Hello!
I want to join the campaign today!
BTC: 1EZEBjmMYxS5GvuwJJaHjUhTjKzS1EG98S
post count 128
Topic: ★★★ EARN A WHOPPING 25% ON PROFITS - RitzGrandCasino.com ★★★ - page 26. (Read 71339 times)
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread. But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper. I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]
Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network
Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network
He already left positive feedback for Ritz (as did someone else). If you look at Ritz's feedback he has a (+2). I think to neutralise it you'd need at least two positives and from someone directly on the trust list, not someone put there by another. Negative feedback seems to hold more weight than positive too, but it's a confusing system to say the least.
I forget his name now without searching posts from the start of the month on this thread. But one guy got one of the highest payouts and is also in the trust network proper. I think he does escrow, now if he not only leaves trust but adds Ritz into his network then it actually counts for something [might be equate Im thinking of, of course its upto him but most of us are peasants]
Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network
Me doing either of those things doesnt matter because Ive not done escrow and Im not in anyones network
Have you guys seen this?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.
I am wondering now if Ritz will raise payment now to be truly 'HIGHEST SIGNATURE PAYMENT ON THE BOARD' or will he accept second place, this is war or the end of line for him?
Have you guys seen this?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.
I am wondering now if Ritz will raise payment now to be truly 'HIGHEST SIGNATURE PAYMENT ON THE BOARD' or will he accept second place, this is war or the end of line for him?
Have you guys seen this?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
Yeah, I think that topic came up a few pages ago.
Have you guys seen this?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/we-pay-for-signature-even-more-up-to-00016-btcs-per-post-w-600446
Apparently Ritz is not offering the highest signature payment on the board anymore. There is faster horse in the stable.
FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning. I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.
I just checked his post. It is still showing [-6: -1 / +2(2)] for me !!!
I wonder if there's someone in you guys' trust group who's not in mine. I don't see any negative on him. Although, if I click on his name, I can of course see the entire collection of feedback.
FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning. I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.
I just checked his post. It is still showing [-6: -1 / +2(2)] for me !!!
FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning. I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.
I still see them with the negative trust warning... did you add Ritz to your trust list? I think that would be the only way for you not to see the warning.
EDIT: and looking at the feedback left, it all still appears to be there.
FWIW, I see Ritz' posts without any red warning. I don't know if something has changed with the trust situation since everyone was talking about it, but I don't see the warning anymore.
The only way you'll get him out of the 'trust circle' is to get whoever put him on the trusted list to take him off. Ritz adding people to his trust won't make a difference to anyone else. Other people will still see the negative rating.
You can easily find that in the trust settings.It was CanaryInTheMine who added him.
I'm not getting a simple thing. Ritz has 2 -ve from people of +ve trust and 2 +ve from people of +ve trust. He has added none to his trust circle. So he should be standing at 0 trust now !!! Why -ve ?
The only way you'll get him out of the 'trust circle' is to get whoever put him on the trusted list to take him off. Ritz adding people to his trust won't make a difference to anyone else. Other people will still see the negative rating.
You can easily find that in the trust settings.It was CanaryInTheMine who added him.
global moderator
Activity: 3934
Merit: 2676
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
The only way you'll get him out of the 'trust circle' is to get whoever put him on the trusted list to take him off. Ritz adding people to his trust won't make a difference to anyone else. Other people will still see the negative rating.
i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz? 
i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation
i wonder why jelousy needs to be born
Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here. i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputationi wonder why jelousy needs to be born
exactly
but why he only chased ritz then? how about the others Please read this thread and you'll know why Ritz was targetted => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=499007.1460
I think, if all of us contribute in this thread with proper reasoning, we may take zackclark70 out of trust circle.
i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz? i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation
i wonder why jelousy needs to be born
Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here. i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputationi wonder why jelousy needs to be born
exactly
but why he only chased ritz then? how about the others i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz? i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputation
i wonder why jelousy needs to be born
Well this is what I'm thinking. If he gave Ritz negative rating for promoting spam (which he isn't), he should give negative rating to the likes of Stunna and others who have these signature campaigns too. I don't really care about this trust rating, and neither should Ritz nor any user around here. i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputationi wonder why jelousy needs to be born
I just was catching up on my trust posts. I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.
when you get a chance please do so for me.
Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.
Actually if you look at Ritz trust rating, it is very incorrect.when you get a chance please do so for me.
Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.
We have this:
Quote
zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2) 2014-02-28 0.00000000 paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts
First off it isn't 6500 posts nor is it 2.6 BTC. He gave only Ritz negative rating while there are other competitors doing the same. Please. As I saw the feedback. I think It's stupid to give feedback like that for spamming It's staff or moderator business to deal with this.
Actually if you look at Ritz trust rating, it is very incorrect.
We have this:
Quote
zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2) 2014-02-28 0.00000000 paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts
First off it isn't 6500 posts nor is it 2.6 BTC. He gave only Ritz negative rating while there are other competitors doing the same. Please. [/quote]
i smell something fishy here why he is so against ritz?
i mean ritz is paying his/her worker properly just like those other campaigns but since he/she is the highest one some people is trying to ruin his reputationi wonder why jelousy needs to be born
I just was catching up on my trust posts. I gave you a positive trust for april 2014.
when you get a chance please do so for me.
Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.
Actually if you look at Ritz trust rating, it is very incorrect.when you get a chance please do so for me.
Thanks and looking forward to may's payout.
We have this:
Quote
zackclark70 1: -0 / +2(2) 2014-02-28 0.00000000 paying people up to 2.6 BTC for posting up to 6500 posts a month for his add campaign spamming up the forum and deleting any negative posts
First off it isn't 6500 posts nor is it 2.6 BTC. He gave only Ritz negative rating while there are other competitors doing the same. Please. Jump to: