Pages:
Author

Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 65. (Read 108173 times)

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
April 25, 2018, 05:11:20 PM

Talking snakes, witches and demons seem more like science fiction than evolution, though. You claim creationism is the real deal but you would have to believe in all those stories too, so tell me badecker, do talking snakes exist?

So? Start a thread.

If nothing else, the observation of billions or trillions of cause-and-effect actions that happen all around us, and the fact that we have not found even one action that we can say came about without C&E, shows that the random mutations required for evolution simply don't exist. Everything has a cause. There is no random. But if there is a random action somewhere, we have not found it amidst billions and trillions C&E actions.

Evolution theory is a fun idea. But there is no basis for it that we know about in nature and reality.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Then casino games also don't exist because they are not random either, hehehe, badecker's logic.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
April 25, 2018, 10:00:43 AM

Talking snakes, witches and demons seem more like science fiction than evolution, though. You claim creationism is the real deal but you would have to believe in all those stories too, so tell me badecker, do talking snakes exist?

So? Start a thread.

If nothing else, the observation of billions or trillions of cause-and-effect actions that happen all around us, and the fact that we have not found even one action that we can say came about without C&E, shows that the random mutations required for evolution simply don't exist. Everything has a cause. There is no random. But if there is a random action somewhere, we have not found it amidst billions and trillions C&E actions.

Evolution theory is a fun idea. But there is no basis for it that we know about in nature and reality.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
April 25, 2018, 08:44:32 AM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.

Well, it is you who are sounding more like notbatman. Consider. Are scientists people or not? If they are people, they are going to have hopes and dreams and failures and incorrectness just like people who are not scientists.

Religious people believe their religion based on things they believe. But there are some things in every religion that are truth. For example, the location of a city listed in a religious book. All religious books list something that is real and factual. The religions are the same.

Science has things that are factual, just like religion. But science has believers in things that are not known to be factual, and those believers often even know that the things that they believe in might not be factual. Sounds like religion to me.

So, when you have so-called evidence for evolution that can be better understood as adaptation, along with no proof for evolution, you have a religion called evolution... at least in the minds of those who believe in evolution.

In addition, evolution belief fits what the detailed definition of religion states. Check the whole definition at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/search?s=t and see if part of it doesn't match evolution... since there isn't any absolute fact for evolution at all.

Continue with your evolution religion if you want. It doesn't bother me at all, since it is your choice. But have a chance to wake up through the things that I am saying here.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

A hoax that has infinitely more applications than creationism which is the real, thing, right? http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA215.html

Hmm

Your link is completely theoretical. There is all kinds of idealism and hopes within it. But not of it shows even one factual thing regarding evolution. All the points within it still fit adaptation better.

Evolution is proven to be a hoax more than ever, because all attempts to show that it is not a hoax, revolve around talk rather than hard science.

Cool

I don't really understand your aversion to accept evolution, you seem perfectly fine accepting adaption but no, not evolution itself, why are you so angry about it? Is it because you think it disproves god? Many religious accept evolution and still believe in god, I'm curious what made you this angry.

What does anger have to do with accepting the truth? And why do you think that I am angry? Most people want the truth in life. So far, evolution is purely science fiction.

The science fiction novel, "Fallen Angels," was co authored by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and Michael Flynn, and published by Jim Baen - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_Angels_%28science_fiction_novel%29. But we have thousands of novelists writing and speaking about evolution as though it were a proven fact when there has never been anything in it that has been proven to be, for-a-fact, evolution.

If evolutionists said something like, "We have a good story here, it might be true but we just don't know, we'd like it to be true but there is a lot that suggests that it isn't," and other things like that, evolution would probably be acceptable. But to state that it is fact when it is far from being known to be fact, and when many other things show that it is impossible as it is theoretically stated, turns it into a lie.

Why do you like being lied to so much? Why do you like participating in a lie like evolution? Are you gaining great pleasure in seeing how far you can pull the wool over the eyes of so many people?

Evolution is a hoax, and you know it.

Cool

Talking snakes, witches and demons seem more like science fiction than evolution, though. You claim creationism is the real deal but you would have to believe in all those stories too, so tell me badecker, do talking snakes exist?
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
April 24, 2018, 12:09:00 PM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.

Well, it is you who are sounding more like notbatman. Consider. Are scientists people or not? If they are people, they are going to have hopes and dreams and failures and incorrectness just like people who are not scientists.

Religious people believe their religion based on things they believe. But there are some things in every religion that are truth. For example, the location of a city listed in a religious book. All religious books list something that is real and factual. The religions are the same.

Science has things that are factual, just like religion. But science has believers in things that are not known to be factual, and those believers often even know that the things that they believe in might not be factual. Sounds like religion to me.

So, when you have so-called evidence for evolution that can be better understood as adaptation, along with no proof for evolution, you have a religion called evolution... at least in the minds of those who believe in evolution.

In addition, evolution belief fits what the detailed definition of religion states. Check the whole definition at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/search?s=t and see if part of it doesn't match evolution... since there isn't any absolute fact for evolution at all.

Continue with your evolution religion if you want. It doesn't bother me at all, since it is your choice. But have a chance to wake up through the things that I am saying here.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

A hoax that has infinitely more applications than creationism which is the real, thing, right? http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA215.html

Hmm

Your link is completely theoretical. There is all kinds of idealism and hopes within it. But not of it shows even one factual thing regarding evolution. All the points within it still fit adaptation better.

Evolution is proven to be a hoax more than ever, because all attempts to show that it is not a hoax, revolve around talk rather than hard science.

Cool

I don't really understand your aversion to accept evolution, you seem perfectly fine accepting adaption but no, not evolution itself, why are you so angry about it? Is it because you think it disproves god? Many religious accept evolution and still believe in god, I'm curious what made you this angry.

What does anger have to do with accepting the truth? And why do you think that I am angry? Most people want the truth in life. So far, evolution is purely science fiction.

The science fiction novel, "Fallen Angels," was co authored by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and Michael Flynn, and published by Jim Baen - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_Angels_%28science_fiction_novel%29. But we have thousands of novelists writing and speaking about evolution as though it were a proven fact when there has never been anything in it that has been proven to be, for-a-fact, evolution.

If evolutionists said something like, "We have a good story here, it might be true but we just don't know, we'd like it to be true but there is a lot that suggests that it isn't," and other things like that, evolution would probably be acceptable. But to state that it is fact when it is far from being known to be fact, and when many other things show that it is impossible as it is theoretically stated, turns it into a lie.

Why do you like being lied to so much? Why do you like participating in a lie like evolution? Are you gaining great pleasure in seeing how far you can pull the wool over the eyes of so many people?

Evolution is a hoax, and you know it.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
April 24, 2018, 10:26:22 AM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.

Well, it is you who are sounding more like notbatman. Consider. Are scientists people or not? If they are people, they are going to have hopes and dreams and failures and incorrectness just like people who are not scientists.

Religious people believe their religion based on things they believe. But there are some things in every religion that are truth. For example, the location of a city listed in a religious book. All religious books list something that is real and factual. The religions are the same.

Science has things that are factual, just like religion. But science has believers in things that are not known to be factual, and those believers often even know that the things that they believe in might not be factual. Sounds like religion to me.

So, when you have so-called evidence for evolution that can be better understood as adaptation, along with no proof for evolution, you have a religion called evolution... at least in the minds of those who believe in evolution.

In addition, evolution belief fits what the detailed definition of religion states. Check the whole definition at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/search?s=t and see if part of it doesn't match evolution... since there isn't any absolute fact for evolution at all.

Continue with your evolution religion if you want. It doesn't bother me at all, since it is your choice. But have a chance to wake up through the things that I am saying here.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

A hoax that has infinitely more applications than creationism which is the real, thing, right? http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA215.html

Hmm

Your link is completely theoretical. There is all kinds of idealism and hopes within it. But not of it shows even one factual thing regarding evolution. All the points within it still fit adaptation better.

Evolution is proven to be a hoax more than ever, because all attempts to show that it is not a hoax, revolve around talk rather than hard science.

Cool

I don't really understand your aversion to accept evolution, you seem perfectly fine accepting adaption but no, not evolution itself, why are you so angry about it? Is it because you think it disproves god? Many religious accept evolution and still believe in god, I'm curious what made you this angry.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
April 24, 2018, 09:52:45 AM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.

Well, it is you who are sounding more like notbatman. Consider. Are scientists people or not? If they are people, they are going to have hopes and dreams and failures and incorrectness just like people who are not scientists.

Religious people believe their religion based on things they believe. But there are some things in every religion that are truth. For example, the location of a city listed in a religious book. All religious books list something that is real and factual. The religions are the same.

Science has things that are factual, just like religion. But science has believers in things that are not known to be factual, and those believers often even know that the things that they believe in might not be factual. Sounds like religion to me.

So, when you have so-called evidence for evolution that can be better understood as adaptation, along with no proof for evolution, you have a religion called evolution... at least in the minds of those who believe in evolution.

In addition, evolution belief fits what the detailed definition of religion states. Check the whole definition at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/search?s=t and see if part of it doesn't match evolution... since there isn't any absolute fact for evolution at all.

Continue with your evolution religion if you want. It doesn't bother me at all, since it is your choice. But have a chance to wake up through the things that I am saying here.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

A hoax that has infinitely more applications than creationism which is the real, thing, right? http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA215.html

Hmm

Your link is completely theoretical. There is all kinds of idealism and hopes within it. But not of it shows even one factual thing regarding evolution. All the points within it still fit adaptation better.

Evolution is proven to be a hoax more than ever, because all attempts to show that it is not a hoax, revolve around talk rather than hard science.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
April 23, 2018, 07:00:10 PM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.

Well, it is you who are sounding more like notbatman. Consider. Are scientists people or not? If they are people, they are going to have hopes and dreams and failures and incorrectness just like people who are not scientists.

Religious people believe their religion based on things they believe. But there are some things in every religion that are truth. For example, the location of a city listed in a religious book. All religious books list something that is real and factual. The religions are the same.

Science has things that are factual, just like religion. But science has believers in things that are not known to be factual, and those believers often even know that the things that they believe in might not be factual. Sounds like religion to me.

So, when you have so-called evidence for evolution that can be better understood as adaptation, along with no proof for evolution, you have a religion called evolution... at least in the minds of those who believe in evolution.

In addition, evolution belief fits what the detailed definition of religion states. Check the whole definition at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/search?s=t and see if part of it doesn't match evolution... since there isn't any absolute fact for evolution at all.

Continue with your evolution religion if you want. It doesn't bother me at all, since it is your choice. But have a chance to wake up through the things that I am saying here.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

A hoax that has infinitely more applications than creationism which is the real, thing, right? http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA215.html

Hmm
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
April 22, 2018, 06:09:35 PM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.

Well, it is you who are sounding more like notbatman. Consider. Are scientists people or not? If they are people, they are going to have hopes and dreams and failures and incorrectness just like people who are not scientists.

Religious people believe their religion based on things they believe. But there are some things in every religion that are truth. For example, the location of a city listed in a religious book. All religious books list something that is real and factual. The religions are the same.

Science has things that are factual, just like religion. But science has believers in things that are not known to be factual, and those believers often even know that the things that they believe in might not be factual. Sounds like religion to me.

So, when you have so-called evidence for evolution that can be better understood as adaptation, along with no proof for evolution, you have a religion called evolution... at least in the minds of those who believe in evolution.

In addition, evolution belief fits what the detailed definition of religion states. Check the whole definition at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/search?s=t and see if part of it doesn't match evolution... since there isn't any absolute fact for evolution at all.

Continue with your evolution religion if you want. It doesn't bother me at all, since it is your choice. But have a chance to wake up through the things that I am saying here.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
April 22, 2018, 05:14:14 AM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Yeah ok badecker, can you see that you sound just like notbatman? Yeah, scientists are deluding themselves. They are fabricating this hoax for some odd reason, aren't they? Belief in god among scientists exist, numbers vary 30 to even 40%. However when it comes to evolution, virtually everyone accepts it. Even your friend Coincube.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
April 21, 2018, 11:30:59 AM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.

But evolution can't be proven at all. Why? Because everything that is suggested to be evolution fits something else better, like adaptation.

What can be readily shown about evolution is, there is a bunch of talk about the fiction we know as evolution... loads of talk and writing.

In the field of evolution, it looks like scientists are rushing to delude themselves in a really firm way.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 108
April 21, 2018, 10:03:55 AM
The Theory of Evolution of Man of Charles Darwin have been widely known and deeply debated. But I think that evolution is just merely a theory. Majority of the findings are factual and accurate but not consistent. Because evidences are already there proving that evolution of man is factual. However, there are inconsistency in the results. Meaning, findings vary from one to another. If that's the case, then it would be very questionable. For example, if we, humans, evolved from monkeys, then why is it the monkeys of today do not evolve as a human being? If they tell that there are always exemption to the rules then those theory is not accepted universally.
full member
Activity: 301
Merit: 103
April 17, 2018, 01:11:41 AM
Evolution theorists are just like flat-earthers. They want to prove things that only less people believe. It's like a challenge to them and they will fight for it for the rest of their lives.


Reading all the post im 100% sure majority of you ppl didnt evolve from monkeys but are monkeys  Grin

Hard said, but a bit funny too Smiley I would use those words, doesn't mean i disagree tho!
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 15, 2018, 07:32:23 AM
Evolution theorists are just like flat-earthers. They want to prove things that only less people believe. It's like a challenge to them and they will fight for it for the rest of their lives.


Reading all the post im 100% sure majority of you ppl didnt evolve from monkeys but are monkeys  Grin
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
April 15, 2018, 07:25:21 AM
Evolution theorists are just like flat-earthers. They want to prove things that only less people believe. It's like a challenge to them and they will fight for it for the rest of their lives.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
April 15, 2018, 04:52:59 AM
Well it is a paradox. One can never prove Darwins theory but one can never dismiss it entirely. We have no proof of evolution as it takes place over thousands of years and will have to stick with the theory until we come across a better theory which explains our existence in this world.

Nothing that happened in the past and is not happen currently can be proved to an 100% degree. That being said, we can calculate fossils age, with that we can see for example, the human skull, has been evolving over time, changing, unless you concluded that somehow different humans popped into existence randomly throughout time the best explanation is that we evolved and our skulls evolved too.
newbie
Activity: 115
Merit: 0
April 15, 2018, 03:23:58 AM
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
i don't believe on evolution hoax,because I'm only believe in god, that the first man adam and eve  well be the frist created by god at the beautiful harden of eden, in my opinion evolution hoax is only theory based on science not only apply in the reality,if man came from apes or monkeys ,,why missing link are still missing Wink
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
April 15, 2018, 02:59:08 AM
No, it isn't a hoax. It's a fact. It really happened. It is the true story of life on earth, who we are, and how we got here. It's the foundation of modern biology, without which advances in many areas of human endeavor, like medicine and agriculture, would not have have been possible.
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
March 23, 2018, 04:33:41 AM
That is also my question about evolution of man that's why i don't believe it actually not just the evolution everything i believe more on religion explanation than scientific explanation about creation and evolution.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
March 20, 2018, 01:38:47 PM
The monkey question might be a little silly. But the fact that evolution is a hoax is true, and not funny at all.

Things like:
1. probability math,
2. Irreversible Complexity,
3. no beneficial mutations ever having been found, not even once,
4. no proof of missing links in the fossils,
all show that evolution is simply a hoax, used to build scientists up in the eyes of the people, so that the scientists can make money off them, one way or another.

Cool

Thanks, this sums it up pretty well. Species only adapted to their environment. No fundamental changes in the 'base' of the species are ever recorded.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
March 20, 2018, 01:28:44 PM
Wait... We evolve towards what? All the facts says we devolve - especially our average brain size.
Towards more knowledge and less superstition. What facts show we devolve? Except for religious fundamentalism. Can you provide a source for brain size claim?
Believing in the Bible literally and thinking that evolution is a hoax and that everyone else is deceived by the Devil - that makes you a fundamentalist.
The difference between you and ISIS fundamentalists is that you are peaceful and educated. Your worldview is very similar to their.

Defining aspect of evolution, as I see it, is gradual perfecting of lifeforms. One comes after the other, improved. Descendants come after their ancestors. However, it isn't always the case that the newer lifeform is more advanced. Evolution leads to many blind alleys.
Genetics shows the common origin of all lifeforms. Our genome shows our kinship to all lifeforms.

Do you know that feeling when you are somewhere between the waking state and falling asleep? You are on your bed and suddenly you twitch like you were falling somewhere? Our ancestors were sleeping on trees. Guess what can happen if you fall asleep on a tree? You can fall down. This memory is still embedded in our genes and consciousness.

Evolution is a hoax for two major reasons:
1. There is no proof of it except in the imaginations of people who want evolution proof really badly;
2. Essentially all the evidence fits adaptation or creation better... except in the imaginations of people who want evolution evidence really badly.

Evolution that is believed in is simply another religion.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool


''2. Essentially all the evidence fits adaptation or creation better... except in the imaginations of people who want evolution evidence really badly.''

Actually, almost everything evolution says it's proof against creationism:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_against_a_recent_creation

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/cre-error.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-creationists.html
Pages:
Jump to: