Topic: Do you have a gun? - page 41. (Read 13934 times)
I dont have a gun because when im easly get mad and out of control so my family dont letting me to handle any kinds of weapon but the gun is for safety i said
No, I do not have weapons and in our country the sale of weapons is prohibited. I think that this is right, because many people will want to have fun with weapons or commit a crime.
I don't have a gun and my country bans private gun sales. I also don't like gun, if guys suffer from paranoia or delusions, or they're just a reckless idiot in general, then an armed them is more of a danger to innocent bystanders than an armed criminal.
Don't have one don't need one. We have rarely criminal acts in combination with guns, so I guess it is peaceful where I live!
Not allowed in my country, we are peaceful people here. I can't imagine having weapons everywhere you go.
firearms are good for use in countries where crimes are common, firearms are used to protect themselves from criminals, but in my country firearms should not be used except members of the military.
No I do not have gun. Gun is a dangerous thing, not everyone can have gun. Only certain people like the police can have it. There will be a lot of gun abuse if gun ownership is released For everyone.
This question mostly goes to americans (or residents of any other country where it is legal).
Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
Maybe if you become an American citizen, with the crime rate no 1 in the world lets you have firearms.Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
#1's Brazil, actually (US #4):
http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/11-countries-with-the-highest-crime-rate-per-capita-in-the-world-2016-rankings-466275/?singlepage=1
This question mostly goes to americans (or residents of any other country where it is legal).
Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
Maybe if you become an American citizen, with the crime rate no 1 in the world lets you have firearms.Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
Because it is useful to keep yourself, when this robbery is very helpful for you to take care of yourself.
Indeed when you have a weapon you must have permission to have it, but not a few of those who have it without permission.
if it works to keep yourself, no problem.
I do not think that building a private army and civil war is a danger. It seems to me that crime is more dangerous.
You can't build a private army with civilians armed with hunting rifles and pistols. You need military trainers and advanced equipment for that. So I would say that the chances of someone forming a private army using these small arms is quite low.
Good thing active & off-duty military always has the threat of mutiny standing in the way of orders to genocide their own friends & families.
Retired military - disciplined people. Young criminals are much more dangerous
the big problem, at least in my country, if you shoot thief for by self defence there is a big chance that you end in jail. The laws here are very shitty in that matter.
I do not think that building a private army and civil war is a danger. It seems to me that crime is more dangerous.
You can't build a private army with civilians armed with hunting rifles and pistols. You need military trainers and advanced equipment for that. So I would say that the chances of someone forming a private army using these small arms is quite low.
Good thing active & off-duty military always has the threat of mutiny standing in the way of orders to genocide their own friends & families.
I do not think that building a private army and civil war is a danger. It seems to me that crime is more dangerous.
You can't build a private army with civilians armed with hunting rifles and pistols. You need military trainers and advanced equipment for that. So I would say that the chances of someone forming a private army using these small arms is quite low.
I don't have a gun. Owning a gun is risky and expensive.. No need to have it because we are fully secured in our place.. Somebody owns a gun might say, for protection against threat.. case to case basis , might be their passion but lets put in our minds that abused using on it may took you in trouble..
This question mostly goes to americans (or residents of any other country where it is legal).
Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
I don't have a gun and don't plan on getting one soon and if ever as I think that there would not be any need for me to purchase a gun as it is not neccessary. However I do believe that in some cases that it is needed and that it is required. However I strongly oppose arming civillians as it might cause them to take matters into their own hands and it would be catastrophic as you are giving them the right to build a private army and make a civil war.
I do not think that building a private army and civil war is a danger. It seems to me that crime is more dangerous.
This question mostly goes to americans (or residents of any other country where it is legal).
Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
Do you have any firearms? For what purpose do you have it and have you ever used it?
Everyone else can discuss if people should have a right to have a gun or not.
I don't have a gun and don't plan on getting one soon and if ever as I think that there would not be any need for me to purchase a gun as it is not neccessary. However I do believe that in some cases that it is needed and that it is required. However I strongly oppose arming civillians as it might cause them to take matters into their own hands and it would be catastrophic as you are giving them the right to build a private army and make a civil war.
No. In my country, people want to own guns so they can scare people. They use it to act like they run around things in their place. Guns are only used for violence and not for the protection of their own so police and authorities should only be the ones to own it.
So if someone is trying to kill you or your friends you think you can't protect yourself aganist any threat? The fact is that police is not efficient and I dont think that someone else knows better than me how to protect me and my property.
Here is some numbers.
http://imgur.com/5eAHTAf
guns can protect but also can be abuse by those people who don't know how to respect others and many cases guns has been use to hurt or
kill innocents.
No. In my country, people want to own guns so they can scare people. They use it to act like they run around things in their place. Guns are only used for violence and not for the protection of their own so police and authorities should only be the ones to own it.
So if someone is trying to kill you or your friends you think you can't protect yourself aganist any threat? The fact is that police is not efficient and I dont think that someone else knows better than me how to protect me and my property.
Here is some numbers.
http://imgur.com/5eAHTAf
I don't have a gun though carrying a gun is legal here but when it goes to the times of election, there's a gun ban.
In my country, you can not have weapons, so I do not have a gun. But crimes are committed with illegal weapons and one has only to wait when we will be allowed to defend ourselves with weapons.
Jump to: