Topic: Do you blame someone for your gambling losses? - page 29. (Read 6130 times)

To be sincere, you can't just conclude, such isn't as simple as you think, there is a situation, something I personally have experienced before, this was before I started gambling myself, a friend of mine who was already an addicted gambler at the time, probably wanted to bet on a game but had no money, and he didn't want to borrow either, he approached me and told me to bet on the game with my money, I wasn't really interested but he cajoled me with sweet talks promising I would win the bet, that's its a sure game, I still wasn't interested but he dragged me, and at the end, I followed him and we placed the bet, he was probably hoping that I will win the bet, then we can share the money 50/50, but unfortunately for him, the bet was lost, I lost my money, I wanted to hold him to pay me back the money lost but changed my mind as at the time, I didn't want to have issues with any body, I wasnt just in the mood to make troubles, so I just let it slide..

Now, consider such scenario and tell me if or not it's wrong to blame such a person for the loss.

Yes, things have been seen in casinos when they do not agree with the results of some players and their claims are not given importance because it has been detected that they only want to get money from them in a bad way , with cheats or making threads of accusation of fraud , among others , it can clearly be said that a casino that has such a reputation and trust will not go bad with little money , in fact , with little money they will not try to get i t, the plays are protected in Blockchain and there is All data on how the person played and how their Results Fared , there are some Casinos that have more Security because they Carry out audit Processes.


We must also highlight that there are some players with a lot of programming skills who, when they find a vulnerability in the casino, do not report it and prefer to exploit it and get money, but sometimes this happens because casinos do not give importance to these They don't even reward problems, if casinos make vulnerability reporting policies very well paid, I think many people would report and make the casino stronger, but the rewards must be high, because no one for 100 usd will dare to do it, I think a good reward is around 2000usd and up, which is much better to give 2000usd and up than to lose $20k thanks to an exploit.

Yeah, it's always a more reasonable thing to simply change yourself, instead of blaming the rest of the world for things that happen to you.

You can't really change other people, or at least it's very difficult, whereas you can change yourself, that's usually the easiest way.

Totally get you, dude! This mental playground we're treading is mad interesting. When you're rolling with the betting bunch, you're in for a wild ride with danger and doubt as your wingmen. Here, each choice is like playing seesaw between the juicy jackpot and the crazy cliffhanger.

A pro-risk taker knows the game's not just about tossing coins. They get the whole shebang – homework is the key before a big roll, and advice is just that – advice! It's gotta go through a thorough inspection, even if it comes from your homeboy, and then seen through the glasses of their own brainwork.

When your pal's two cents sway a gambler, remember, the last call to jump or stay lies with the risk-taker. If the bet nosedives, yeah, that sucks, but that's how the dice rolls in the bet biz. The stakes are sky-high, and so is the onus for each call you make.

It's a crazy act to blame someone if a person haven't done anything wrong. But in the scenario you gave that a person who is easily influenced switched his bet, I think it's still on the person who bet and not on the person who influenced him. The one who influenced the gambler to switch bet has still a part on blame but the actual blame should be on the gambler who can fully control his bet. I'm sure that the a bettor is doing his research before betting on his bet but there are people who can see more than them and giving some key takes to the bettor that can change his bet. In my point of view, The friend who influenced him has researched more and see a higher chance of winning on the opposing team but yeah this is still a gamble and a sure win is impossible.

It's unethical, but really common nowadays to see gamblers blaming others for their losses, especially the platform where they are playing. The most common excuse is to say the house is cheating on them, although they accept playing aware about the fact the algorithm was designed to give the house a slight advantage over gamblers on long term. So it's stated by the rules which are clear to everyone who makes a fast research about it on Google.

The negative consequences of gamblers who can't take responsability for their own acts is that it leads to censorship or strict regulations from authorities, consequently prejudicing every gamblers around, including those who have a healthy gambling routine.

It's unethical to blame other people while he plays it himself, so it's very rare in my opinion to blame others but for annoyance and emotion then it will be felt alone and even have an effect on other people because he didn't talk before or get together again after a big loss, and that is usually what happens to gamblers.

Whatever is played in gambling is your own responsibility and you can't blame other people just because of other advice or criticism, we decide, of course we are ready for everything, unless you supervise your own child not to get involved in gambling then it will still be our responsibility.

Well am not going against you or anything but I strongly the final decision which you claim is the hands of the person wanting to place  the bet can still be influence by one or two advice from people or friends around him. I have come across many cases where people actually plan in placing a bet on a team they strongly believe will win the game but that thought was later influence by another friend and if the person is someone who is easily influence, he will definitely change or have a different thought towards that particular game he wants to play.

Yes mate it's really funny because gambler gambling with his own money and he will bear the profit and loss for himself so why a gamblers blame other? If my friends give me any advice on gambling, I must research that advice or suggestion properly. If their suggestion matches with my strategy or decision, I will accept their advice, otherwise I will reject. But even though these things are known to many people, they often gamble emotionally. For which the gambler is entirely responsible. But that responsibility should never be placed on others.

It seems that it will be very funny when you lose and you blame other people or your friends, because basically when you gamble, of course you have your own choice. So, even if for example other people or your friends tell you about the bet to be made but still, the final decision is yours. So, when you win or lose at gambling, you can't blame other people or your friends, because the bet you make is your own choice so you can't blame anyone.

this usually happens to gamblers who only think of gambling as a place to generate income or even gambler addicts. because these two have the same thoughts so that when they lose at gambling they will blame the casino or the provider and in fact cases like this are true that gamblers must have full control over the responsibility of the money used to gamble so that when they get successive losses they don't think scammed by the casino.
it's honestly a little ridiculous to see a gambler lose a few times and run out of money but talk loudly and accuse the casino of scamming him but without any proof.

Maybe we don't know how, but a hacker is much smarter and has many ways to hack whatever he wants.
But there are several factors that make it easier for hackers to carry out their actions as I have stated before.
Maybe with caution and also always maintaining security can further minimize hacking actions.
But unfortunately hackers are far ahead of us so we can only try our best to avoid being hacked.

Gambling players should be aware of what they have done. It would be stupid decision to blame provider, when he loss. If he can't prove the provider is cheating, then he won't get anything. Players like this are players who are not mentally ready to play gambling. They think gambling will bring a lot of money, but they are not ready to accept every loss. I think, the more he tells that the provider is cheating but can't prove it, and he can only prove that he has lost in a row history, then more people will laugh at him and say he was crazy because lose in gambling. However, when he loses it's not the provider's responsibility anymore, but his own responsibility for the money.

There should be no one to blame here, one is betting on one's own volition, there is no second or third-party involvement and it is an individual decision for everyone. Healthy gamblers are those who are able to take responsibility for whatever results they will get, therefore the money factor that is used as a bet also greatly influences a person's psychology when gambling. Get used to gambling with cold money, meaning that with money you are ready to lose. It is a gamble where one will win if luck comes his way but the problem is that most people always think that they can be one of the lucky ones among the rest and the cycle will continue until they realize that they have lost it all. And finally, if luck wants to always come, then the only way is for them to become a dealer.

A person who tends to blame the casino for their losses should not gamble in the first place because they can't even take the blame for them losing their own money in gambling, such people are so extremely irritating and has useless natures, having a person like that around you makes you want to fight with them because they do things that you don't like at all.

I don't think that a casino would really care if a person blames them after losing money because they probably know that their claims have no value and even if they try and sue them for it, no one will really give any importance to what they say.

The thing that boggles me is on the time that how these people wasnt able to detect or notice it out that there are some unauthorized transactions made on their account until it did become big and something significant before they do make out some complaint? We know that in every transactions on your credit card or even debit would really be giving out that text notification which its impossible that its just that too late
before they file some complaint. We dont know whats the actual deal whether the hacking is really that real or just some alibi just because they had spend out their credit on playing on gambling
and just pretending that they didnt know?

We know that we do have lots of moduses on which people would be able to do as long it could benefit them out. As for general speaking about blaming your losses into someone
is something not that right. Its your responsibility and would really be facing up on whatever things or consequences lies ahead.

Yeah, that's the story and it's sad to see that such people are using the law to get away from their problem and I do believe they are successful in doing it.
From millions to just a hundred thousand that needs to be paid back, I say it's a win for the gamblers here but on the wrong way.
Abuse of the law.
Indeed some psychological help is needed for these people and if proven that they are not in the right mental state, perhaps they could put them in the right facility to extend the rehabilitation. It will be difficult to just leave them walking with society because if they can bend the law against a big business what else worst thing they can do against individual people who they will borrow money from?
Gambling addiction is such a mess because it requires tons of money, and the expensive attribute of it may be worst than drugs and alcohol problems because of the continuous money-spending habit.

Yeah, it all depends on how the system was exposed though.

I have no idea about the specifics of this case, but I think in most cases people just use weak passwords or leave accounts logged on, etc. Basic security is not done in many cases, so it could be something like that.

On the other hand it could have been a more sophisticated attack, in which even the latest security wouldn't work.

Yes in the case of hacking the real culprit was a gambler who was negligent of his online status and also the password he created.
Many gamblers are careless so they don't think about the consequences of their mistakes, maybe they just consider it a trivial thing, but in any gambling there is accountability so that in acting you must always be careful.

A crime or criminal act such as hacking can occur because of an opportunity and if the gambler gives this opportunity then everything is finished because the hacker can do whatever he wants.

I think that a human being when he can do something like admitting his own mistakes is growing widely, it is not a bad thing to point out that we as players have more mistakes than hits, it is normal, as in trading things can happen in different ways just when we can see it in different ways, first if someone is blamed for our mistakes in the casino it is as a way of being able to take away the blame, but that will not return our money, the other way is , if the casino is blamed for wanting to " stealing from us" would remove all responsibility and make anything always blame the casino, that's something that is very bad, but there are people who do it and they are People who start to make a problem out of Everything they see.