Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 37. (Read 9148 times)
Until now ICO rating sites proved to me that the information is correct so I don't see why I shouldn't trust them.
No, I don't trust anyone who tells me what to buy, so many times I was wrong when I listened to other people and community. The ratings can all be bought for money, never trust them.
before rating on the rating, but after 50 companies selected in this way, the majority turned out to be a scam. and companies with a low rating on the contrary went to the stock exchanges and collected money. The last straw was when I saw the price list of these sites and any shit can get different scores and positive comments from "experts"
Yes, it is true that a rating will not affect the results of a project. rating is also usually deceptive because of the fact that many website rating owners get a sum of money from various projects, they do a bribe to give a rating on a project. This is the real thing and happens to many ICO projects. The best thing we do is to analyze various data available in the project.What I usually do is to see who is in the team, when the person is a professional, I will immediately make the decision to invest in the project. I always see the track record because it is the most convincing reference.
I try not to trust the rating sites very much. Even top sites very often give a wrong forecast and people lose big money when trusted by sites. You need to think your head where to wet your money.
many of them are biased i think ,especiallly where you can buy the reviews openly for money....
Believe it or not, this is probably a very personal question, but I can find a lot of information on these sites which today can help in choosing projects that will be able to tell about the developers, probably they could help me in the correct analysis of the project.
no, i don't trust them at all, especially after the scandals (a lot of reviews are buyable etc)
My opinion, do not trust the rating sites. It is better to waste your time and choose a worthy project. In which the team's good responsiveness and so on.
before rating on the rating, but after 50 companies selected in this way, the majority turned out to be a scam. and companies with a low rating on the contrary went to the stock exchanges and collected money. The last straw was when I saw the price list of these sites and any shit can get different scores and positive comments from "experts"
For me, ICO sites also make business with crypto startups pay for their ratings go high.
Those review sites. How to make money. Will the evaluation fee for those items be charged? Is it advertising? We don't know. So, I don't really believe in this review site.
no, i don't trust at all, especially after the embarrassing ICO bench review buying
yes, it looks like ranking is one way to see whether the ICO is good or not. because most investors see from rank. and ratings given by investors. I personally also see ICO from rank, and then the response from the team. because when the team responds well. then investors will be happy to come to their projects, and real projects are investors' expectations.
Between yes and no. Because the ICO rating can at least filter out emerging ICO information. Although not 100% but a little trust.
When I want to invest, I first read the whitepaper and the web. After that I check who the team and advisor are behind the project. If the team and advisor behind the project are not fake and have experience in the crypto field, I will start investing in the project.
When I want to invest, I first read the whitepaper and the web. After that I check who the team and advisor are behind the project. If the team and advisor behind the project are not fake and have experience in the crypto field, I will start investing in the project.
I think the ICO site ranking does not provide an objective assessment they do not have a description of the assessments they do and certainly not good for reference. Because each cryptocurrancy project can buy ratings for ICOs on these sites. Many cases are related to this in cryptocurrancy. They specifically promote their projects.
I a straight word I say no because most sites collect money from the ICO company to rate them high. I hardly look at Ratings these days I just do my little research I can before taking part in any Project.
Rating sites are organizations that need to somehow earn their money, so anyone who uses the services of such sites as a rule should understand that this information can not always be reliable.
Depending on the case to evaluate trust ICO Rating sites. Because of the reputable developers as they develop ICOS campaigns are censored by the community and the index is good. But at the moment I'm a bit skeptical because there are so many bad campaigns that get high marks.
I do not advise you to trust such sites. They ratings are not objective, it is better to study the project yourself and make a decision. Almost all such sites are sponsored by different coins.
it could be a factor nonetheless, however then you may should give them a little credit. actually, i've lengthy suspected that these ICO score websites do now not simply do their tedious examine as to the actual credentials of the projects. Their scores will frequently depend upon what are readily available, just the fact that they may be to be had and now not whether or not they hold water or no longer. and then there is the fact that they also acquire undue price for a better score.
Jump to: