just to support and defend a bit griffith
this time the wallet download from chris did give me the warning maybe dangerous download.......
but i still use the wallet from chris because 32bit use less ram
its the usual crap that cryptowallet get often wrong dedected false positives
what i suggest is that u have at least two different virtual maschines to run ur wallets in
one high secure for the real big investments
and one for the rest
where fly i consider "the rest"
this way u really big investments can get never affected
i run like 15 POS coins and if i would get paranoia each false positive i wouldnt be able to sleep
I have tested much another POS wallets with the online virus scanner. I have not found a similar report. I think it is possible that grifti works with an infected system or firewall etc. But false positive is possible. If we find a wallet with similar report is it a false positive to 99%.
the only wallets that did do damage that i know where by the dev manipulated
like the luckysomethingcoin that did create the backdoor to hack cryptsy via IRC
even a infected system can hardly include his infection into a wallet building process in a way that it could harm people who use the wallet
it would have to change wallet code in a way that it utilize new codeparts
no virus i know would be able do this
only a human could by intention include malware in a wallet in a way that it can create harm
