Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 35. (Read 9148 times)
I participated in about in some bounty campaigns with high evaluations. After the finish of ICO, the tokens dependably cost substantially less than their ostensible esteem. Financial specialists have dependably been at a misfortune. Accordingly, appraisals can not shield you from misfortunes at all.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
That's why I don't trust ICO ratings and any youtube crypto guru. If some ICO get my attention, I read every letter on every page on their web site, wp, forum and whatever they have! I believed everyone at start and lost a lot! With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Personally, I once trusted them. After all, who else to believe than them. Just sit smart people who know what is unknown to me.
As soon as began gets acquainted with cryptocurrency I trusted in the rating websites. But then understood that they lie and forge good marks to projects kotoryy to them paid.
Of course you do not need to believe these sites, because they will not give you anything good, I think that everything that today people have and all the experience that they have today can not be obtained with these sites in any way.
obviously we know airdropers and bounty hunters are giving fake points for the rating sites. Because project are rewarded people who gives good stakes to the project. Crypto world needs to find another way for rating and voting.
Before I will trust ICO rating sites, I will make sure that I do my own research, if my own research is inline with their own research, I will trust it, if not, I will go by now research findings, most of the ratings on these sites are paid ratings.
To everyone's misfortune, any rating site sells its ratings. If someone says that he doesn't do it, then someone from their team is engaged in it.
I don't invest in any ICO project without making my careful own research. I visit some ICO rating sites to help me find the most promising projects, but I don't trust them blindly, sometimes they mislead the potential investors. So always making the research personally is better.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
For me, ICO is very serious and everything related to ICO I treat with maximum caution.This also applies to rating sites, because apart from this I do not see a way to earn on ICO. The best search engine to filter out low-quality projects. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
ICO ratings is still one of the best basis if the ico is good and will have a good chance to be successful and we all know that when the ico have a higher ratings it has chance to be successful but investor should also consider if the ico have a good team.With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I dont realy trust ico rating sites,becose lot of scam projects going trough this rating charts most of all projects get 4,5 rating,and in my opinion need to trust self and do very serious investagation before u invest somthing..
To my mind, the best ICO rating sites are those which you can trust. it is better to check the rating of the project first before you get started, if you take the decision to join the project but later fail, the reason maybe its rating
Maybe for 50%, not more, all understand that they do most of things for money, including the listings, how fair can be such ratings?
I do not believe in any ratings. Very often in topics devoted to projects, you can see posts from representatives of a rating site that report that the rating has been assigned to the project and write a personal message to improve the rating. I think that you can buy a rating.
I trust only proven rating sites that once helped my friends or acquaintances. Now I have learned to share the sites that for the money PR projects and sites that are really trying to create a real rating that can help you choose a project for investment.
I always trusted earlier such websites with the ratings of ICO projects, but over time I have changed the opinion on them. I began to notice often that the rating doesn't reflect reality in these websites. I met projects with bad ratings, but they made big profit for investors.
Not really trust, because a lot of purchased experts especially I heard it often happens on icobench
I have not had good experiences with these sites, most of them accept bribes to improve the rating of an ICO, in my opinion, you should only take it as an overview of what the ICO is more or less about, and from there form your own opinion, to know if it is worth participating or not, because I have heard that they charge up to 10 ETH to give a positive review to someone, which is absurd.
Never and Ever trust those sites because most of the sites are rating by manually and they don't research and just put a rating for money I have seen the article on steam. If any ICO spends money They will get the 4.7++ rating DO you own research and don't depend on others rating.
Jump to: