Topic: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) - page 35. (Read 19601 times)

how you explain ratings for NOT ACTUAL DEATH THREAT to a PROVEN SCAM COIN PROMOTER having 5 DT users negative rate me for "threatening" him which is flawed already then removing positive rating and getting owlcatz neg rate me because saying "jewishly expecting" ?
I really don't give a fucks about my negative ratings I just know I wont feel good till I see this circlejerk "dead" and that  counts for a lot more users that don't deserve any credit to their words.
This breaks my heart since 90% of tagged ratings are true but that doesn't exclude the power executed by this group to silence some users by either butthurtness or even getting paid to do so, and this group is so big that almost makes me lose faith in this forum.

How these delicate subjects always come up when im getting drunk and expected to talk shit.
Coincidences don't exist.

Ok, no red tag gang member, you are right at your logic he was making an highly complex move to manipulate the trust system by including you for 5 hours in his trust list. Genius !

Experimenting what smart-ass ? A cure for coronavirus ? Solving the string theory ?


Since he was outed as doing everything to manipulate the trust system and get into DT ,   does my explanation make any sense to you ?


Why is it always that red tagged people , no matter what simply back eachother up , regardless of logic ,   is there a dumbass private club , where you pledge your loyalty to one another ?

It even could be an experimental move, it was just for 5 hours. You are going with too much of conspiracy.

That'd be my guess. He did it with his other "enemies" too (Lauda, TMAN, et al), which makes no sense otherwise.

I think peloso is one of the 2-3 people here I took the time to add to my distrust list .    What I find "strange" is that he sent me a Pm , once he saw I distrusted him :
And a few minutes later he added me to his trust list ? for around 5 hours ?           Was that an attempt to make me remove him from my distrust list ? Like scratching eachother's backs ?

The best I can figure out from your illiterate rant is that you don't like the fact that I'm excluding you, because I don't really have any connection to the users you mentioned (Lauda, TMAN, LFC_Bitcoin). Take a look at your sent feedback and the games you're playing with your trust list, maybe that will give you a hint as to why your judgement can't be trusted.


Mixed signals

If any sort of "group" could destroy Bitcoin, it would deserve it. Bitcoin's strength is that it doesn't care what any "group" does.

Please stay (a bit) on topic

but you always supported and suport scums and morons like as cult of lauda
you rigt stop this shit but tru make it by yourself at first

I've never sent red trust for "deficient morals" so yeah it's quite pointless for you to keep making shit up like that.

You mean pieces of shit like you that form part of a group? I don't wan't go deeper into the subject since its pointless.
These groups destroy bitcoin.

you mean this users? 

TMAN
LFC_Bitcoin
 from my trust reference

There are some users who send red trust mostly for "deficient morals & judgement" and "pure evil" and other shit like that. What do you think about those?

I believe threads like this have helped turn the Default Trust experiment into a complete failure.

Admin should now understand that even some of the most experienced "veteran" members of this forum are not ready for a decentralized diverse form of meritocracy, and prefer a Red China style singular echo chamber instead where opinions deviating from the mainstream are quickly silenced and excluded, no matter how substantial or valuable they may be:


Number 1 & 2 have already been happening for years, that's why there is at least 20 threads in Reputation with the tag "Trust Abuse"...

The whole point of having 100+ DT members is to have a plurality of cultures and ideologies gaining representation in a forum that attempts to be libertarian in ideology, and it's the sign of a natural and free world that some of these members disagree with or even dislike each other.

Hundreds of very valuable and intelligent members have spoken up against bad practices by some deeply entrenched default trust members; if you try to motivate people into excluding them so that your precious friends can keep their trust sheets artificially clean, you are effectively devaluing the entire trust system of BTT, and that's why most people have stopped paying any attention to trust ratings because they understand in the vast majority of cases they are more based on political favoritism than justice or meritocracy.

I strongly urge future Bounty Campaigns to take a note of "safe echo-chamber formation" threads like this and stop giving a rat's ass about trust ratings on this forum, the Trust System has no meaningful purpose except for maybe warning the greenest of rookies about the most obvious of scams...

If you have an example of me using red trust inappropriately I'll review it. If you don't that's fine too.

It's not about you or your neutral ratings - I couldn't care less about that.

... Wait... you *want* me to ask you to review something???

Here comes another Neutral Trust Feedback on your wall that you're about to squeal about:


Want me to slap you down again?  Click quote or reply over yonder ---> ...

I read enough of that shit, fact that you all couldn't see I admited I would do something and never made a actual threat after countless times repeating it is a different thing.
Your circlejerk is obvious and so are your claims which are just pukable.

Please read the trust rating again and try to understand what it's for.


I won't. Pulling shit out of context and pretending to not understand jokes/sarcasm reflects poorly on you, not me. I'm sure I have said even more outrageous things so feel free to dig some more up.


I never said I don't give out red trust. I don't give out red trust for opinions, personal squabbles, being dumb, etc and I strongly suggest others refrain from doing so. Nice try twisting it into yet another pretzel. If you have an actual example of me using red trust inappropriately please let me know and I'll review it.

Hypocrite.

Next you'll be squealing about the neutral feedback left on your trust feedback wall:


Lead by example instead of slapping others with negative/DT distrust so you claim the martyr card that you don't give out red feedback trust.

Says the one that claims 180 days isn't enough ban over few drunk words.
Then contacting people to distrust me, negative rate and remove old positive ratings. (not saying you done this one yourself but you all one for me.)

Look at your buddy TMAN, hasn't touched the forum in two weeks out of butthurtness.