to man being perfect.

The problem with this is...... man is not perfect. We are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and with age our bodies and minds break down. Our poorly-made spines, inflexible knees, and pelvic bones make childbirth difficult.

So, if man is not perfect, then neither is your god, so the words of your god are false, or, he does not exist.

Another religion facet of disproving gods...... Science is slowly providing the answers to questions which were once believed to be the result off a god/s. The Greeks used Poseidon to explain how earthquakes happen, which we now know is due to the movement of tectonic plates to relieve pressure.


Perhaps you are not human. If you are not, if you are an angel of God, then maybe you are perfect.

If you are human, your logic is imperfect.


God gave mankind perfection in the Garden of Eden. Mankind could do no better than perfection. But, like the curious people we are, our first parents threw that perfection away intentionally.

So, you are wrong, because you are living in imperfection, and your words are your own. But I am right, because even though I am living in imperfection like you, I am simply referring to the perfect Word of God in my explanation.

And tectonic plate movement is due to cause and effect of all kinds of things... cause and effect that God set in place.

When are you going to stop being so dense, intentionally. You enjoy the imperfection. You revel in it. At least I am trying to move towards perfection.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 28, 2017, 02:05:18 AM

And science fact expresses some of the world we live in. That same science fact proves God exists.

Cool

No  it does not. You make the mistake with your science and jump to conclusions which then allow you to assume.

That is the problem with your science.

That has been stated in many forums. Usually when you post your links. I think you need to read the replies to your posts a little better.

The evidence and proof expressed here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380,
show the step-by-step process whereby God can be proven to exist. This is not my science, except that I acknowledge it. This is standard, fundamental science fact that can be found in virtually all the libraries in America, and in thousands of websites around the world.

So far, you haven't shown a step-by-step process of rebuttal. You probably don't have such a process, even in mind. This means that you are unwilling to accept science fact. And that's okay. Your religion is simply similar to that of many other atheists who do the same.

As far as statements in forums, anybody can make statements. Go to any church and listen to the sermon. Statements all over the place. Tis the same with the atheism religion, except that the atheism statements are often made from the lectern rather than the pulpit.

If replies to my posts were anything that had substance, rather than the simple political talk, talk, talk that they are, you might have some scientifically factual rebuttal to the proof that God exists.

Cool

But BADecker your posts are biblical talk talk talk with no sense.

They start off making sense then you make assumptions and they go nowhere.

I actually found your arguments to hold sense "originally" but now you have been rebutted and all you do is repeat the same nonsense which has been disproved.

Then when you have no more arguments you bring out your same old posts that you yourself wrote.

You are in a crazed cycle of denial.

I recommend anyone to read your posts and they will see the falsehood of your claims.

Not all my posts are biblical talk. Nothing in the proof for the existence of God, as listed in the above links, is Biblical talk. It is science fact talk. However, there's tons of information in the Bible that make the best sense of anything.

The only rebuttal to the proof that God exists, is the rebuttal of political science. Political science is simply a science of attempting to out-talk someone else. It includes lies. We are talking political science in many things that we talk. But, anyone who goes to the above links and looks for proof that God exists, will find such proof. This includes you, even though you keep on talking political science in the form of lying about what you have found.

Hey, and thanks again for helping to confirm the proofs for the existence of God, by not even showing one rebuttal, but simply saying that you have shown rebuttal.

Cool

Just a quick rebuttal for illustration point:

Psalm 18:30 states "As for God, his way is perfect"

Matthew 5:48 "You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect".

Genesis 1:27  "So God created mankind in his own image"

So after reading this, you can see that the christian bible believes their god to be perfect, and man was made in his image which correlates to man being perfect.

The problem with this is...... man is not perfect. We are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and with age our bodies and minds break down. Our poorly-made spines, inflexible knees, and pelvic bones make childbirth difficult.

So, if man is not perfect, then neither is your god, so the words of your god are false, or, he does not exist.

Another religion facet of disproving gods...... Science is slowly providing the answers to questions which were once believed to be the result off a god/s. The Greeks used Poseidon to explain how earthquakes happen, which we now know is due to the movement of tectonic plates to relieve pressure.

legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 27, 2017, 05:53:13 PM
I'm sure that no God exists. All the evidence is just a statement. If the secrets of magic tricks Copperfield did not disclose it would be possible also to say that he is God.

The question is, who is right? The person who simply thinks God doesn't exist, or the person who accepts the proofs that science and nature show that God DOES exist?

Cool
Human who saw it is talking about, but at the same time it for yourself. For example, I still can not believe until you will not see himself. So this is probably common to all people of my character.

Nature shows us that God must exist. How? Because nature is like a machine that nobody else could make.

There are lots of things you do not see, yet you believe them to be true. Why not God, Whose nature you see all around you?

Cool
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
February 27, 2017, 05:31:27 PM
I'm sure that no God exists. All the evidence is just a statement. If the secrets of magic tricks Copperfield did not disclose it would be possible also to say that he is God.

The question is, who is right? The person who simply thinks God doesn't exist, or the person who accepts the proofs that science and nature show that God DOES exist?

Cool
Human who saw it is talking about, but at the same time it for yourself. For example, I still can not believe until you will not see himself. So this is probably common to all people of my character.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 27, 2017, 05:05:13 PM
recently i seriously started to consider that the universe itself is inteligent in the way it responds to you via people and environment, it would mean that we live in some kind of a simluation like a video game which generates itself in vastly speed, a proof for that is that the deeper u look into something to more infinite information about it is beeing created. for example if u look with a teleskope into the universe or if u look with a microscope into the matter itself new things are beeing created.

This is good thinking. But consider...

Entropy shows that there was a beginning. If there wasn't, everything would have dispersed and diffused into simplicity away from complexity long ago... because of entropy.

Also, cause and effect shows that everything is the effect of one or more causes. At the same time, there is nothing that we even have a hint of that could have caused the complexity after so many years of cause and effect. After all, especially in entropy, things start to become simpler after cause and effect happens to them over and over. They don't remain complex.

The point? The universe was started by Something very great and full of knowledge and power, outside of the universe, because there is no evidence of it within the universe. The universe is not old, but young, because if it were old, the complexity would have been reduce a lot further by entropy.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
February 27, 2017, 04:55:01 PM
recently i seriously started to consider that the universe itself is inteligent in the way it responds to you via people and environment, it would mean that we live in some kind of a simluation like a video game which generates itself in vastly speed, a proof for that is that the deeper u look into something to more infinite information about it is beeing created. for example if u look with a teleskope into the universe or if u look with a microscope into the matter itself new things are beeing created.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
February 27, 2017, 02:42:12 PM
I'm sure that no God exists. All the evidence is just a statement. If the secrets of magic tricks Copperfield did not disclose it would be possible also to say that he is God.

The question is, who is right? The person who simply thinks God doesn't exist, or the person who accepts the proofs that science and nature show that God DOES exist?



I accept the proof that science and nature show that homo sapiens exist. "God" is just a word - an extremely significant word, loaded with twisted meaning almost beyond any other, that points to the (among a myriad of other things) absolute good homo sapiens desire, especially in light of the status quo of living in a world not having what we desire.



"God" is just a word. It is a rather simple, 3-letter word. Our definition of "God" shows that this word fits the Being that created and made the universe.

Of course, people can make any definition for any word that they want. But the sense of the word "God" in the dictionary definitions, fits the "Guy" Who made and created the universe.

So, thanks for promoting God by your post.

Cool
Jump to: