Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 84. (Read 6918 times)
Ratings are just guides that gives you information, It will depend also to the ICO you're investing in. You may believe and trust ICO rating but you can't blame it if it's not accurate because it's up to you if you will invest your money.
For 100 percent I do not believe in any ratings and not a single review. In any case, every project and its team is studied in detail by myself and if I like the project and the high rating only then I make a decision about investing.
Usually I don't trust such websites with ICO rating, because in most cases they are get paid for this. But there's one recourse icodrops.com which proved to be very reliable. And most of there rating are based on there own investigations. I think this is the best ICO recourse now.
Yes, many ICO rating websites have been paid by project owners for their projects to achieve a high score on the ICO rating website. I think the best way is for every investor to self-study and self-analysis from the perspective of each person
I do not really know that because I did not read icoratings and icobench looking for some ico's because I don't think that they provide ico it will legit and successful so I really appreciated their beliefs to those ico that really matter but I don't really base my expectations to those site. 
For me ICO Ratings is a good guide that we can check if an ICO is good to invest or not, its still best to make our own research and dig more deeper with the project and team before we invest because no matter how big the ratings are if they want to scam us we can't do anything about it.
I like those pages too. They help me find my way around ico jungle.
There i find information about icos bundled.
There i find information about icos bundled.
Yes, I believe that at the same time I am also very dependent on the ICO rating. I think it can help me to filter out some fraud.
I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
Actually ill did not totally trusted in ICO rating but this will be can get some investor to invest on this project because the ICO rating was in high rate. But not all in the high in rate are in the token sold out, But we need time to research also on the project if we need to invest in a project. So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
Yeah i believe in Icos Rating ! Need to Icos Will increase there rating you need to spread and to share what is Icos doing or a great happen when Icos Start !! To get your ICOs rating will increases more and more!!
These websites are just my beginings of research but they dont affect if i am investing or not.There are so many wrong or payed reviews so always DYOR before you invest
No. Would never believe such rating from other people. I would rather do my own research.
They rate it by their own basis, we all have that kind of mind just like they do. It is just that they have a website to tell it and we dont.
Well we could at least share it in this forum though.
Somehow their ratings gives some impact to new players. It is not good if they give bad ones and then suddenly it will be a success.
They rate it by their own basis, we all have that kind of mind just like they do. It is just that they have a website to tell it and we dont.
Well we could at least share it in this forum though.
Somehow their ratings gives some impact to new players. It is not good if they give bad ones and then suddenly it will be a success.
yes of course because of that ranking we can see the potential altcoin done in sales transactions on the ico. after that we can also get the latest information in an ico that is always fast in providing info. and in the presence of this we can easily see the potential of an altcoin.
Truly, I trust in some ICO rating . There is a notable technique for ICO contributing: do your own examination. In the earlier year once I've been requested to help one ICO to send some messages to various ICO related sites (counting postings) and I've found that an entirely enormous piece of the ICO evaluations are expect installments to get your undertaking recorded on their site. That comes especialy about the neighborhood sites. The mail nesson was that ICO appraisals can never be 100% trusted. Ofcourse they may demonstrate the grneral buildup around the coin however you ought to dependably make your own particular research.
yes, because I think ICO rating determines the quality of the ICO.
Somehow yes. But I don't rely with ICO ratings that much because it can be a paid advertisement. We never know. So if I am going to invest in a certain ICO, I won't rely on what other people say. I will do my own research to study that ICO before I invest.
Lot of ICO rating website recently are begining to turn to cheat, most are now being paid to rate, reason why you see that most of there rating are always on the high/positive , I use them as referenc and do my own personal research before investing, else you can be mislead by there judgement.
Yup your idea was right I also notice that most ico rating website provide a high rating even the project have no real intention to create a real product meaning the website are bias and being paid by ico project. It always okay to trust your own analysis/ research and dont based on any ico rating website.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
If you leave out the marketability of the token right after the ICO, then I do trust these ratings. ICO ratings are irrelevant to the after pre-sale statistics of the token. ICO ratings rate the overall smoothness and legitimacy of the ICO and not the marketing and value of the token.
Lot of ICO rating website recently are begining to turn to cheat, most are now being paid to rate, reason why you see that most of there rating are always on the high/positive , I use them as referenc and do my own personal research before investing, else you can be mislead by there judgement.
Well, if it is a rating from a trusted platform - yes. I prefer to check everything at icodrops com.
Despite to the fact that some websites are not trustworthy, there exist some good website that rate ICOs. I use these websites to have a general thought about projects and experts opinions are very useful I think.
Jump to: