Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 85. (Read 6918 times)
Ratings are not always right. But I believe that if the project is added to various rating sites, then it is less likely that it will be fraudulent. Although this in my experience happened.
At first I trusted the ICO rating for the problem of choosing the project I was going to follow but in fact the rating was so high it was not good enough in the sale of its tokens, and from then on I do not believe anymore with the ICO rating because all can be in the manipulation of the ratings they provide, they may pay to include a high rating because I feel they will not be neutral in appraising an ICO, so it all comes back to the concept of a project if it is good and the good rating is clearly balanced.
Last time I made a ico decision based on ico ratings, I got burnt big time. Its not like they are wrong all the time, I just feel one shouldn't base all your decision making on the ratings and review from 2 or 3 people at the website. They remind me of football pundits who analyse and make predictions on live TV. They are not always right.
For others maybe they consider the rating of a particular ICO as an added factor but for me, I am not that dependent on those sites, I do my own research and it's just an instinct whether I would participate in that ICO or not. After all, you can not blame those rating sites if your investments failed.
Thanks to the author for the post.Long thought over this question.Never when choosing an ICO did not pay attention to the rating. What they,the experts, guided the evaluation?I'm an expert like them.)who needs to turn shall put assessment of!)cheap! pensioners discount!
in my view and articles which i have read icorating.com is one of the best site in ico rating analysis ico companies and ico investors and even nasdaq too impressed with their services
no, i don't believe with any ICO ratings site
i believe with my personal review and research to any ICO project mate
and i will invest or buy an ICO with my own predictions
i believe with my personal review and research to any ICO project mate
and i will invest or buy an ICO with my own predictions
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
not only from the ICO rating ,, I do not believe it if I just look at it. I'd rather look at the websites, roadmaps and the project community. Successful ICO depends not only on the rating on a website, even if it's a popular website. because in a project everything is possible. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Of course i do if i dont belive
I dont unter on this
I dont unter on this
No I do not believe. I trust, only my personal analysis of projects and experience. Ratings can be corrupt, so they can not be trusted.
Definitely yes. I use their ratings before doing my personal research on icos I want to invest in.
Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.
I had tables with ratings and comments from different gurus. But in fact, with a table with twenty ico there are only two that are not scam. You must look at the team yourself and what kind of product the project offers.
it could be a reference for you more trust in ICO, but I suggest it to check again ICO coin website is.
if it reaches softcap it may still be good, but it will be even better when ICO reach Hardcap.
and look at the network she's wearing, whether she's using the Ethereum network or not, if my Ethereum network is confident and more trusting when she creates her own network.
Yeah, its your money so basically this ico reviews has nothing to do if the ico is really realistic and reasonable to trust at the end of the day they are only a guide and reference for your research before investing, its your money and if you scammed because of their reviews you cannot blame them. if it reaches softcap it may still be good, but it will be even better when ICO reach Hardcap.
and look at the network she's wearing, whether she's using the Ethereum network or not, if my Ethereum network is confident and more trusting when she creates her own network.
it could be a reference for you more trust in ICO, but I suggest it to check again ICO coin website is.
if it reaches softcap it may still be good, but it will be even better when ICO reach Hardcap.
and look at the network she's wearing, whether she's using the Ethereum network or not, if my Ethereum network is confident and more trusting when she creates her own network.
if it reaches softcap it may still be good, but it will be even better when ICO reach Hardcap.
and look at the network she's wearing, whether she's using the Ethereum network or not, if my Ethereum network is confident and more trusting when she creates her own network.
maybe hard to say. your opinion is right and i agree with you. ICO have rating not good can be release on market even ICO have a great rating is not even come out on market. maybe in my opinion the ICO ratings just tell us about how good they team they product so its depend on us to believe or not.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website.
I don't trust ICO ratings that much. I prefer to choose the ICO independently by studying their team, white paper and another public docs , their web resources.
There was project that i watch for a while and they got some avarage points on a popular ico rating website. After a while those reviews changed to positive for no reason. So, i am not trusting them but they are good place for quick review.
Personally, my opinion does not make sense to make such ratings ICO projects, because all the ratings on many sites are only informational. You can make a rating of already passed ICO based on the amount of funds collected. This information can be useful for investors who want to buy tokens of a promising project on the exchange.
I do check out ICO ratings for ICOs and also check out their team, websites, whitepaper and other stuff to determine the potential of an ICO, there are a lot of ICO are coming into market and most of them fails to reach soft cap. It's better to do proper research before investing.
Jump to: