Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 29. (Read 108030 times)

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual.

The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies.

Evolution is a hoax.

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously.

The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6:

I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.'

and

John 10:34:

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 01:36:57 PM

Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'?

We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.

Scientific method, right? How is it then that some sources say the earth is 40+ billion years old and then you find other that say 50+ billion years. I wonder how idiotic these guys can be.

How is it that you just come here to say the most idiotic thing possible? You could literally google that in 1 second and find out the age of the earth is around 4 billion years old, not 40?? Are you this dumb or?

stevenirons21

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 10:26:35 AM

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 09:56:18 AM

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 09:47:37 AM

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 08:41:39 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual.

The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies.

Evolution is a hoax.

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously.

The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6:

I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.'

and

John 10:34:

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 10:26:35 AM

Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'?

We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.

Scientific method, right? How is it then that some sources say the earth is 40+ billion years old and then you find other that say 50+ billion years. I wonder how idiotic these guys can be.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 09:56:18 AM

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 09:47:37 AM

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 08:41:39 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual.

The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies.

Evolution is a hoax.

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously.

The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6:

I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.'

and

John 10:34:

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 10:33:37 AM

Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'?

We can't know if something is factual 100% ever, badecker, this argument is meaningless. Science has figured out the age of the earth and universe using the scientific method. No one has figured out god existence using the scientific method, end of the story.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 10:26:35 AM

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist

Damned! Forgot the fact that if you can't prove something doesn't exist then it musts exist.

Do you know someone who has proved the non existence of Odin?
Then Odin must exists.
As well as unicorns, giants, gnomes, valkyries and the other 5225478 gods that have been invented at a moment or another in History.

Actually, you forgot to include the rest of my post. Oh, my mistake. You neglected to include it intentionally. Why did you neglect? Because it would show you that your post is not an appropriate response for mine.

Cool

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 10:26:35 AM

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist

Damned! Forgot the fact that if you can't prove something doesn't exist then it musts exist.

Do you know someone who has proved the non existence of Odin?
Then Odin must exists.
As well as unicorns, giants, gnomes, valkyries and the other 5225478 gods that have been invented at a moment or another in History.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 09:56:18 AM

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 09:47:37 AM

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 08:41:39 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

From strict scientific views, scientists may be accurate, in both earth age and evolution. They may be totally saying that they aren't 100% sure, and that earth age and evolution are not necessarily factual.

The point is that both, earth age and evolution, are coming down to the general populace as factual. Somebody is presenting them is such a way that the populace in general will understand that they are factual. This is where the hoax lies.

Evolution is a hoax.

Regarding God, I can't be wrong about the existence of God. Why not? The fact that nobody comes even close to proving that God doesn't exist, yet many claim that God doesn't exist without proof, simply shows that they are setting themselves up as god. In fact, they might be some of the greatest god-believers, although they might mostly believe subconsciously.

The formal God believers have to go through a lot of scientific study, or they have to rely on what seems to be apparent. In their case, they are setting themselves up as gods with God... or is God setting them up gods with Himself? Psalm 82:6:

I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.'

and

John 10:34:

Quote from: BADecker on January 10, 2019, 09:47:37 AM

Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'?

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 08:41:39 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

Quote from: Astargath on January 10, 2019, 08:41:39 AM

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

I'm sorry mate but it doesn't matter if they are 100% accurate or not. No one claims that. Simply scientifically we know the age of the earth or the universe. ''it is known to not necessarily be factual'' Actually by scientific standards evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution explains the fact. So again you are wrong scientifically.

You could be wrong about god too, no? What's your point here?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

Scientific deduction is not necessarily accurate. Why not? Because many people, even scientists, suggest that scientific theories are fact, when it is only factually known that they are theories. They are known to not necessarily be fact when they are scientific theory.

Since evolution theory evolution (ETE) is known to be a scientific-theory/non-scientific-theory, it is known to not necessarily be factual... except that it is factually a theory. When it is proclaimed as fact more than factually a theory, it becomes a hoax. Since this is the way it is proclaimed - as fact beyond theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: mOgliE on January 10, 2019, 07:45:47 AM

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

Exactly, this is what they don't fucking understand, ''deduced''. No shit, everything is deduced, however there is a difference when you use the scientific method and scientific evidence. They just can't admit these things are scientifically proven right now.

ATMD

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 12

The age of the earth and universe are scientifically deduced.

Which is exactly the same thing as proven when you use scientific methology... Unless we have wrong at least one fundamental principle of radiology and physics.

There is nothing wrong with the fundamental principle of radiology and physics at all. Quite the opposite, radiology and modern physics are constantly being used in modern science, and have proven to be reliable and trustworthy. Nonetheless, to prove that something existed billions of years ago is a tough prospect. We have to make a lot of assumptions about the past. For all we know, Earth a billion years ago might be completely different to modern day Earth. Something drastic might have happened several times to speed up or slow down the decay processes, and that is already taking the assumption that we know the initial chemical properties of Earth a billion years ago.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251