It's a pitty that you need to keep the wallet open, because the 'interest feature' was very low energy consuming.
Yeah.. my initial sensation was that this one kills it for me. If it goes to this then I'm with Rw13, maybe it should be removed.
It will stay low energy consuming, the wallet will have the same low memory footprint as before, just you have to leave it open.
The "work" you are contributing in this case is a hypothetical mining, that may never happen. You are rewarded for providing the
mining CAPABILITY in case of an low mining power emergency (which didn't really happen since this wallet existed). So the only thing
that will be measures is uptime of the wallet, which will have to be about 60% of the locking time. Term-deposit rates will simply work the same as before.
Also the mechanism is exactly the same.
How does it work then? How long coins would be locked? If it is just like Termdeposit then I can lock them for example for 2 weeks, but I still get 5%? Do I need to keep that wallet open for 2 straight weeks?
Term-deposit will work exactly the same, its just a "trick", to keep regulators away, by defining a "work" for the reward.
The work is "uptime" in a binary sense (you have 60% uptime, then Termdeposit will go like it always did, you are beliw 60% uptime, Termdeposit wiill fail and your coins will return)
Let me highlight that:a) i do not feel this will be the final way to do it, FINANCECLOUD will give us enough opportunities to bind this earning to a
"work" that will make not only more sense, but will also create another advantage for ERC inside of the Financecloud. See it as an
Placeholder to keep the regulators in check wile rethinking this carefully and without pressure.
b) Ideas are always welcome.
So let me outline once more the problem, we are solving with this change: Termdeposit in its current form, pays without any work to be done. This leads the US, to classify ERC as an security.
This fact would not directly a problem for us, but for exchanges, which would lead them to have to delist us.
We are closely working with them, Bittrex is even paying the lawyer, who is helping us to get this done correctly
So if you have a different idea, that you think is better, THIS IS THE THING your idea should do:
We need to define a form of work, that we can claim, to be the reason for the given Termdeposit reward.c) Keeping wallet open for a nearly improbable possibility to mine (which in a the rare case of happening would of course be rewarded extra)
does not change the zero memory footprint of the Termdeposit function and we will find ways to also even eliminate the given inconveniences.
(lets "assume" a "third party" that is "not us" could start providing an uptime fake bot
)
have fun
Matthias