I keep hearing that this or that country is not great in football because they don't have enough money.
In reality, there are examples of countries that are great in football and are very poor, Brazil being the most extreme case. Many of the players in Brazil grew up playing football without shoes, and even without food some days. Still, Brazil is the most successful country in the World Cup history.
Most South American teams share a similar story.
So, there is the proof that you don't need money to be the best in football
I am not sure about this. Brazil is a relatively prosperous nation, at least when compared to Asian and African nations. But it is true that there are quite a few informal settlements in Brazil (known as Favelas, with a total population of close to 11-12 million spread across 6,000+ localities), where the living standards are too low. But these sort of ghettoes can be found even in developed nations such as the United States and France. That doesn't mean that those who live there face too many obstacles in developing their game.
What makes football in Brazil great even though it is categorized as a poor country is, they are poor economically but they are very advanced in football. I think it is not suitable when Brazil's poverty is used as a reference as a poor country that is advanced in football. You can see that clubs in Brazil's top league often win the Libertadores and are often finalists in the Club World Cup. This means they have everything in football. At least Brazil has many talent scouts from various clubs or even from Europe, unlike countries in Asia and Africa where it is very difficult to penetrate the national level due to the lack of football facilities in those countries.
I once heard someone who said the following: when a person practices a certain thing a lot, that person achieves perfection. In Brazil people love football, even in places where there is no great luxury or conditions for playing football, people play football, this means that children start playing football from a very early age, which means that many people fill the stadiums football team to watch the games. The quality of league games is very good, reaching the point where even at the lowest levels there is a very good level of talent. This doesn't happen in the USA for example, how many neighborhoods and streets do we see children constantly playing football in the United States?
There are few places in the USA where you will see children playing, young people playing football, but when you look at basketball, then the situation is different, you will see someone playing basketball in every neighborhood. At most, I saw that there is a lot of football played in some neighborhoods, but I didn't have the opportunity to see if at all levels of football the stadiums have a lot of people, the same goes for Canada. but when we look at England, Germany, Italy, France we will see that when a small team plays and even if it is a team from the lowest bracket, there are people watching and the level of quality of play is very good.
When a government pays attention to sport, then sport will evolve a lot, but this same government must not put politics in sport, let the private sector take care of sport. Sport is a business in today's world and in that market and they need to have freedom. in Africa and even in South America, many governments control sport a lot and put politics in football to the point that club leaders have to be people from the political party that governs the country and in this way the leagues do not have attention and are without quality