Every day humans prove evolution, by mating two animals and creating a new one.
The Creation hoax can't prove anything .
The Creation hoax can't prove anything .
The simple word "evolution" can be applied to all kinds of things. But evolution theory evolution (ETE) can't be shown to be true until there is proof that one kind of animal changed into another kind of animal over thousands of years.
The only way we presently know how to do this accurately is through DNA sampling. But you can't sample DNA from animals that haven't existed for thousands of years without a time machine to go back there to get samples.
Scientists know this, yet they emphatically state that ETE is true and real when they know that they don't really know such. This is the thing that turns evolution into a hoax.
''without a time machine to go back there to get samples.'' And yet you think it's perfectly ok to claim god and jesus existed and were down here thousands of years ago even though there is 0 proof of it?
I don't think that at all. But since this is an evolution thread, shouldn't you be talking about evolution here? Whether or not you believe or understand things of the Bible, isn't it about time that you understand that...
Evolution is a hoax!
Well since you ignore when you are proven wrong like last time about ''Note that it is not known that virtually all scientists accept evolution from a standpoint of close examination. ''
You literally provided 0 evidence for your claim, I provided a ton of different studies and polls showing the huge acceptance by the scientific community when it comes to evolution, in fact not only scientists but a lot of religious people accept evolution, more than half in some cases and notable figures like the Pope and more.
The claim about scientist accepting evolution or not isn't all that important. Why not? Because none of them have ever come up with any difinitive proof. How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines. The few cases where science has thought it had proof for evolution, have been shown by other scientists to be false or inconclusive.
In fact, most major evolution scientists, and nuts like Dawkins, say or write that the whole evolution idea doesn't really have a leg to stand on. And then there are the more than 1000... https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/31694-over-1-000-scientists-openly-dissent-from-evolution-theory.
But scientists aren't what the topic is about. Still no proof for evolution, but lots of blab that it exists.
Evolution is a hoax.
EDIT: A question about you is, Why are you so anxious to claim that evolution exists when you can't show any proof? What are you really after? The further promotion of a lie?
What's important here is that you never admit when you are wrong. You claimed most scientists do not accept evolution and yet you have been shown to be wrong but you never admitted it. This shows an inability to admit when you are wrong, if you can't admit you are wrong on that, you will not admit you are wrong on anything.
''How do we know? Because they would have blasted the proof as proof all over the headlines.'' Well... Let's see..
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230201/
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/09/health/eyebrows-hominin-human-evolution/index.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29040024/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/signs-evolution-action/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/human-evolution-101/
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100901-science-animals-evolution-australia-lizard-skink-live-birth-eggs/
Are those headlines what I'm seeing there? Heh, guess you are proven wrong again?
