People were still talking about using Mssi in the next World Cup in 2026 and they think Argantina will fail without Messi but that's wrong and it seems from what I can see that Argantina can even have a good performance if they don't have Mess in the team. However, this can be challenging for them but they have been using this player for years.
But in the game between El Salvador and Argentina, we saw a good performance in Argentina and they played without Messi but still, they won the game with a 3-0 result.
Messi was absent because he was injured when he was playing for Inter Miami. The next game for Argantina will be agagsit Costa Rica.
friendly games are completely different from real games, in friendly games players don't take themselves seriously, they save themselves a lot to avoid injuries, that's why someone uses friendly games as a reference that a certain team has improved a lot or can play well without a certain player, and a big mistake. look at the friendly games that many teams played before the last world cup and see that many teams like Brazil had good results in the friendlies before the last world cup and people were even talking a lot about Brazil being champions like they are doing now In this thread they only talk about Brazil, and France didn't have good results in friendly games, but when it came to the serious games, the cup games it was visible as Brazil was nothing, it was a weak team
while Argentina had good results in the friendly games before the World Cup without Di Maria and Messi, during the serious games, the World Cup games it was clear that without Messi and Di Maria Argentina were not strong in attack, even in the game. in the final against France, Argentina was strong while it had Messi and Di Maria, but when Argentina's coach removed Di Maria, Argentina fell a lot and France dominated the game to the point of drawing and then France came very close to winning the The game is all the fault of the Argentine coach who wanted the team to start adapting with younger players in that position.
By this I mean that teams cannot be in a rush to place young players while they have good players who are a certain age but who play much better and perform very well. In the case of Messi, he is a player with a much bigger and better vision of the field, he is not just an attacking player, he can make assists for players better positioned on the field, he can position himself better on the field, in other words Even though Messi is at that age, he is still Argentina's best option in serious games, and Messi is not very old, Messi is 36 years old, he can still play in the next World Cup and perform well