Hi LoyceV, thank you for your input and suggestions.
We have relayed them to the development team and will look into them. It should be said that we are currently working on a new version of the website.
As for KYC icons, those exchangers that do not have "verification" icon next to them usually do not require verification. The key word here is "usually". You can read in our FAQ, the answer to the question
"Is goind through AML/KYC procedures required in exchangers listed on BestChange" is
Despite exchangers listed on BestChange not always have a special icon indicating the necessity of verification, a lot of them are obliged to comply with AML/KYC requirements according to which the client can be required to provide a set of documents shall his/her transaction deem suspicious. We advise you to carefully study the terms of service of the selected exchanger. AML/KYC policy is in line with international practices for combating money laundering. Exchangers listed on BestChange use these procedures to comply with AML/KYC requirements and not to abuse customer data or misappropriate their funds.But it should be noted, that the exchanger with the "verification" icon require KYC in any case, whereas those that don't have this icon would require it in extraordinary cases. The idea to sort exchangers based on this criteria has been also relayed to the team.
Can you add the option to choose the amount to trade, then sort based on that? Because of the differences between network transaction fees and exchange fees, sorting based on a 1 BTC trade is likely to give a different suggestion than sorting based on a 0.002 BTC trade.
It would be great to be able to enter the amount to trade, and get a comparison based on that.
If we get you right, the Calculator function should be able to solve this question: simply select the "Calculator" over the table of exchangers and enter the amount you are interested in (either in giving or receiving) and the list will be sorted based on that amount.
Thank you again for all your ideas and valuable input!