Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 32. (Read 9148 times)
I'm not sure about the ICO ranking site, but I can use all the sites and compare them, this is very difficult but I will try to see what the difference is from other ICO websites. You also have to have your own experience to predict whether the ICO is good or not by looking Team from the project
Of course not because most of it are over-rated or paid reviews to get readers attention ! Much better to do your own research when it comes to investment ! ICO Projects are good but most of them are scam so be careful ! I can give you one of my ICO right now which is the Gemstra , the most innovative retail marketplace for social selling that will run on a decentralize blockchain to connect brands and sellers in a single community to perform transaction with a transparent and fair community that will benefited all users !
It is not advisable to rely on third-party sites to decide if it is a good idea to spend your money or not in a highly volatile environment like this, it is best to do a old school manual review, in the end, many ICOs review sites charge a percentage to give a good review.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
If you don't trust rating ICO ,then you must do your own research about this ICO , you can review their team ,their produk and their choice to grow up when already listed on market .but be careful to chose ICO because many ICO is SCAM
I do not. I have seen some of these ICOs with 5 star ratings fail or become really shitty projects at the end of the day or ICOs with 1 or 2 star ratings that do well at the end of the day. I do not know how they do some of the ratings, but it just doesn't work for me. I rather carry out my own analysis on an ICO.
Yes, I do trust ICO rating sites. One of the best ICO rating site is ICO bench because it has a complete details on the company and you can also filter ratings so you can choose good one and it has also bounty filter and you can choose great bounty projects.
I trust only some ICO rating sites, such sites help to systematize all the available information about the project, but you must carefully select rating sites, find out what reputation they have, because today there are some sites where you can find false information about ICO.
I think the ICO rating is not a good factor for identifying good ones but depends on what services are involved. If the site is special - they won't believe I'm not suggesting because I don't believe it
That i look around for projects on ICO listing sites, does not mean i choose projects based on their rating. If you do not do your own research, you might end up falling victim of scam project.
I trust these ratings, but I'm looking at the ICO benchmark. Always study the company, before investing. Also they make an intrinsic check to the team, ensuring safety and avoid possible ICO scams.
If you depend on ICO rating sites to choose the ICO to invest in, you f end f investing in a scam project, because not all ratings are genuine. If an ICO rating site is lunched newly, they might be sincerer at the very early stage, but as time goes on they might begin to compromise. It is always better for you to know how to analyse a project on your own, than depending on the analysis from another party.
Everywhere you can be deceived. You need to rely only on yourself and on your knowledge. Personally, I don't trust ratings, but I take them into account. I make a decision based on a thorough study of the project.
All of you correctly speak. Everyone has to rely only on himself, but not on others opinion. Especially we do not know people who speak on these websites.
Everywhere you can be deceived. You need to rely only on yourself and on your knowledge. Personally, I don't trust ratings, but I take them into account. I make a decision based on a thorough study of the project.
I think that ICO ratings sites can help to understand which project is worth taking part in. Sure that not all of them are trustworthy but I choose those which are really helpful and are at the reputable sites
In most of the cases I dont trust ICO rating websites or telegram channels anymore , because most thing in their is paid listing , Instead I always prefer do my own research mostly about the team and about the product or idea of the product.
Ofcourse , all sponsored and the ones on frontpage are paid listings . Not sure about paid KYC pass on review sites , but there is projects with team members passing kyc , but actually its fake .... Looks like everyone has a price
Well, I prefer to use some ICO rating websites once I am searching for a decent ico or bounty to participate in. however, I do not take it because of the final call. I solely use it as a part of my findings and that I still do a great deal of different personal evaluations before I finally decide that values my cash and time.
Don't trust any ICO rating site because They give a rating for money and There are so many evidence have. I found an article and it has all the details with conversations. Therefore don't trust anonymous rating. Believe your self and do your own research 
You should not rely on reytingova the websites when choosing the project for investment unambiguously. There it is possible only вcзять information about exactly what the project, its road map and stages of sale of tokens is. But all this can be found also on the website of the project. On it the rating websites are useless, are even to some extent harmful.
To be honest, I do not trust the rating that put ICO projects, I study the project itself, the team and the idea of well, and another inner voice prompts.
Jump to: