So is Genoil miner "depracted"?
Will that be updated?
Topic: Genoil's ZEC miner: AMD ZCash miner for Windows - 0.6 (Read 56746 times)
Will that be updated?
Dear users, a new listing: ZEC has been added to the exchange ABCC.com
So is Genoil miner "depracted"?
Will that be updated?
no he said that there was no competition anymore with clymore and left this behind, if you want an amd miner for zec just go with clymor
i was going to wait for a nvidia miner from genoil but he was not interested it seems...sadly
How to use in nicehash?
How can I test performance with a 390x and rx 480?
Genoil miner perform very weak now comparing to czm or sa or optminer How can I test performance with a 390x and rx 480?
How to use in nicehash?
How can I test performance with a 390x and rx 480?
How can I test performance with a 390x and rx 480?
So is Genoil miner "depracted"?
was looking back and couldn't find answer.
im trying to mine thru minning rig rentals
my bat file is:
genoil.exe -c us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 -u myaccount.1 -p x -P 1 -g 0 -i 20 -w 64 -f 2
im' getting following message.....
zconn exception in: read_until
I can mine fine on supernova and flypool
EDIT: found answer..mining rig rental doesn't support genoil zec miner yet
im trying to mine thru minning rig rentals
my bat file is:
genoil.exe -c us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 -u myaccount.1 -p x -P 1 -g 0 -i 20 -w 64 -f 2
im' getting following message.....
zconn exception in: read_until
I can mine fine on supernova and flypool
EDIT: found answer..mining rig rental doesn't support genoil zec miner yet
ignore this one - go for claymore
seriously genoil good job but now its claymore time!
seriously genoil good job but now its claymore time!
The Claymore 2.0 uses a lot of CPU power. It also uses a more power than the Claymore 1.1 version.
The latest Claymore 2.1 uses even more CPU power if you set the intensity level to 1 or 2. With 0, it is about 20%.
ignore this one - go for claymore
seriously genoil good job but now its claymore time!
seriously genoil good job but now its claymore time!
The Claymore 2.0 uses a lot of CPU power. It also uses a more power than the Claymore 1.1 version.
Gene and now, in some circumstances better than others, despite some of its weaknesses.
I look forward to a more stable 0.7
I look forward to a more stable 0.7
when time comes, genoil will become better and compete with claymore and others...charge some fees too when your miners are starting to kick ass.
ignore this one - go for claymore
seriously genoil good job but now its claymore time!
seriously genoil good job but now its claymore time!
Funny thing, I don't see much difference in revenue on eth vs zec, especially on Rx 470.
zec decreased in price a lot, while eth difficulty almost halved.
i guess, zec is better than eth on old GPUs like 280x and r7 370.
BTW, silentarmy v3 can be installed on Ubuntu 14.04 and 15.10 with a small adjustment.
zec decreased in price a lot, while eth difficulty almost halved.
i guess, zec is better than eth on old GPUs like 280x and r7 370.
BTW, silentarmy v3 can be installed on Ubuntu 14.04 and 15.10 with a small adjustment.
ZEC uses far less power than ETH from what I see so I will stay ZEC for a while, with ZEC i can run more rigs that i had to turn off before
On my various 1070s, ZEC seems to be using 15-20% less power than ETH.
I didn't notice what the figures were on the 950s and 960s.
I'll add my voice to those that appreciate your efforts and hope you continue to develop, at your own pace of course. People tend to forget that even though the open source competition might be somewhat slower than the paid miners, without that competition the fees would be outlandish. Think 2.5% is bad try 25-50% if it were the only game in town.
Anyway, here's o hoping you continue on.
Anyway, here's o hoping you continue on.
I just realized I had this miner confused with another! Just ignore the issue I mentioned a couple posts ago. Sorry about that!
Claymore is 10% slower than Genoil for me.
You need to tell us the GPU model. For most models, the Claymore miner is faster than that of Genoil.
Hey, would anyone here happen to know why the silent army version of this miner always crashes on my RX 480? The normal version works just fine, but a little slower. I'm using the default settings if that helps. I appreciate any help I can get. 
bugs does for every one till either a more stable update is released or SA v5 for windows, comes out then we may not need this updated but it would be cool to see but do understand if not,
ETH miners are already fully optimized, ZEC miners are at the early development stage.
I'd agree they are optimized for performance (you might squeeze another 1-2% out of them). But they are not optimized for power. I believe a 20-25% reduction in power consumption is possible.
Hey, would anyone here happen to know why the silent army version of this miner always crashes on my RX 480? The normal version works just fine, but a little slower. I'm using the default settings if that helps. I appreciate any help I can get.
Funny thing, I don't see much difference in revenue on eth vs zec, especially on Rx 470.
zec decreased in price a lot, while eth difficulty almost halved.
i guess, zec is better than eth on old GPUs like 280x and r7 370.
BTW, silentarmy v3 can be installed on Ubuntu 14.04 and 15.10 with a small adjustment.
zec decreased in price a lot, while eth difficulty almost halved.
i guess, zec is better than eth on old GPUs like 280x and r7 370.
BTW, silentarmy v3 can be installed on Ubuntu 14.04 and 15.10 with a small adjustment.
ZEC uses far less power than ETH from what I see so I will stay ZEC for a while, with ZEC i can run more rigs that i had to turn off before
Jump to: