If the winnings from the bugged game were removed, and the bug bounty was added to the OP's account, he would have sufficient funds to cover the bet that resulted in his jackpot win, and as such, I believe there is a strong argument he should receive the entire jackpot win.
look, this is impossible, The bug bounty was issued only after seizing the jackpot winnings, what obviously means that firstly jackpot was won using the bug money, than the winning was seized and only after the bounty was given. I will upload another screen from our back office (information hidden are usernames of other players affected by bug and given bounty as well)
The bounty was raised only after my involvement to 0.2 adding 0.12 to players account, this is the moment when I thought we were settling and raised bug bounty because player was in rare rage and really felt bad for him and situation was delicate as well.
Hope this is the last one on this topic, we are open to make more files public, that guided us to the decision and is interesting for community.
Cheers,
David.
I was under the impression the OP was eligible for the bug bounty from reading this
reddit thread, but it looks like that bounty only applied to PLINKO and MINES, not the game in question.
The delay in adjusting the OP's account is still concerning because the OP was under the impression his balance was higher than it was, and likely made larger bets accordingly. This effectively guarantees a player will either lose their entire deposit or will have any winnings clawed back, effectively making any bets by the player risk free to the casino.
It continues to be my position that FJ should payout a minimum of what was described
here by MadZ (and agreeing with his logic).
Given that the OP has shown to frequent your casino, it is reasonable to say he would have gambled absent the win via the bugged game.