Pages:
Author

Topic: ★★★ EARN A WHOPPING 25% ON PROFITS - RitzGrandCasino.com ★★★ - page 25. (Read 71352 times)

hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?


Because they're not spamming. People get paid based on number of posts and you certainly don't expect members to spam the forum just to get paid high, do you?

No of course not.Spamming is not allowed in this program and also I don't like spamming.

I meant if a 'Member' status user signs up for the program and he gets 0.0005BTC per constructive post.So if he does 30 constructive posts daily that would make him 0.015BTC daily and 0.45BTC monthly.

Is there any 'Member' status user making this much?I mean it should be possible as the limit peer month is 3000 posts.

It's not impossible, you just have to be really active and constructive at the same time.  I'm trying to get to that point, but I can only muster 10-15 posts a day on average.   Embarrassed

I also think it depends on what boards your interested in, or the ones you like the most. For instance, I like to post in Off Topic, Services, Discussion, Goods, Lending, etc. But let's just say that if the Altcoin Announcement board interested somebody, they could easily get 20+ posts per day, non-spam.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?


Because they're not spamming. People get paid based on number of posts and you certainly don't expect members to spam the forum just to get paid high, do you?

No of course not.Spamming is not allowed in this program and also I don't like spamming.

I meant if a 'Member' status user signs up for the program and he gets 0.0005BTC per constructive post.So if he does 30 constructive posts daily that would make him 0.015BTC daily and 0.45BTC monthly.

Is there any 'Member' status user making this much?I mean it should be possible as the limit peer month is 3000 posts.

It's not impossible, you just have to be really active and constructive at the same time.  I'm trying to get to that point, but I can only muster 10-15 posts a day on average.   Embarrassed
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?


Because they're not spamming. People get paid based on number of posts and you certainly don't expect members to spam the forum just to get paid high, do you?

No of course not.Spamming is not allowed in this program and also I don't like spamming.

I meant if a 'Member' status user signs up for the program and he gets 0.0005BTC per constructive post.So if he does 30 constructive posts daily that would make him 0.015BTC daily and 0.45BTC monthly.

Is there any 'Member' status user making this much?I mean it should be possible as the limit peer month is 3000 posts.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1002
Joining your signature campaign.

Post count: 352

19CKigSnFcNtEyJihTGDqmerP8xF4DJTx6
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Just close your eyes and sign up for the highest paid and trusted signature program of the forum.
Yes, he really pays! Smiley I ve got two payments already and hope i will still participate and be part of this project. It is not only the highest paying offer for posting on this forum, but it is almost the highest paid sig camp at all at all forums they pay for posting.
BR,

Gondel

@Gondel May I know the other forum Ritz pay for posting ?

Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?



Basically you would have to post alot to get to that rate.  Also, it depends on your Member status

Quote
New rates for May. Starting on May 1st

Hero members, we will pay you:
0.0013 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Sr member,  we will pay you:
0.0011 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.
 
Full Members We will pay you:
0.0007 BTC Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Members We will pay you:
0.0005 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Obviously, the member that received over 1 BTC was a Hero member, but it can be done if you're diligent enough and post enough every day.

Equate (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/equate-111810) was a Sr. Member and received 0.001 BTC per post to reach 1 BTC. So, 1000 posts per month, which is quite reasonable...
sgk
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?


Because they're not spamming. People get paid based on number of posts and you certainly don't expect members to spam the forum just to get paid high, do you?
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?



Basically you would have to post alot to get to that rate.  Also, it depends on your Member status

Quote
New rates for May. Starting on May 1st

Hero members, we will pay you:
0.0013 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Sr member,  we will pay you:
0.0011 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.
 
Full Members We will pay you:
0.0007 BTC Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Members We will pay you:
0.0005 BTC  Per constructive post. 50 posts min per month.
NOT spam. NO rubbish posts (we do check)  max 3000 posts per month.

Obviously, the member that received over 1 BTC was a Hero member, but it can be done if you're diligent enough and post enough every day.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?



This program really pays. I was paid for last 2 month and have also enrolled for this month. Price is higher this month and if we are lucky enough it may even go higher. Dont worry about the payment. It is automatic.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1005
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Just close your eyes and sign up for the highest paid and trusted signature program of the forum.
Yes, he really pays! Smiley I ve got two payments already and hope i will still participate and be part of this project. It is not only the highest paying offer for posting on this forum, but it is almost the highest paid sig camp at all at all forums they pay for posting.
BR,

Gondel
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.

Why did only 1 uesr received over 1 BTC,many others should have as the price per post is high.Why haven't they?

sgk
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Just close your eyes and sign up for the highest paid and trusted signature program of the forum.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.

Yes, just received payment 2 months in a row from RitzGrandCasino.  One member received over 1 BTC last month posting here.

The negative feedback on RGC's trust is from other forum members who also have negative trust.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Does this program really pay like the op says,the thread seems untrusted.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Hello,

Re joining from "FULL MEMBER" Status
post count 219 ( 220 including this )

wallet :- 1NsxkwXCXUd1qBs3bisZ7msAKVzEezouPK

Thanks
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2713
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
BTW I'm Full Member now. (All my posts from May is in Full Member status) Should I do anything, or will system know me as Full Member automatically?

You're best messaging him to let him know. I don't think in this particular instance it updates automatically.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Have you guys seen this?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446

Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.

Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.

I am wondering now if Ritz will raise payment now to be truly 'HIGHEST SIGNATURE PAYMENT ON THE BOARD' or will he accept second place, this is  war or the end of line for him?
He doesn't really have to. These rates are fine. This race for the highest payment has to stop at some point or the campaign provides will run out of money pretty quickly.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
BTW I'm Full Member now. (All my posts from May is in Full Member status) Should I do anything, or will system know me as Full Member automatically?
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
I was not online for medical reasons. Now I'm back again. I see I got paid from Ritz. Thank you again for this opportunity.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2713
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread.  But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper.  I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something  [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]

Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network

He already left positive feedback for Ritz (as did someone else). If you look at Ritz's feedback he has a (+2). I think to neutralise it you'd need at least two positives and from someone directly on the trust list, not someone put there by another. Negative feedback seems to hold more weight than positive too, but it's a confusing system to say the least.

I think STT is saying Equate not only need to leave +ve Trust but also add Ritz in his trust setting to have this +ve trust in effect. Looks like for -ve trust to show, one does not need to add in trust setting, but for +ve trust to show, it is required.

I still don't think it will matter because most people have the 'Trust depth' set at 2 as standard and it'd need to be at a trust depth of 3, not to mention he might not want to put him on his trusted list. I'm sure Ritz's feedback score will balance out eventually as long as he doesn't keep getting more. Threatening people with legal action wont help as well.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1052
I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread.  But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper.  I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something  [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]

Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network

He already left positive feedback for Ritz (as did someone else). If you look at Ritz's feedback he has a (+2). I think to neutralise it you'd need at least two positives and from someone directly on the trust list, not someone put there by another. Negative feedback seems to hold more weight than positive too, but it's a confusing system to say the least.

I think STT is saying Equate not only need to leave +ve Trust but also add Ritz in his trust setting to have this +ve trust in effect. Looks like for -ve trust to show, one does not need to add in trust setting, but for +ve trust to show, it is required.
Pages:
Jump to: