Topic: Final capitulation crash incoming, drop your bags & hope now! - page 4. (Read 12862 times)
Does anyone that posts the bubble graph actually fucking look at the thing? BTC should of hit $50 in feb according to that thing. it makes no sense to post it.
A big crash in the price of bitcoin is only bad for sellers. For buyers it's a great thing. I would love to see a 50% OFF bitcoin sale!
It's also bad for those holding the investment. What if we hit that 50% off, you going to buy? What if it hits 50% on its way to $0.10, then what, was that a great request/move? How are you going to know if it's a permanent or temporary drop? Further, the notion of price dropping for "cheaper" coins is assinine because it shakes the confidence in the market that you then hope will restore it to pre 50% sale prices.
A big crash in the price of bitcoin is only bad for sellers. For buyers it's a great thing. I would love to see a 50% OFF bitcoin sale!
On another note, I bet dumbshit Dump3r has some great input, it's a shame I've had that clown on ignore since the first time I saw it post.
The only clown you are, you little trollshit hunter. A moving puppet in the hand of trolls ;-)
Keep me better on ignore. If I would troll you hard, all day and all night, you would be writing your walls of text addressed to my troll-ass
Probabilities are derived from data and statistical analysis. Care to post your work leading you to "see[ing] a high probability"? I can cherry pick graphs too, maybe I should go find some that show a rocket about to be launched and post them here claiming "high probability".
On another note, I bet dumbshit Dump3r has some great input, it's a shame I've had that clown on ignore since the first time I saw it post.
Prove it with logic and examples, or are you the next Falllling? You can't just post random circles on random graphs and make stupid claims or you're just another nay-sayer fool.
Anatomy Of A Bubble.
I see a high probability of a downward trend occurring. It looks very similar.
Prove it with logic and examples, or are you the next Falllling? You can't just post random circles on random graphs and make stupid claims or you're just another nay-sayer fool.
Are you upset?
Prove it with logic and examples, or are you the next Falllling? You can't just post random circles on random graphs and make stupid claims or you're just another nay-sayer fool.
So Bitcoin has had one, no two, wait three, four dot-com bubbles now?
It also had many bubbles...
The dot-com bubble was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000 with a climax in 2000.
Bitcoin is like dot-com in fast forward mode. Events which used to take years to unfold happens in the matter of months or even weeks over here. Good thing too as everybody is so much more impatient these days.
Speed of information and communication have increased many times over the decade. And price will react accordingly.
This is not FUD but reality.
We are here:
We are here:
I do agree.
lol the course i random , you can't really predict it, just because two small segment look the same doesn't mean that their continuation will be too
Yeah, and you're trying to imply that as far as the market goes, that's it, kaboom, never recovered, still in shambles to this day.
I never said that.
The reality is that the NASDAQ is currently sitting at 86.3% of it's "dot-com bubble" ATH and on its way up.
Stocks often win in the long term, no problem with that, but it took 10 years to recover (and just recover) from the crash in 2000, 10 years! It's a decade.
Time is as precious as money and perhaps more.
The dot-com bubble was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000 with a climax in 2000.
Yeah, and you're trying to imply that as far as the market goes, that's it, kaboom, never recovered, still in shambles to this day.
The reality is that the NASDAQ is currently sitting at 86.3% of it's "dot-com bubble" ATH and on its way up.
Wait a minute, so what you're saying is that Bitcoin should start grinding up to $1035.6/BTC? My bad, I thought you were being a troll bear, not a troll bull.
So Bitcoin has had one, no two, wait three, four dot-com bubbles now?
It also had many bubbles...
The dot-com bubble was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000 with a climax in 2000.
Bitcoin is like dot-com in fast forward mode. Events which used to take years to unfold happens in the matter of months or even weeks over here. Good thing too as everybody is so much more impatient these days.
So Bitcoin has had one, no two, wait three, four dot-com bubbles now?
It also had many bubbles...
The dot-com bubble was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000 with a climax in 2000.
i see, end of BTC maybee?
Yep, that's the pattern that signals end.
Sell everything!!
Can do with a crash now, starting to get bored again. A drop to 500 would work nicely for me, but I will take even a 550.
The crash won't happen simply because the value has already crashed, now we are at the start of a new rally waiting for the spark which will trigger the rise.
It looks like the DotCom-bubble...
http://www.todovaacambiar.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Internet-bubble.gif
http://www.todovaacambiar.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Internet-bubble.gif
So Bitcoin has had
So Octavius must be the next cosmofly/falllling account. Thanks for the early heads up.
PS: The current Nasdaq CCMP is 4,355.05, over double what you show at the end of your little kid graph there. Please try to keep up.
Bitcoin has matured since then, and the market is now saturated, more or less. Sometime this fall we might see a temporary price increase to $700, but we won't go much higher than that.
It looks like the DotCom-bubble...
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. In 2013, Willy and Karpeles were still actively manipulating the price.
Bitcoin has matured since then, and the market is now saturated, more or less. Sometime this fall we might see a temporary price increase to $700 [...]
Bitcoin has matured since then, and the market is now saturated, more or less. Sometime this fall we might see a temporary price increase to $700 [...]
That's just, like, your opinion man.
Turns out that the "Willy bot" may actually have been a bot created by Mt. Gox for the Exante Fund. How about that eh?
Personally I don't subscribe to the Willy bot BS. I believe China led that train and lil' ol Willy had nothing to do with that.
Quote
[...] but we won't go much higher than that.
Until when?
Oh, and as for the part where state "market is now saturated"... Treating variables as constants in dangerous
Jump to: