Topic: FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC🏎Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest - page 43. (Read 405317 times)

提供比特幣簽名找奎因

Hi, buddy, I can't login my account, my account is [email protected], and click reset my password, I can't receive e-mail in gmail box or spam, what I can do next?

you will can acces your account, i hope... 



>>>

____
_
_>>  im blocked on your FaceBook Oficial page!!!   WHY???   because i share my link there??  or  other one??? was much time to find your official facebook page...>>   ((facebook com/theofficialfreebitco in/)) Free Bitcoin😢🤔😟😕😭   @theofficialfreebitco.in   >>>

所以開放讓我收密碼重置信
So let me receive the password reset letter

Hello TheQuin


I received  Dogecoin to my wallet. Only a month has passed since you tell the management approach. I'm so glad it's like a Christmas gift.

Thank you

How can I be sure what you are asking?


I only ever ban accounts for violating our Terms of Service. This account is not banned.


So I have no idea why you can't just log in.

我怎麼確定
How can i be sure
之前你也是封了有很多人的帳號搞的那些人都要提告
Before, you also blocked the accounts of many people. Those who do have to sue
而且我的郵件地址還是可以收信沒有被盜帳號
And my email address can still receive mail without a stolen account

You originally said you were having problems accessing your email account. If you are having problems with emails getting blocked by Hotmail you will have to contact them about it.


Nothing is blocked or can be blocked on your freebitco.in account.

[/quote]
Are you going to eat up the money in my account?
[/quote]

No. It is going to sit there in the balance until you log in again.

沒有啊我還能收信只是會被垃圾郵件擋住
No, I can still receive emails, but I will be blocked by spam
怎麼可以私自封我帳號
How can I block my account privately
難道打算把我帳號裡的錢吃掉嗎
Are you going to eat up the money in my account?

Because you said you have lost access to your email account.

為什麼無法再寄重置密碼信了
Why can't I send a password reset letter anymore

Every example you give is useless. I answered the one example you gave in that post. I also note that you don't even admit that you were completely wrong in that example. You have just told me that I should accept evidence that anyone with a primitive understanding of how web browsers work could fake up in 5 minutes and then you still expect to be taken seriously.


We value our customers' privacy and don't log anything other than the last IP used. If the account has already been hacked that will be the hacker's IP.


We value our customers' privacy and don't log anything other than the last fingerprint used. If the account has already been hacked that will be the hacker's fingerprint.


If the account has already been hacked that will be the hacker's location.


If the account has already been hacked the hacker will have access to that information.


If the account has already been hacked the hacker will have access to that information.


There is no point in asking any of that because none of it verifies who was the ORIGINAL owner of the account. In situations like this, it is quite common for someone that gets their email hacked and it is used to access their freebitco.in account. The original owner sees what's going on and is able to lock the hacker out of both. Then the hacker will have gained all the knowledge above and use that to try and phish the account from me.

I have had inactive customers that were unaware their account had been more than 2 years ago and someone else had been using it to collect their referral commissions and play. They were able to get their account back by proving they owned addresses they deposited from 6 years ago. I am not going to rely on anything you suggest above because it proves absolutely about nothing who is the original owner.

tn00739338 said that their email account had been banned. What if tn00739338 hacked that email and used it to access the freebitco.in account? Then Hotmail locked that email because it was hacked. All of your suggestions are telling me to just believe the last person to access that account. I'm not putting myself in the situation where I'm making a judgment call, like you are, about whether I believe them or not. I'm insisting on real proof of original ownership.


No. You are definitely talking about yourself here. However many times I explain to you that all the things you keep telling me I should do would put our customers at risk of phishing and ruin our reputation you just keep repeating them.


The first job wetsuit gave me was just to be forum representative. I used to come here and defend the site just because I liked it. When some numbskull like you came along and refused to accept that they are wrong I took the piss out of them and encouraged them to make even more of a fool of themselves just like you are doing now. My knowledge and ability to win the argument every time and show up the twat attacking us by making it obvious to anyone reading it that they haven't got a clue what they are talking about is what got me the job.

I got promoted to support because wetsuit saw that I have a good understanding of the business and how it works from suggestions I gave him and opinions I gave on his ideas. He also appreciated that I have many years of experience of high level IT support in the investment banking industry. The skills required to deal with awkward customers on the trading floors of the City of London and Wall Street are very similar to those required at a casino. Rule one is never to take shit from anyone. This isn't MacDonalds where staff have to smile at obnoxious customers. In these types of businesses, you earn respect from the people who matter by standing up for yourself. Nobody is ever going to bully me into handing over an account without the 100% proof that only a Bitcoin signed message can provide. That's why I'm trusted to do this job and you never would be.

---

The answer hasn't changed. A Bitcoin signed message from an address previously linked to the account is the only form of proof of ownership that can be verified with 100% certanty.


I hope that you will learn from your mistakes and take the appropriate measures to secure your accounts in the future. If you don't enable 2fa and then lose access to your email you will lock yourself out of your account. If you don't use your own Bitcoin wallet to deposit from or set as your address in your profile you'll have no way of recovering from those errors.

I can provide transaction serial number verification
我能提供交易序號查證
I feel that it was very simple to deposit bitcoin at the beginning, but it would be deliberately made things difficult to get it out, and the customer service was very insincere to help solve the problem.
感覺當初存比特幣很簡單但領出來都會被刻意刁難而且客服很沒誠意幫忙解決問題

You have a major comprehension deficiency. What I said is that I have experience and knowledge of this subject where you have none.


I recommended that all of our customers use 2fa because in the event of them losing access to their email account they will be able to change their email. You decided you knew better and contradicted me.


I asked for the only thing that I can verify with 100% certainty that hasn't been faked. Have you ever heard of something called a browser console? If you knew how to use one you could make any website in the world display anything you want. You could even make a video of it to fool people. Yet again you have demonstrated that you don't even have the most basic understanding about this to make any judgment about how I should do my job.


Yes. When you combine that with failing to enable 2fa, failing to set a recovery phone number, failing to set your default withdrawal address to your own wallet and then getting your email account banned it results in you locking yourself out of your account.


Everyone has the right to express their views as much as I have a right to reply point out why they are wrong. When someone doesn't agree and just starts posting large red font it shows they think they can win an argument by shouting louder than the other person. I'm going to point that they are immature twat to them.
When some gormless idiot comes here and criticises what I'm doing then defending myself and our site is being "triggered". I'm not trying to stop you, I'm just rebutting your pathetic and misguided opinions. You'll stop of your own accord eventually. Probably because you just get bored of wasting your time repeating the same failed arguments. You might even have half a brain cell and be able to work out why you are wrong, but that is unlikely. I'll still be here every day correcting any nonsense that's posted here because that's part of my job.


I have already demonstrated to you that this has nothing to do with language difficulty. The rest of that shows yet again how clueless you are to this business.

That's because you have a habit of making judgments about things you don't know about.


Because I was talking to you and you have the delusion that using 2fa on YOUR Gmail account will secure your other accounts.


All he could send me from that account is a screenshot of an alleged transaction. We are not a KYC site so we don't know any personal information about the original owner. That's why we need proof in a different form than a KYC site would.


I'm waiting for the real owner to either authorise his login from his email account (that this person doesn't have access to now) or someone to provide a Bitcoin signed message from an address previously linked to the account.



Your use of juvenile BBcode formatting is nobodies fault but your own. I'm not listening because what you say is bollox. Highlighting it just makes you look like you're desperate for someone to take notice of you.


I'm making fun of you because you are being an idiot. You can't understand that having this procedure in place to protect our high rollers accounts is one of the many things that has contributed to our success over the last 8 years. Some customers deposit and gable with millions of dollars. Some of them have sought reassurance from me that their accounts are safe from phishing. When I explain our policies they are happy.
I'm not listening to you because you are completely clueless on the subject. The level of arrogance you have to think you can tell me how we should do things is astounding.
I'm not going to listen to you because you have zero experience or knowledge of the subject.


This policy was first implemented by wetsuit when he opened the site in 2013. He asked me to continue implementing it when he promoted me from forum representative to support just over 3 years ago. Since then I have been dealing with this kind of thing every single day. The experience of doing that makes me 100% certain that wesuit has got this policy right. Using large red fonts doesn't add any weight to your arguments it just makes you look like an ignorant prick.

tl;dr There's nothing you can say that will convince me that wetsuit has been doing this all wrong for the last 8 years.

It's not true. Having knowledge gained from hacking someone's email account isn't equivalent to being able to provide a Bitcoin signed message. I don't hand over accounts to anyone who asks just because they can demonstrate a little knowledge of an accounts history and can produce a photoshop of an exchange statement. I need something that I'm 100% certain isn't faked. I can verify that with a Bitcoin signed message from an address previously linked to the account and nothing else.
I don't benefit from funds in that account because they have to remain there waiting for the real owner to come back.

---

Don't worry about idiots like this. I have already answered all his complaints but rather than actually try to understand the reasons we protect our customers from phishing in this way he just repeats himself. There is no reasoning with someone who refuses to listen.

---

That's funny. Your idea of being done with this conversation is to switch to kindergarten mode with large coloured fonts. What happened? Does your nappy need changing and you are desperate for some attention? I'm not going to waste my time answering that infantile tirade because it's clear to anyone with any basic knowledge that I've already explained it in full.

This procedure has been in place since 2013 and it isn't going to change because of some needy idiot who can't understand it spamming the thread in red.

This is worth repeating:

I'll prioritse keeping my high rollers' happy by ensuring their accounts are secure over dimwits who don't even use 2fa or a Bitcoin wallet every time.

So true