EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 36. | Bitcointalksearch.org

hasuof

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypper on November 14, 2017, 03:20:58 PM

Quote from: hasuof on November 14, 2017, 01:31:58 PM

i used Claymore's DualAMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.8 for ethereum mining for long time with out any issues
today i try this miner BTG-nVidia.miner.0.3.4b for bitcoin gold mining the i have the blue screen after 2 minutes mining and the pc is shutdown
i try many time and the same result

when i back to mine the ethereum Claymore's Dual its work fine

any idea please

Not too much oc? May be try dstm's miner: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-dstms-zcash-equihash-nvidia-miner-v062-linux-windows-2021765

EDIT: wait, where did you get BTG-nVidia.miner.0.3.4b?? that's not the right name for ewbf's miner. Did you download it from the first page of this thread?

no i download from another site

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: hasuof on November 14, 2017, 01:31:58 PM

i used Claymore's DualAMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.8 for ethereum mining for long time with out any issues
today i try this miner BTG-nVidia.miner.0.3.4b for bitcoin gold mining the i have the blue screen after 2 minutes mining and the pc is shutdown
i try many time and the same result

when i back to mine the ethereum Claymore's Dual its work fine

any idea please

Not too much oc? May be try dstm's miner: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-dstms-zcash-equihash-nvidia-miner-v062-linux-windows-2021765

EDIT: wait, where did you get BTG-nVidia.miner.0.3.4b?? that's not the right name for ewbf's miner. Did you download it from the first page of this thread?

hasuof

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

i used Claymore's DualAMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.8 for ethereum mining for long time with out any issues
today i try this miner BTG-nVidia.miner.0.3.4b for bitcoin gold mining the i have the blue screen after 2 minutes mining and the pc is shutdown
i try many time and the same result

when i back to mine the ethereum Claymore's Dual its work fine

any idea please

yacenty

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

all are on risers,
the 1st and 2nd are on revision 6S, 3rd one is on 7C

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: yacenty on November 14, 2017, 12:18:52 PM

no its regullar 1070 asus strix, two of them are OC, one is basic.
from time to time - last bought - 3rd card does only 50% of what 1st or 2nd card do.

Is the 3rd card on the riser? May be try to run it along in the main pci slot. Will it also misbehave?

yacenty

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

no its regullar 1070 asus strix, two of them are OC, one is basic.
from time to time - last bought - 3rd card does only 50% of what 1st or 2nd card do.

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: yacenty on November 14, 2017, 12:07:16 PM

those results are today, earlier it was 450-480.
Clocks: 1800/4200
CPU: 85%
voltage: auto - but is about 820-850mV

Nice result. They are not 1070ti, are they?
So what exactly are you not happy with? Just let it run Wink

yacenty

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

those results are today, earlier it was 450-480.
Clocks: 1800/4200
CPU: 85%
voltage: auto - but is about 820-850mV

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: yacenty on November 14, 2017, 11:29:37 AM

Hi guys,
last days I had upgrade my computer.
Till now it was e8400/4gb ram and 2 GFX 1070 cards, both from ASUS - one STRIX and one STRIX OC revision.
I get about 450-480 sols/s each card. OC was about 20sols faster.
It had 2 old style hdd.
It was powered by old psu - bequiet 450watts.

Now I have corsair CS 750M PSU
I bought next GFX 1070 Strix OC
and finally I get SSD drive - Samsung evo 850.

Just after setting up the pc the general sols/s jumped 50% which is what I expected. The third card gave me what old cards.
After test I put the pc to the wardrobe where it was before.
And I see something really confisuing me.
The newest card give me only 50% what old cards.

Code:

Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 65C
GPU0: 509 Sol/s GPU1: 508 Sol/s GPU2: 338 Sol/s
Total speed: 1355 Sol/s
INFO 17:16:37: GPU2 Accepted share 25ms [A:61, R:0]
INFO 17:16:37: GPU1 Accepted share 23ms [A:62, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 64C
GPU0: 518 Sol/s GPU1: 515 Sol/s GPU2: 329 Sol/s
Total speed: 1362 Sol/s
INFO 17:16:55: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:63, R:0]
INFO 17:16:59: GPU2 Accepted share 37ms [A:62, R:0]
INFO 17:17:10: GPU0 Accepted share 32ms [A:67, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 64C
GPU0: 515 Sol/s GPU1: 512 Sol/s GPU2: 335 Sol/s
Total speed: 1362 Sol/s
INFO 17:17:14: GPU1 Accepted share 25ms [A:64, R:0]
INFO 17:17:23: GPU2 DevFee Accepted share
INFO 17:17:32: GPU1 Accepted share 32ms [A:65, R:0]
INFO 17:17:34: GPU1 Accepted share 37ms [A:66, R:0]
INFO 17:17:40: GPU0 Accepted share 33ms [A:68, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 72C GPU2: 65C
GPU0: 513 Sol/s GPU1: 510 Sol/s GPU2: 318 Sol/s
Total speed: 1341 Sol/s
INFO: Detected new work: 78a63b3011a703331627
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 72C GPU2: 64C
GPU0: 509 Sol/s GPU1: 504 Sol/s GPU2: 333 Sol/s
Total speed: 1346 Sol/s
INFO 17:18:23: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:67, R:0]

what could be the reason?

afterburner shows same settings for all cards
Any hints how to diagnose this issue?

after few minutes I have something like that:

Code:

Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 494 Sol/s GPU1: 507 Sol/s GPU2: 534 Sol/s
Total speed: 1535 Sol/s
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 507 Sol/s GPU1: 504 Sol/s GPU2: 533 Sol/s
Total speed: 1544 Sol/s
INFO 17:25:48: GPU2 Accepted share 38ms [A:73, R:0]
INFO 17:25:53: GPU0 Accepted share 25ms [A:80, R:0]
INFO 17:25:55: GPU1 Accepted share 37ms [A:82, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 504 Sol/s GPU1: 504 Sol/s GPU2: 540 Sol/s
Total speed: 1548 Sol/s
INFO 17:26:14: GPU0 Accepted share 25ms [A:81, R:0]
INFO 17:26:15: GPU2 Accepted share 38ms [A:74, R:0]
INFO 17:26:24: GPU1 Accepted share 38ms [A:83, R:0]
INFO 17:26:31: GPU1 Accepted share 37ms [A:84, R:0]
INFO 17:26:34: GPU2 Accepted share 37ms [A:75, R:0]
INFO 17:26:43: GPU1 Accepted share 38ms [A:85, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 503 Sol/s GPU1: 497 Sol/s GPU2: 533 Sol/s
Total speed: 1533 Sol/s

so the same level for 3 cards. Any ideas? Any hints?

540 h/s from gtx 1070 - really impressive! What are you clocks if not a secret?

yacenty

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Hi guys,
last days I had upgrade my computer.
Till now it was e8400/4gb ram and 2 GFX 1070 cards, both from ASUS - one STRIX and one STRIX OC revision.
I get about 450-480 sols/s each card. OC was about 20sols faster.
It had 2 old style hdd.
It was powered by old psu - bequiet 450watts.

Now I have corsair CS 750M PSU
I bought next GFX 1070 Strix OC
and finally I get SSD drive - Samsung evo 850.

Just after setting up the pc the general sols/s jumped 50% which is what I expected. The third card gave me what old cards.
After test I put the pc to the wardrobe where it was before.
And I see something really confisuing me.
The newest card give me only 50% what old cards.

Code:

Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 65C
GPU0: 509 Sol/s GPU1: 508 Sol/s GPU2: 338 Sol/s
Total speed: 1355 Sol/s
INFO 17:16:37: GPU2 Accepted share 25ms [A:61, R:0]
INFO 17:16:37: GPU1 Accepted share 23ms [A:62, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 64C
GPU0: 518 Sol/s GPU1: 515 Sol/s GPU2: 329 Sol/s
Total speed: 1362 Sol/s
INFO 17:16:55: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:63, R:0]
INFO 17:16:59: GPU2 Accepted share 37ms [A:62, R:0]
INFO 17:17:10: GPU0 Accepted share 32ms [A:67, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 64C
GPU0: 515 Sol/s GPU1: 512 Sol/s GPU2: 335 Sol/s
Total speed: 1362 Sol/s
INFO 17:17:14: GPU1 Accepted share 25ms [A:64, R:0]
INFO 17:17:23: GPU2 DevFee Accepted share
INFO 17:17:32: GPU1 Accepted share 32ms [A:65, R:0]
INFO 17:17:34: GPU1 Accepted share 37ms [A:66, R:0]
INFO 17:17:40: GPU0 Accepted share 33ms [A:68, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 72C GPU2: 65C
GPU0: 513 Sol/s GPU1: 510 Sol/s GPU2: 318 Sol/s
Total speed: 1341 Sol/s
INFO: Detected new work: 78a63b3011a703331627
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 72C GPU2: 64C
GPU0: 509 Sol/s GPU1: 504 Sol/s GPU2: 333 Sol/s
Total speed: 1346 Sol/s
INFO 17:18:23: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:67, R:0]

what could be the reason?

afterburner shows same settings for all cards
Any hints how to diagnose this issue?

after few minutes I have something like that:

Code:

Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 494 Sol/s GPU1: 507 Sol/s GPU2: 534 Sol/s
Total speed: 1535 Sol/s
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 507 Sol/s GPU1: 504 Sol/s GPU2: 533 Sol/s
Total speed: 1544 Sol/s
INFO 17:25:48: GPU2 Accepted share 38ms [A:73, R:0]
INFO 17:25:53: GPU0 Accepted share 25ms [A:80, R:0]
INFO 17:25:55: GPU1 Accepted share 37ms [A:82, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 504 Sol/s GPU1: 504 Sol/s GPU2: 540 Sol/s
Total speed: 1548 Sol/s
INFO 17:26:14: GPU0 Accepted share 25ms [A:81, R:0]
INFO 17:26:15: GPU2 Accepted share 38ms [A:74, R:0]
INFO 17:26:24: GPU1 Accepted share 38ms [A:83, R:0]
INFO 17:26:31: GPU1 Accepted share 37ms [A:84, R:0]
INFO 17:26:34: GPU2 Accepted share 37ms [A:75, R:0]
INFO 17:26:43: GPU1 Accepted share 38ms [A:85, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 76C GPU1: 73C GPU2: 68C
GPU0: 503 Sol/s GPU1: 497 Sol/s GPU2: 533 Sol/s
Total speed: 1533 Sol/s

so the same level for 3 cards. Any ideas? Any hints?

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: sublimus on November 14, 2017, 12:45:25 AM

Quote from: gurupool on November 13, 2017, 09:22:28 PM

EWBF is tested on our Bitcoin Gold Mining Pool: https://gpool.guru. Have fun!

The problem is to get a reliable BTG wallet. I am waiting for Trezor to implement one.

Getting a BTG wallet is a real pain in the arse as those wallets advertised on the BTG official website do not really support BTG.
There is however a simple solution: mine on suprnova - you don't need a wallet for mining (just an account); later when you get your trezor wallet you can transfer your BTG from suprnova. That's what I'm doing while I'm waiting for ledger wallet to come up with BTG support.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 12, 2017, 04:06:42 PM

I know my GPU is kinda old...but why would it crash

Your GPU may not support a recent-enough CUDA compute version to work with EWBF.

sublimus

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 100

Quote from: gurupool on November 13, 2017, 09:22:28 PM

EWBF is tested on our Bitcoin Gold Mining Pool: https://gpool.guru. Have fun!

The problem is to get a reliable BTG wallet. I am waiting for Trezor to implement one.

jpl

member

Activity: 154

Merit: 11

Quote from: gurupool on November 13, 2017, 09:22:28 PM

EWBF is tested on our Bitcoin Gold Mining Pool: https://gpool.guru. Have fun!

Pretty cool! Thanks for sharing. I just need another 50 miners to compete! lol

gurupool

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

EWBF is tested on our Bitcoin Gold Mining Pool: https://gpool.guru. Have fun!

sublimus

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 100

Quote from: tangonaboat on November 13, 2017, 12:37:02 PM

Hi all, is there a reason as to why my browser blocks downloads of from EWBF except for 0.0.9 and older versions of the software?

older version were not added to virus definition databases.

tangonaboat

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Hi all, is there a reason as to why my browser blocks downloads of from EWBF except for 0.0.9 and older versions of the software?

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 13, 2017, 11:13:55 AM

Quote from: crypper on November 13, 2017, 09:39:01 AM

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 13, 2017, 08:39:47 AM

Quote from: sublimus on November 12, 2017, 10:37:01 PM

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 12, 2017, 04:06:42 PM

I know my GPU is kinda old...but why would it crash

Does anyone else use GTX645?

THIS IS BEST SCREENSHOT I COULD GET BEFORE CRASHING!
MINIMAL BAT EDIT, UP TO DATE DRIVERS

I think the latest ver. is not suitable for older cards. You need to try an earlier version where those older GPUs were supported.
Unfortunatly devs are not so good (or interested) at implementing guides for their softwares as they are for coding them so it is hard
to tell you which version you need to use.

That's flippin sad Sad

Thanks, ill go n look for older builds

Just out of curiosity, what kind of hash rate and power consumption do you expect from GTX 645?

I dont know, something...anything!
No shamin please...i cant afford buying GPUs on a whim like everyone else!

Can't find any reported hash rate for GTX645 for equihash, can only find it for blake265 (84 MH/s). So you might be the first one to try it. However assuming that hash rates for GTX 645 and GTX 1060 are proportional for different algos we get:
GTX 1060
   blake256 -- 1800 MH/s
   equihash -- 270 H/s
GTX 645
   blake256 -- 84 MH/s
   equihash -- proportionally would be 12.6 H/s
Now assuming that you have free electricity, we are looking at ~ $21.5 per year.
Have fun.

noobwhosuckatlife

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 101

Quote from: crypper on November 13, 2017, 09:39:01 AM

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 13, 2017, 08:39:47 AM

Quote from: sublimus on November 12, 2017, 10:37:01 PM

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 12, 2017, 04:06:42 PM

I know my GPU is kinda old...but why would it crash

Does anyone else use GTX645?

THIS IS BEST SCREENSHOT I COULD GET BEFORE CRASHING!
MINIMAL BAT EDIT, UP TO DATE DRIVERS

I think the latest ver. is not suitable for older cards. You need to try an earlier version where those older GPUs were supported.
Unfortunatly devs are not so good (or interested) at implementing guides for their softwares as they are for coding them so it is hard
to tell you which version you need to use.

That's flippin sad Sad

Thanks, ill go n look for older builds

Just out of curiosity, what kind of hash rate and power consumption do you expect from GTX 645?

I dont know, something...anything!
No shamin please...i cant afford buying GPUs on a whim like everyone else!

crypper

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 12

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 13, 2017, 08:39:47 AM

Quote from: sublimus on November 12, 2017, 10:37:01 PM

Quote from: noobwhosuckatlife on November 12, 2017, 04:06:42 PM

I know my GPU is kinda old...but why would it crash

Does anyone else use GTX645?

THIS IS BEST SCREENSHOT I COULD GET BEFORE CRASHING!
MINIMAL BAT EDIT, UP TO DATE DRIVERS

I think the latest ver. is not suitable for older cards. You need to try an earlier version where those older GPUs were supported.
Unfortunatly devs are not so good (or interested) at implementing guides for their softwares as they are for coding them so it is hard
to tell you which version you need to use.

That's flippin sad Sad

Thanks, ill go n look for older builds

Just out of curiosity, what kind of hash rate and power consumption do you expect from GTX 645?

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 36. (Read 2164326 times)