Topic: [FUN] Is DdmrDdmr even human? (Read 9957 times)

Things come and go.
It's challenging to be consistent on the forum, and yours truly has been quite aware of this (hint: 534).
Often, this is not possible for the greater good of more important things.
Time is a scarce resource, even more scarce than Bitcoin.
The important thing is that he is fine!

If he's not active as regular then it's assumed that he is cooking something big out there to come back or maybe he might be busy in real life as I believe everyone has their personal problems to face including you and I. If I have important thing to sort out there I wouldn't be that active relating them here than handling them before coming back online to continue every other activities I might seems to hold here. I just hope he is fine out there.

I am also concerned about this. There is no fun any more. Three and a half months without merit spree?

It's a shame because it's not just that, he doesn't write as much, he doesn't give as many merits, he's not as active on the forum anymore. On the bright side, he maintains a certain amount of activity, because others just disappear and we don't hear from them anymore.

I am pretty confident about how he does it.
But this is far beyond the scope of this thread.
And I don't want to spoil the fund of everyone indulging in very boring technical stuff on hot to GET merit sent to the right post.
If you want to know more, try summoning @DdmrDdmr on this thread and explaining how he performs his magic.

Have also been wondering how he does it, though have no power to question about his spree. But just to get good post on the pipeline, as you said didn't you think he already selected post to spree maybe who knows and i don't know how he does that.

Don’t worry.
The old Spanish bull is still fighting in the plaza, and he will soon be back with a gargantuan merits spree.
Have your good posts ready by then.

However, this is a semi-serious post, so we are not here to question his mediating habits but to rejoice in his generosity!

fillippone - this thread has been inactive for a while - has DdmrDdmr changed his Merit Spree habits over time?
This thread was last active on July 22, 2024, 04:49:09 PM - mainly because of your reply post. Based on my search of DdmrDdmr profile - he last did it on June 09, 2024 between 05:12:27 PM and 05:33:39 PM - after that his merit posting activity went back to normal like most other merit source.

I miss him and hope he doesn't forget to scratch some of my posts with some of his merit - LOL.

Somebody is cooking on the Spanish board:




Here, the battle between the old beast and the new kid in town.
The battle is fierce. Maybe the result will be the bull being “indultato”… or he might horn the torero in a last run.

Let's see if our dear bot gets his act together, as he has competition:



Between the summer and the fact that he doesn't participate in campaigns, he doesn't post much, he doesn't spend so much time on the forum and therefore doesn't give as many merits.

If he keeps like this I think paxmao is going to eat his cake.

I am horrendously late reviewing this, but I will come with a couple of bonus on that.


Official @ddmrddmr thread



First, the usual the usual spreadsheet, where you see the two last sprees:



According to the total merits per pair of TICK-TOCK sprees, this is the new (lower) record since its inception, beating the already small number of last month.

I can definitely say that @ddmrddmr has become more efficient at distributing merits in the traditional way, so his "automated" runs are becoming smaller and smaller.

---

Merit Spree #55 by @ddmrddrmr

Official Description:


My review:


TICK: An incredibly fast paced merit spree: 3.33 merits per secondo is definitely a record for the merit spree analysis, and I guess record overall.
The relatively small number of merits helped attaining  an high sustained rate, without getting blocked by proxies.

Smallest on record, sheer efficiency, ultra condensed beauty

Here's the TOP10:


Compared to Merit Spree #53, the numbers to enter the TOP10 is quite low, given the number of merited profiles. Only 2 merits to enter the chart, topped yet another time by @d5000, once more time topping the chart with the 26 merits, getting just shy of his record of 30 in merits spree #47.

That's all folks for Merits Spree 55!

---

Merit Spree #56 by @ddmrddrmr

Official description:


My review:

TOCK This second spree was again the smallest of the bunch, right smaller than #52. For the first time, the spree TICK and the spree TOCK had roughly the same number of TXs. This spree was a "single one", as you can see from the spreadsheet and the chart of the most merited users,

Here's the TOP10:


Being a single merits spree, numbers are lower: 3 merits to top the chart and 2 to enter the TOP10.
Paid2 for once is not even in the top10, which is topped by Teymos, cyan and Adiljutt156.
 
I will start getting merit statistics for a single merits spree! So 11 merits are the highest on record for a single merits spree! (merit spree 44!), and these 3 merits are the lowest required on the record, together with spree #44, #46 and #48, #51: wen two?

---

Bonus number one:
I decided to thank ddmrddmr for his continuous effort in the merit distribution:
I will keep the number of merits awarded to his thread on par with the merit spree:



I have some room left!

---

During the pizza contest, two users showered merits on participants.
Here how their efforts compares to the one of our Spanish AI:




Loyce Merited 8 merits for the vast majority of users, with some exceptions, I won't report here not to influence anyone.
Same diet ABCBits.

You can clearly see how difficult is to efficiently perform a merit distribution...

---

Time to call it a day!

See you at the next merit spree!

Even if I caught the spree in real time, I am lagging as I am not an AI and I had something carbon-based to care about.
But I enjoyed the fact I was able to intercept the spree even before it stopped dumping merits on me!

Official @ddmrddmr thread



First, the usual the usual spreadsheet, where you see the two last sprees:



According to the total merits per pair of TICK-TOCK sprees, this is the new (lower) record since its inception.

As I said last month, @ddmrddmr has become more efficient at distributing merits in the traditional way, or he's saving merits for later! I honestly am rooting for the first option!

---

Merit Spree #53 by @ddmrddrmr

Official Description:


My review:


TICK: This is an almost perfect reply of merit spree #52. Smaller-sized double-meriting spree.
Textbook TICK Spree.
Smallest on record, the machinery is well perfectioned, with sheer efficiency.

Here's the TOP10:


Compared to Merit Spree #51, the numbers to enter the TOP10 are higher, which is quite usual. Only 4 merits to enter the chart, topped yet another time by @d5000, once more time topping the chart with the usual 24 merits, getting just shy of his record of 30 in merits spree #47. Shall I start taking note of who's topping this chart more often?

That's all folks for Merits Spree 53!

---

Merit Spree #54 by @ddmrddrmr

Official description:


My review:

TOCK This second spree was again the smallest of the bunch, right smaller than #52. For the first time, the spree TICK and the spree TOCK had roughly the same number of TXs. This spree was a "single one", as you can see from the spreadsheet and the chart of the most merited users,

Here's the TOP10:


Being a single merits spree, numbers are lower: 7 merits to top the chart and 2 to enter the TOP10.
Paid2 once again topped the chart; what is his secret for this consistency?
 
I will start getting merit statistics for a single merits spree! So 11 merits are the highest on record for a single merits spree! (merit spree 44!), and these 3 merits are the lowest required on the record, together with spree #44, #46 and #48: wen two?

Time to call it a day!


See you at the next merit spree!

That’s some fun image, lol… I suppose that’s you in the corner with a unicorn corn on your head, observing all the fun while on your device. I could really be that at times, just before I choose to get in on the party and go gaga but,

Will you tell them what’s going on, naaahhh, don’t crash the party!

Is that your device even or your cup of the Italian special Amaretto.

Oh, here he comes!



This time I saw the spree as it happened.
I am smiling on the crowd, again.

I am lagging even more than the last time.
I am on the lazy side of the event. There have been many times when I rushed to the forum station only to update this report.
Last time, I wasn't involved in the sprees; this time, I was barely scratched, yet I had to find a time slot to analyse this all.
I promise to be more reactive next time.
First things first!

Official @ddmrddmr thread



First, the usual the usual spreadsheet, where you see the two last sprees:



As you can see, the addition of the total merits per in the paired TICK-TOCK sprees has already underlined a new record: this is the smallest merit-circulating spree since launch.
As this last one is by far the smallest on record, either @ddmrddmr has become more efficient at distributing merits the traditional ways, or he's saving merits for later!

---

Merit Spree #51 by @ddmrddrmr

Official Description:


My review:


TICK: This is an almost perfect reply of merit spree #50. Small-sized double-meriting spree.
Textbook TICK Spree.

Here's the TOP10:


Compared to Merit Spree #47, the numbers to enter the TOP10 are higher, which is quite usual. Only 4 merits to enter the chart, topped yet another time by @d5000, with 24 merits, getting just shy of his record of 30 in merits spree #47. Shall I start taking note of who's topping this chart more often?

That's all folks for Merits Spree 51!

---

Merit Spree #52 by @ddmrddrmr

Official description:


My review:

TOCK This second spree was by far the smallest of the bunch: roughly half the size of merit spree 48 and similar, yet smaller than 50. It was a small-sized single merit spree. As I said, maybe it is difficult to find a post satisfying the criteria, or maybe @ddmrddmr is saving merit for later, so I tend to lean toward this one.

Here's the TOP10:


Being a single merits spree, numbers are lower: 3 merits to top the chart and 2 to enter the TOP10.
I will start getting merit statistics for a single merits spree! So 11 merits are the highest on record for a single merits spree! (merit spree 44!), and these 3 merits are the lowest required on the record, together with spree #44, #46 and #48: wen two?

Time to call it a day!

I will work hard to be admitted back into the @ddmrddmr merit spree and be more proactive next time!
I must admit that the 50 merit spree is quite an extensive effort by our Spanish entity.

See you at the next merit spree!

We are lied to in a lot of ways including very essential facts that do not add up with actual math and actual science.

Today on Saifedean Ammous's podcast, I was listening to a scientist (Dr. Willie Soon) talk about his frustrations with mainstream science that frequently is not backed up by actual numbers.

I just assume the final dentist is there to maintain balance and heep the companies on their toes to keep improving. Then when I overthink it, I think it's a gimmick; they expect the public to call their bluff if they say all dentists recommend it, so they say 9 out of 10, which has a ring to it.

You are right.  I am probably not remembering very well..

And here is a funny variation of the commercial from 2006.. and in that commercial they are saying 4 out of 5 dentists... so that 4 out of 5 might have had been the historical claim of the commercial... another funny thing is that it is a compromise position between the two of us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMatKgI9hCs

That would be just a small percentage of the forum, cause in my observation, legendary members gets a higher percentage of merits even though they make up the lowest number by ranks.

That's right. Some Legendaries may no longer maintain their quality because merit no longer matters to them. I have a different mindset, I care about the merit system and I want to contribute to many users (especially to my local board users) and help them rank up. That's why I try my best to maintain my quality and contribution even though lately I lack the sMerit to help them much.

Some users have a strange mindset in my opinion. They rarely send merit to Legendary because they think Legendary doesn't need merit. I often remind my local board users about this and I expect them to send merit to anyone regardless of rank and of course on quality posts.

I generally thought that after hitting legendary rank one would stop checking or getting excited when they receive a merit, but that's not the case at all, at least not for me. It also helps that it allows one merit others.

I thought it was 9 out of 10?