Pages:
Author

Topic: Economic Implications of War on Individuals - page 9. (Read 3331 times)

legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1041
It is hardly to be expected that anyone would have the idea that business can be done for survival during wartime. I think the only survival tip is to survive at any cost in any situation. The best way to think is to keep the brain as still as possible. War means destruction, destruction of the human body and mind, destruction of the economy, destruction of infrastructure, destruction of education, shelter, and medical care all basic needs are distorted. All the resources around you are very likely to be destroyed during the war, so to survive the war and develop from here, the only thing to do is to use those resources to save money through cryptocurrencies which will help you survive later.

If the billionaires are building their bunkers to hide when the shit hits the fan, maybe an ordinary person can also build his own. I think the war will not happen abruptly, there is still time. They are still not done with their bunkers.

There are war preppers on youtube who give tips to survive the apocalypse. It's after the war is where the real challenge for those who survived because the rest of those who survived are also going to kill each other for what they have.
jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 14
It is hardly to be expected that anyone would have the idea that business can be done for survival during wartime. I think the only survival tip is to survive at any cost in any situation. The best way to think is to keep the brain as still as possible. War means destruction, destruction of the human body and mind, destruction of the economy, destruction of infrastructure, destruction of education, shelter, and medical care all basic needs are distorted. All the resources around you are very likely to be destroyed during the war, so to survive the war and develop from here, the only thing to do is to use those resources to save money through cryptocurrencies which will help you survive later.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 209
War is an abomination to almost all people of the world. Conflict is almost as much a matter of contempt for all people as before. War or conflict, however, we define it, are roughly the same species that harm people which never gain.
Due to war or conflict, every country has to face a huge military economic loss which is a huge loss for a country. Just as people die through war, every person who is alive has to pass through a narrow period. Because every person who has no relatives has to live with high prices which we can call salt in the wound.
As the number of casualties increases between the parties involved in war, it is a great loss and the greatest loss is the humanitarian catastrophe that causes war. So let us stay away from war and conflict and maintain humanity.
war is wrong and other countries have benefited from it in terms of selling ammunition, For countries that are at war, the first question I always ask is: Why do countries go to war, Why can they settle whatever the issue may be? Most of the time, it is always about the territory, and before they go to war, they are supposed to consider the psychological effect of this action for Christ's sake Children are living in those places but all they care about at that particular time is how to get the other country to bow to there will. During the World War, a lot of people died. and they still did not learn from that. I am disappointed in some countries because, during this war, what some countries did was take sides when what they were supposed to be doing was looking for ways to settle them. and give them the condition that there should be a world jurisdiction so that when you don't listen, they sanction you. The number of lives lost in the whole process is worrisome, war should be permanently stopped among nations. If not, we are not going to end well in all these ways.
full member
Activity: 868
Merit: 202
....
The good news is that dedollarisation and economic blocs (BRICS, SCO, ASEAN, etc.) continue strengthening and expanding.

my country is part of the countries that support dedollarization. the leader of my country took quite controversial action, where america threatened to impose sanctions if our country continued to dedollarize. but this is not a problem, since our country is supported by other countries to dedollarize, because for a long time we have used usd in trade with other countries and that is not fair to the stability of our country's economy and currency.
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245

Russia's intervention in Ukraine and Israel's intervention in Gaza are examples that cannot be avoided and there must be a peaceful solution immediately, that is the best for the people.
It's hard to agree with your assertion that Russia's invasion of Ukraine could not have been avoided. If the United States and European countries had reacted more decisively to Russia's 2014 seizure of Ukraine's Crimea peninsula, as well as parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, the Kremlin would likely be hesitant to launch a large-scale invasion of Ukraine with its eight armies in February 2022.
At that time, the United States and European countries were afraid of angering the aggressor and escalating the military conflict. Now they have to dramatically increase their armies and weapons production, and Europe has to prepare to repel a Russian attack on its territory.

But the situation of the conflict between Hamas and Israel is somewhat different. If Hamas had not attacked Israel on October 7 last year and its militants had not begun to indiscriminately kill Israelis, as well as take them hostage and take them to the Gaza Strip, then Israel would not now be carrying out retaliatory military actions to free the hostages and clear the Gaza Strip from Hamas to avoid a repeat attack in the future.

Quick peaceful resolutions to military conflicts do not always lead to lasting peace. Freezing the conflict in Ukraine now, when Ukraine is actually losing part of its territories, and Russia looks weak against this background, because it has not fully resolved any of its published goals, will not suit either side and will only be used by Russia to accumulate military power and the continuation of aggression against Ukraine in the future.
If Israel does not eliminate Hamas now, then over time the shelling from the Gaza Strip will continue again.
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 267
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
of course the effects of war will have an effect on the prices of all goods will rise. especially food prices will skyrocket. war conditions agricultural land will be destroyed. food needs imports. imports in war conditions will be difficult to enter. money becomes useless if the conditions of war. the next effect will experience famine conditions. unless there is outside assistance entering the example of Ukraine.
War is clearly detrimental to both sides. All budgets prioritize the purchase of war equipment for either attack or defense. Funds that should have been allocated for food, clothing and public health needs ultimately had to be ignored for war equipment.
The destruction of infrastructure means that it cannot be effective in producing anything that should be intended for living needs or exported to earn foreign exchange. The structure is no longer normal for distribution.

Everything is unfavorable for life in general and individuals with the existence of war because of this reason, there is no other way that stopping war is the main solution to be able to provide a sense of calm and be able to live normally.
Russia's intervention in Ukraine and Israel's intervention in Gaza are examples that cannot be avoided and there must be a peaceful solution immediately, that is the best for the people.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 15
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
February 21, 2024, 11:00:01 AM
War is an abomination to almost all people of the world. Conflict is almost as much a matter of contempt for all people as before. War or conflict, however, we define it, are roughly the same species that harm people which never gain.
Due to war or conflict, every country has to face a huge military economic loss which is a huge loss for a country. Just as people die through war, every person who is alive has to pass through a narrow period. Because every person who has no relatives has to live with high prices which we can call salt in the wound.
As the number of casualties increases between the parties involved in war, it is a great loss and the greatest loss is the humanitarian catastrophe that causes war. So let us stay away from war and conflict and maintain humanity.
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245
February 11, 2024, 03:24:36 AM

Does United States allow Ukraine to attack Russia that way? Like attacking Russian weapon factories, refineries, etc.? No, absolutely not! Since US wants to turn Ukraine to Russia's Afghanistan, this is why they neither gives them any weapon with a range more than 100-300 km range, nor allows them to manufacture one themselves.
No one can prohibit Ukraine from striking Russian territory with its own weapons. Therefore, Ukraine continues to destroy military facilities on Russian territory, and has also begun to destroy dual-use facilities, which are oil refineries and fuel tanks on Russian territory, which contribute to increasing Russia’s military power.

Just since the beginning of 2024, Ukrainian drones have attacked a dozen oil refineries in the Russian Federation. Thus, on January 9, in the Russian city of Orel, drones attacked a fuel and energy complex.

On the night of January 18, Ukrainian drones attacked an oil terminal in St. Petersburg.

On January 19, oil tanks caught fire at an oil depot in the city of Klintsy, Bryansk region.
On January 20, loud explosions were heard again at the same oil depot. The oil depot burned for two days in a row.

On the night of January 21, the Novatek fuel plant was closed due to a Ukrainian drone attack on the sea terminal in Ust-Luga, Leningrad region. This plant processed fuel for the Russian Armed Forces. After the SBU attack, all tankers located at the terminal went far out to sea.

After a fire on January 25, the largest oil refinery in Tuapse, a city in the Krasnodar region and a major port on the Black Sea coast, was paralyzed due to a Ukrainian drone strike. This plant annually processes up to 9 million tons of raw materials and is one of the ten largest in the Russian Federation.

On January 30, Ukrainian drones hit the Kaluganefteprodukt oil depot in the Kaluga region.

On January 31, explosions occurred at an oil refinery in St. Petersburg. The Nevsky Mazut oil refinery was hit by drones.

On the night of February 3, an attack was carried out on the Lukoil oil refinery in the Volgograd region. The drone struck a primary oil refinery plant producing ELOU-AVT-5 fuel.

On the night of February 9, a fire broke out at the Ilsky oil refinery in the Seversky district of the Krasnodar Territory. A primary processing plant with a capacity of 3.6 million tons per year was hit. Without it, Russians will not be able to produce diesel fuel for military needs. The price of such an installation is about $50 million.

In addition, on the night of February 9, explosions occurred at the Afipsky oil refinery, which is also located in the Krasnodar Territory. Both objects are located about 20 km from each other.
https://24tv.ua/ru/ilskij-npz-gorit-posle-vzryvov-rossijane-zajavili-o-bpla_n2490930

I cited only cases of attacks by Ukrainian drones on oil refineries in Russia over the past month and a half. In this regard, only in the first month of 2024, Russian oil companies reduced gasoline exports abroad by 37%. Sales of diesel fuel, the largest export of petroleum products, fell 23%.

Ukraine is also simultaneously attacking Russian factories that produce military products. This list is also impressive even in recent months.
hero member
Activity: 1722
Merit: 895
February 11, 2024, 12:36:02 AM
I am deeply saddened by these wars. I am not taking sides because there are human causalities in both sides
No one wants war because the big effects of war can affect human life in general. War will make things worse because the necessary access could be closed and life would not be much safer in it, so it could affect the economy, health and other sectors.

- do you have any survival tips during war period?
There is almost no way to survive during a war because talking about security is quite problematic, not to mention talking about fulfilling life in the basic needs sector as a basis that needs to be prepared for food needs.

- are there any business that I can do during a period of war so as to sustain my family? Can I still budget, save and earn in Bitcoin?
Saving is not done during war, but you have to do it long before war occurs and vice versa regarding investing in bitcoin. But if your financial structure is a little better, you can still invest in bitcoin as long as internet access and electricity are still available in your country.

- What is the economic impacts on individuals with families and how do I sustain them during war period.
Avoid leaving the house and don't buy ready-to-eat food because it can be expensive, but instead buy basic necessities that can be prepared at home so you can stretch your budget a little. Another way is to interact with the security system that supports the community and ask for a little help with the food they provide so you can save money.
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245
February 10, 2024, 09:55:32 PM


And some people still have a hard time believing the US congress members statements when they say "We [meaning US] will fight Russians to the last Ukrainian". This is exactly why Ukraine has been losing and will continue to lose as long as they fight for US and not for Ukraine.

And which member of the US Congress declared that the United States would fight the Russians to the last Ukrainian? Can you refer to any media information about this?

No Western officials, of course, have ever said anything like this. The first instance of the use of the formula “war to the last Ukrainian” was found in a column by veteran American politician Ron Paul, published on his own website on March 14, 2022. Paul has not held any public office for almost 10 years.

But such statements are used by Russian propagandists and presented almost as the official position of the United States. The goal is simple - to “replace” the enemy: they say that Russia is not fighting with Ukraine, but with the entire “collective West”. This makes it easier to explain the obvious failures: the failure of the operation to quickly capture Kyiv in February-March, the September counter-offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kharkov region, the surrender of Kherson in November 2022.

A similar statement was also made by retired American diplomat Chas Freeman in his article for the information portal The Gray Zone, who is not a current US official and expressed only his personal opinion.
Freeman was once the US ambassador to Saudi Arabia. But his reputation has long been hopelessly damaged: for example, he said that the Chinese authorities were too lenient with the “extras” of protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989 (then, according to various estimates, from several hundred to several thousand people died).
https://m.gazeta.ru/army/news/2022/03/28/17485021.shtml
https://m.gazeta.ru/army/news/2022/03/28/17485021.shtml

Only Putin spoke about this from state officials: “Ukraine’s mobilization reserve is not limitless; it seems that Western countries are ready to fight to the last Ukrainian,” Putin briefly noted.
https://news.obozrevatel.com/russia/do-poslednego-ukraintsa-putin-sdelal-tsinichnoe-zayavlenie-o-vojne-obviniv-vo-vsem-zapad.htm
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
February 10, 2024, 10:47:06 AM
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, general Zaluzhnyi was fired just because he wasn't obeying NATO orders and was trying to fight for Ukraine and not for US. He was also going against the US installed Zionist puppet.
He was replaced by "The Butcher" because his replacement is known for obeying NATO orders...

And some people still have a hard time believing the US congress members statements when they say "We [meaning US] will fight Russians to the last Ukrainian". This is exactly why Ukraine has been losing and will continue to lose as long as they fight for US and not for Ukraine.

All of this mess will continue and the global economy will suffer as the result. Which is at the same time highlighting the importance of decoupling the economy and deglobalizing it which starts with dedollarisation and will continue with economic blocs that separate themselves from the dollar and US policies such as warmongering that affects the economy.
The good news is that dedollarisation and economic blocs (BRICS, SCO, ASEAN, etc.) continue strengthening and expanding.

I'll be very brief:  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Friendly advice - quit using illegal drugs ! Otherwise you will soon see unicorns and flat earth !  Grin




The call sign of the new commander-in-chief of the AFU is "Bars". He has been in charge of the land forces of the AFU since 2019, participated in the successful defense and development of Kiev and the destruction of Russian Nazis in Kiev and Kiev region, and was the organizer of the beautiful Kharkiv counterattack, when the "second army of the world" fled faster than sound, covering the Ukrainian land with piles of their equipment and bodies of terrorists of the Russian army. Then the "heroic Putin" called it a "goodwill gesture"  Grin Grin Grin Grin Apparently, Putin was also under the influence of strong drugs  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
February 10, 2024, 09:37:44 AM
I think even if they fight for their country it won't change anything, Russia's weapons are more complete than Ukraine's, enthusiasm alone is not enough, you need more than that.
Or has this become a scenario that must happen and is what the global elite wants?
I have to disagree since history is filled with examples where the invaded country defeats the invaders who had "more complete weapons". I can even give you two live examples: Yemen and Palestine. Both are facing a much more powerful and much better equipped invaders and both have been defeating their enemies.

For example in case of Yemen the invasion lasted more than 8 years and only recently it "paused" with a cease fire. Do you know why? The invaders (ie. US-Arab coalition) were forced to stop the invasion and slaughter the moment Armed Forces of Yemen started hitting them where it hurt the most, deep into their territories and their infrastructure like the Aramco oil facilities.

Does United States allow Ukraine to attack Russia that way? Like attacking Russian weapon factories, refineries, etc.? No, absolutely not! Since US wants to turn Ukraine to Russia's Afghanistan, this is why they neither gives them any weapon with a range more than 100-300 km range, nor allows them to manufacture one themselves.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 267
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
February 10, 2024, 08:38:53 AM
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, general Zaluzhnyi was fired just because he wasn't obeying NATO orders and was trying to fight for Ukraine and not for US. He was also going against the US installed Zionist puppet.
He was replaced by "The Butcher" because his replacement is known for obeying NATO orders...

And some people still have a hard time believing the US congress members statements when they say "We [meaning US] will fight Russians to the last Ukrainian". This is exactly why Ukraine has been losing and will continue to lose as long as they fight for US and not for Ukraine.

All of this mess will continue and the global economy will suffer as the result. Which is at the same time highlighting the importance of decoupling the economy and deglobalizing it which starts with dedollarisation and will continue with economic blocs that separate themselves from the dollar and US policies such as warmongering that affects the economy.
The good news is that dedollarisation and economic blocs (BRICS, SCO, ASEAN, etc.) continue strengthening and expanding.


I think even if they fight for their country it won't change anything, Russia's weapons are more complete than Ukraine's, enthusiasm alone is not enough, you need more than that.
Or has this become a scenario that must happen and is what the global elite wants?
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
February 10, 2024, 12:12:35 AM
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, general Zaluzhnyi was fired just because he wasn't obeying NATO orders and was trying to fight for Ukraine and not for US. He was also going against the US installed Zionist puppet.
He was replaced by "The Butcher" because his replacement is known for obeying NATO orders...

And some people still have a hard time believing the US congress members statements when they say "We [meaning US] will fight Russians to the last Ukrainian". This is exactly why Ukraine has been losing and will continue to lose as long as they fight for US and not for Ukraine.

All of this mess will continue and the global economy will suffer as the result. Which is at the same time highlighting the importance of decoupling the economy and deglobalizing it which starts with dedollarisation and will continue with economic blocs that separate themselves from the dollar and US policies such as warmongering that affects the economy.
The good news is that dedollarisation and economic blocs (BRICS, SCO, ASEAN, etc.) continue strengthening and expanding.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
February 09, 2024, 09:34:36 AM
"No money but a mouthful of bananas" is a short description of modern russia Grin Grin Grin

Russian authorities are launching a "banana scheme" to solve the problem of trade imbalance with India, which has increased its oil purchases from Russia 11 times since the war began, but has not launched a reciprocal flow of goods to the Russian market.

Bananas should patch up the "hole" in the Russian-Indian trade balance and possibly solve the problem of rupees hanging in India, the amount of which, according to Reuters, may reach $39 billion. This is the money that Indian refineries used to pay for Russian crude oil, having obeyed the requirement to conduct transactions in national currencies. However, it turned out to be impossible to withdraw rupees from India: local currency regulations prohibit this.

And all this against the backdrop of constant begging for arms from North Korea, Iran and other rogue countries.

Looking at this scheme, it makes me laugh when I imagine who and with what, in Russia, will pay to suppliers of shells to Russian terrorists! Will they slave off part of the Russian population ? They're used to it ! Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245
February 09, 2024, 04:01:40 AM

You have written whole 12 paragraphs of text but 0 proof. No facts, no sources. You have ignored my point, my question completely. Like a typical troll. 

I will paste my questions below once again: Really? Obvious? Can you provide any source, colonel?  Grin It doesn't look obvious to me at all. Russia will be exhausted after the war and they can't confront the entire NATO. That's BS. And why do your think Russia is going to seize the territory of Ukraine? Please quote any Russian politician or government official saying that.

It seems to me that I have completely answered your questions. Regarding the fact that Russia will not attack anyone after Ukraine, I gave a number of examples from the statements of the top officials of this state - Putin, Peskov and Lavrov that before the attack on Ukraine they also blatantly lied that they were not going to attack her. True, they lied and are lying not only about this. That is, there is no faith in the Russian leadership, they are complete liars. Therefore, what they continue to invent about the purpose of attacking Ukraine does not matter at all, since it is still a lie.

  In this regard, in response to your request to report on the reasons for Russia’s attack on Ukraine from the words of Russian officials, I wrote on January 28: “As for why Russia attacked Ukraine, the reasons and goals of this attack still change periodically. From the “demilitarization” and “denazification” of Ukraine in the first days of the terrorist attack to the statement by the governor of St. Petersburg that the motive for such an attack was the fight against mythical gender-neutral toilets in Ukraine. https://24tv.ua/ru/rossijskaja-propaganda -gubernator-petersburga-zajavil-chto-rossija_n2472841".

But if you want to talk more about it, let's talk. So, in Wikipedia it is written about this: As one of the justifications for the invasion, Vladimir Putin used the untrue representation of Ukraine as a neo-Nazi state leading genocide in the Donbass."
https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D1%87%D1%8C_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8 %D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0 %B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8 %D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83

In the same place, in the section “Content of the appeal” it is written: “Putin called the purpose of the invasion of Ukraine “the protection of people who have been subjected to bullying and genocide by the Kiev regime for eight years,” and in order to prevent the alleged bullying and genocide, Russia needs to “demilitarize and denazify Ukraine”[1].

That is, according to Putin, the Russians attacked Ukraine to protect Russian-speaking people in Donbass. Protected. Some previously prosperous settlements turned into complete ruins due to the scorched earth tactics of the invasion, with virtually no male population left. Those who survived the Russian artillery were mobilized for the war and at the front they were forced to attack in the front ranks, and behind them there were loading detachments that killed the retreating ones. The population of Donbass is being disposed of, and in their place, hundreds of thousands of Russians - Kazakhs, Buryats, Chechens and other nationalities - are being resettled from the depths of Russia, so that in the future the conquered territory will be more obedient to the Kremlin.

As for the “demilitarization” and “denazification” of Ukraine declared by Putin, a significant part of the Russian population not only does not understand the meaning of these words, but also cannot pronounce them. In fact, they mean the destruction of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as the destruction of Ukraine as a state and Ukrainians as a nation.

Then other reasons for the attack on Ukraine appeared, but if you want, more on that later.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
February 08, 2024, 05:04:17 PM
News from a "great and stable economy" Smiley
- Putin warned about cutting spending on science. Everything here seems to be logical - why science if you need to satisfy your painful ambitions Smiley By the way, medicine and education are also in the fire of a terrorist war against the developed world.

But this is not the end yet Smiley
- Putin demanded that technologies be invented to replace Western ones!

But so far, of all the successes of the “world leader”: oil in exchange for .. bananas and flowers Smiley
- The Russian authorities are launching a “banana scheme” to solve the problem of trade imbalance with India, which increased oil purchases in the Russian Federation 11 times after the start of the war, but did not launch a return flow of goods to the Russian market...

But they sell oil so profitably and expensively  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1191
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
February 08, 2024, 10:26:53 AM
European countries are now faced with the need to transfer their economies to a military footing, since it is already obvious that Russia will not limit itself to seizing the territory of Ukraine. This means that instead of efforts aimed at improving people’s lives, shells and missiles will be manufactured that will cause yet another mass of deaths.
Really? Obvious? Can you provide any source, colonel?  Grin It doesn't look obvious to me at all. Russia will be exhausted after the war and they can't confront the entire NATO. That's BS. And why do your think Russia is going to seize the territory of Ukraine? Please quote any Russian politician or government official saying that.

Nobody is forcing them to manufacture weapons. They themselves decided to choose a side in this conflict.
To begin with, Russia, until the last day before the full-scale invasion of Ukrainian territory in February 2022, also denied that they were going to attack Ukraine. At the same time, top Russian officials, including Putin, have repeatedly denied the existence of invasion plans and even ridiculed such Western fears. But they deceived and attacked.

I give examples.
The American newspaper The Washington Post was the first to publicly report the suspicious gathering of Russian troops to the border with Ukraine on October 30, 2021, and on November 1, this information with published satellite images was confirmed by Politico. The first reaction from the Russian side came on November 3, when the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, called these messages an “information salvo” and a “fake campaign.”

On November 12, Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov also joined in the denials. "Headlines like this are nothing more than empty, baseless escalation of tension. Russia poses no threat to anyone," he said. Later, Peskov tried to present this information as “camouflage to cover up the aggressive thoughts” not of Moscow, but of Kyiv, which allegedly wanted to “solve the problem of the southeast by force.”

On December 26, the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation answered Vladimir Solovyov’s question whether Russia would attack first: “Russia has never attacked anyone first.” On February 20, Peskov expanded on this idea: “Russia, which has experienced so many wars, is the last country in Europe that even wants to utter the word “war.”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also actively tried to convince the world community that Russia would not start a war. Speaking on January 21 at a press conference in Geneva after a meeting with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, he said, answering a question from an American journalist: “You are claiming that we are going to attack Ukraine, although we have already explained many times that this is not so. that this will happen, you immediately ask: “Why now?” And when should we not attack?” It seems that on February 24, a serious answer appeared to Lavrov’s humorous question.

On February 15, nine days before the invasion of Russian troops in Ukraine, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry called statements about an impending attack by Russia “information terrorism” and laughed at a Polish journalist who, at a press conference between Lavrov and Polish Foreign Minister Zbigniew Rau, asked: “That is, invasion will not be?". The head of Russian diplomacy called the media employee “unintelligible.”

Personally, Russian President Putin has also repeatedly denied plans to attack Ukraine. At the “Russia Calling” investment forum on November 30, 2021, he answered a direct question from one of the businessmen: “Should investors be wary of the possible deployment of Russian troops to Ukraine?” Putin reassured him: “Look, they talked about the possible entry of Russian troops into Ukraine at the beginning of the year - we conducted the Zapad-2021 exercises - but, as we see, this did not happen.”

After negotiations with French leader Emmanuel Macron on February 8, the Russian President again emphasized that the fears are unfounded: “The movement of our troops on our own, I want to emphasize, territory is presented as a threat of Russian invasion - in this case to Ukraine. The Baltic countries allegedly also feel in danger, and other states are our neighbors. On what basis is not very clear."

Even on February 22, having announced the recognition of the self-proclaimed “DPR” and “LPR” within the borders of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine, Putin argued that this did not mean war: “We expect, and I want to emphasize this, that all controversial issues will be resolved during negotiations between the current Kyiv authorities and the leadership of these republics."

Moreover, de facto declaring the start of war with Ukraine, the Russian President continued to contradict himself: “At the same time, our plans do not include the occupation of Ukrainian territories. We are not going to impose anything on anyone by force.”

  At various times in recent years, the Kremlin has expressed threats of attack against Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Finland, Moldova, Poland, Kazakhstan and even Germany. What, are they also lying?

Regarding why Russia attacked Ukraine, the reasons and goals of this attack are still periodically changed there. From the “demilitarization” and “denazification” of Ukraine in the early days of the attack, to the statement by the governor of St. Petersburg that the motivation for such an attack was the fight against the mythical gender-neutral toilets in Ukraine.
https://24tv.ua/ru/rossijskaja-propaganda-gubernator-peterburga-zajavil-chto-rossija_n2472841

You have written whole 12 paragraphs of text but 0 proof. No facts, no sources. You have ignored my point, my question completely. Like a typical troll. 

I will paste my questions below once again: Really? Obvious? Can you provide any source, colonel?  Grin It doesn't look obvious to me at all. Russia will be exhausted after the war and they can't confront the entire NATO. That's BS. And why do your think Russia is going to seize the territory of Ukraine? Please quote any Russian politician or government official saying that.

Which part of it you don't understand? I will translate this post into Ukrainian for you:

 cпpaвдi? Oчeвиднo? Чи мoжeтe ви нaдaти якecь джepeлo, пoлкoвникy? Grin Meнi цe зoвciм нe здaєтьcя oчeвидним. Pociя виcнaжитьcя пicля вiйни i нe змoжe пpoтиcтoяти вcьoмy HATO. Цe БC. I чoмy, нa вaшy дyмкy, Pociя збиpaєтьcя зaxoпити тepитopiю Укpaїни? Бyдь лacкa, пpoцитyйтe бyдь-якoгo pociйcькoгo пoлiтикa чи ypядoвця, який би цe cкaзaв.

And you're unhappy I'm calling you retarded? Only retarded people can't comprehend what they're being told.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 44
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest
February 08, 2024, 09:21:35 AM
I hate wars. I hate conflicts. Both they are almost unavailable. Wars and conflicts disrupts lives. It kills people - men, women, babies. Businesses are shot down. Schools are shot down. Boys become father's and look after their moms and siblings because their father has gone to war. Daughters become mothers and have to care for their siblings because they lose their mothers to war. Children with perfectly normal lives become refugees

Wars and conflicts doesn't give you the time to plan. It happens fast and it happens suddenly. It comes with a huge economic cost. And for us in the cryptocurrency, we are not exempted too. If you are a miner, your mining operation is affected because if you are caught up in the conflict, you have to abandon it and flee so that you do not get killed.

I am deeply saddened by these wars. I am not taking sides because there are human causalities in both sides.

- do you have any survival tips during war period?
- are there any business that I can do during a period of war so as to sustain my family? Can I still budget, save and earn in Bitcoin?
- What is the economic impacts on individuals with families and how do I sustain them during war period.

The hardest thing to think of is war and conflict even the so called warmonger always have the felt of losses course by war and conflict, no nation or society support it but occur as unforseen circumstances.
War destroys communities and families and often disrupts the development of the social and economic fabric of nations. The effects of war include long-term physical and psychological harm to children and adults, as well as reduction in material and human capital. Develop nation can turn under develop due to effects of war typical example the ongoing war in Ukraine many life , property economy and many to mention has been lost, it the worst thing to befall any nation.
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245
February 08, 2024, 04:38:51 AM
European countries are now faced with the need to transfer their economies to a military footing, since it is already obvious that Russia will not limit itself to seizing the territory of Ukraine. This means that instead of efforts aimed at improving people’s lives, shells and missiles will be manufactured that will cause yet another mass of deaths.
Really? Obvious? Can you provide any source, colonel?  Grin It doesn't look obvious to me at all. Russia will be exhausted after the war and they can't confront the entire NATO. That's BS. And why do your think Russia is going to seize the territory of Ukraine? Please quote any Russian politician or government official saying that.

Nobody is forcing them to manufacture weapons. They themselves decided to choose a side in this conflict.
To begin with, Russia, until the last day before the full-scale invasion of Ukrainian territory in February 2022, also denied that they were going to attack Ukraine. At the same time, top Russian officials, including Putin, have repeatedly denied the existence of invasion plans and even ridiculed such Western fears. But they deceived and attacked.

  At various times in recent years, the Kremlin has expressed threats of attack against Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Finland, Moldova, Poland, Kazakhstan and even Germany. What, are they also lying?

Regarding why Russia attacked Ukraine, the reasons and goals of this attack are still periodically changed there. From the “demilitarization” and “denazification” of Ukraine in the early days of the attack, to the statement by the governor of St. Petersburg that the motivation for such an attack was the fight against the mythical gender-neutral toilets in Ukraine.
https://24tv.ua/ru/rossijskaja-propaganda-gubernator-peterburga-zajavil-chto-rossija_n2472841

But what did you expect? Russia doesn't want a hostile country right next to it's border, hundreds of kilometres away from Moscow... Imagine Putin visiting Mexico and giving away cookies to people in order to overthrow the government and install a new pro-Russian one. Then flooding Mexico with Russian arms and training Mexican military. What would the US do?  Grin
In Russia, any neighboring state that refuses to fall under its direct influence and that tries to conduct independent foreign policy activities is considered hostile. Russia has consistently adhered to this policy for many centuries, so wars of aggression have become the norm for it, and now it includes many nations and nationalities, which the Kremlin continues to ruthlessly exploit, sucking oil, gas and other natural resources from their territories.

Therefore, those neighboring states that join any defensive alliances that do not include or dominate Russia pose a particular danger to Russia. Therefore, it does not matter whether it will be NATO or another military alliance. The danger for Russia is the very difficulty of continuing further violent influence on them.

Any explanations for aggression on the part of Russia have no meaning. These reasons will change depending on changes in the situation, as happens in explaining the reasons for the attack on Ukraine. There is only one reason: Ukraine allowed itself the impudence to leave Russia’s zone of influence. And fairy tales about NATO’s hostility remain fairy tales only for the domestic audience; the world community has long understood the parasitic essence of the Kremlin. Therefore, evil must be eradicated; it is useless to negotiate with it.
Pages:
Jump to: