i think they are both pieces of shit in their own ways and symbolic of the insane lack of rationality in this market that needs to be taken outside and have its brains blown out.
in a couple of years people will look back on them and shake their heads in wonder at the valuations they achieved in their present condition.
Topic: EOS or IOTA? - page 8. (Read 1186 times)
they both scale
They both sacrifice a little bit of decentralization for scalability
Which one to choose and why?
They both sacrifice a little bit of decentralization for scalability
Which one to choose and why?
I like EOS than IOTA because price of EOS is so stable and sometimes kicking even market is red . I like to see more project in EOS and hoping for it to go to the moon .
Of course EOS. Many projects claim that after the release of the main net of EOS they will switch to EOS blockchain from the etherium. Etherium has big problems with scalability.
EOS will use its blockchain but remember NO ETA about that. I guess you should learn even more about the blockchain system and scalability problem doesn't matter because it can be solved through hardfork. More and more companies will do the same as EOS. Universa or Credits even optimistic to build more than 100k tps platform and compared to the EOS and EOS looks nothin.
I like EOS more than IOTA, maybe that's quite subjective, but that's my point
Would go with IOTA any time because of strong partnerships and the Foundation. Imo they are the best at the moment when it comes to partnerships and united expertise in crypto. Just huge.
Besides Verge's partnerships, obviously. j/k
Still excited what EOS eventually will deliver.
Besides Verge's partnerships, obviously. j/k
Still excited what EOS eventually will deliver.
For me its EOS. Why? Because the EOS main net will resolve the scalability issues of blockchain technology. The EOS ICO is about to end by June 2018. when that happens, many ICO will run or switch into EOS blockchain. Decentralized crypto exchange can also run under EOS blockchain. Just one good example is EOSFinex. https://news.bitcoin.com/bitfinex-plans-launch-decentralized-exchange-eosfinex/
I would choose EOS, as I studied it and saw a great perspective. Look at its movement over the past half year. It is continually growing despite the correction. It seems to me that when the ICO ends it will improve very much and you can earn a lot on it. 
I see a lot of potential in IOTA, but unfortunately the technological tools are not as common as it would be to get into the project. Maybe 5 years later IOTA will be a part of our life, but it will take some time now to pass it on.
Both have issues. EOS doesn't have a product and IOTA have security issues. But based on what is in existence it would have to be IOTA just because there is more of a product there. EOS at the moment is nothing but hype
Of course EOS. Many projects claim that after the release of the main net of EOS they will switch to EOS blockchain from the etherium. Etherium has big problems with scalability.
honestly guys I'm scared by IOTA, that their hashing protocol... who knows what is that... And what about EOS, I see that very soon it may be the cryptocurrency number 2 on coinmarkecap.
Both good coins. Teams are strong. The future of both is brilliant to me. I think the future of both is brilliant. But if I choose one, it must be IOTA
There are no doubt about that EOS is the better one. Higher rank, higher price and at the moment EOS is pumping while IOTA is dumping 
. But at this time IOTA is a better choice to ivnest in cause IOTA price is dumping so you can buy it now and wait for the next pump but invest in EOS atm is a little bit risky if you just want to invest for shortterm cause it's already pumped.
I also see IOTA still has good potential in the future. so I think this time can be used as the best choice to buy IOTA at cheap price and can hold or sell when high price in some time to come. . But at this time IOTA is a better choice to ivnest in cause IOTA price is dumping so you can buy it now and wait for the next pump but invest in EOS atm is a little bit risky if you just want to invest for shortterm cause it's already pumped.
There are no doubt about that EOS is the better one. Higher rank, higher price and at the moment EOS is pumping while IOTA is dumping . But at this time IOTA is a better choice to ivnest in cause IOTA price is dumping so you can buy it now and wait for the next pump but invest in EOS atm is a little bit risky if you just want to invest for shortterm cause it's already pumped.
. But at this time IOTA is a better choice to ivnest in cause IOTA price is dumping so you can buy it now and wait for the next pump but invest in EOS atm is a little bit risky if you just want to invest for shortterm cause it's already pumped. 
they both scale
They both sacrifice a little bit of decentralization for scalability
Which one to choose and why?
They both sacrifice a little bit of decentralization for scalability
Which one to choose and why?
From a solely speculative point of view, I'd go with EOS for more profit in the short run.
To me, any Larimer projects, whether BTS, STEEM or now EOS gets hyped really easily. And when EOS main net launches that's going to be no exception. Price is going to go through the roof for sure, and investing now is still a good buying point as not many people know about EOS still.
IOTA has already been pumped, I think it's the better long term investment because of its plans of getting anonymity integrated into its network. But for now, the software is buggy and not a lot of people use IOTA which means confirmation speeds are slow, so getting IOTA hyped up is honestly very difficult.
IOTA have innovation they create their own technology called the "tangle" which is different from the blockchain where most of the cryptocurrency are using today. There is no chain and there is no block , Tangle has it unique scalabilty feature it is a combimation of IoT and their tangle network. Although there are still no solid evidence on how secure is their network. Comparing to EOS, IOTA is better in terms of technology.
It's really hard to decide cause both of these coins are really good and has high rank on coinmarketcap but I think everyone will have their own opinion and choice. Some people will choose depend on rank but some others will choose depend on price ). For low captial trader and investor I think IOTA is a better choice for them cause IOTA price is 8 times lower than EOS but with other traders maybe they'll choose EOS although EOS price is much higher than IOTA cause EOS has higher rank than IOTA 
). For low captial trader and investor I think IOTA is a better choice for them cause IOTA price is 8 times lower than EOS but with other traders maybe they'll choose EOS although EOS price is much higher than IOTA cause EOS has higher rank than IOTA
IOTA vs EOS isnt it like apples vs oranges little bit ?
Well it's hard to choose between EOS and iota, they are both good coins, if i had to pick One between them i would invest in EOS, it has more possibilities to grow in the future
On their website IOTA claims to have important partnerships with Microsoft, Bosh... but why there are always people who say that is not true?
They do have partnerships with Bosch, Fujitsu, VW, etc. A Microsoft employee was the one who wrote that it was a partnership in the media he gave IOTA--IOTA didn't just pull it out of their asses. Pretty sad that this has overshadowed the actual partnerships, but it proves how much speculators in cryptoland don't bother to research and repeat whatever is handed them.
Also, they don't "sacrifice decentralization for scalability," DAGs are simply vulnerable to attacks when their networks are small and the coordinator acts as a security measure in the early going--I already pointed this out in your other thread, but apparently you don't read your own thread or just choose to repeat falsehoods.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34218823
Um, yes, IOTA is centralized. Let me put it this way. If a coin is launched with an ICO, then you bet it is centralized, despite what the developers will want you to think. Of course, I think there are some that have in their roadmaps a way to eventually decentralize, but then that's a roundabout way to do things to me. But I suppose it was unavoidable. Even Satoshi had to decide and even mine on his own at one point. And then he left. And natural order happened. So,,, your point does not have a point maybe?
It wasn't a choice against decentralization or a roundabout way to get there, it was a solution to an inherent problem in DAGs. Until there is enough tx, the network is especially vulnerable to attacks, so the coordinator serves as a protection. The devs have stated over and over that it will be opensourced, and when they feel the network is large enough, they will remove it.
Jump to: